RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Measuring (and Increasing) the Value of Academic Libraries

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104111146

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The value of the university library to faculty, students, and administrators has long been assumed. In an era of decreasing resources and increasing choices, academic librarians must now find the best ways to measure and demonstrate the value of the library to all of their stakeholders, including faculty members, graduate students, undergraduate students, administrators, and funders. Techniques to assess and measure value can also help library decision makers select the products and services that provide the highest return on investment (ROI) to the university community. It is important to measure and convey the value of the academic library; it is also possible to increase the value of the library to the university by carefully refocusing the academic library’s products and services. In this presentation I will discuss methods and results from a recently completed study in eight countries that measured the value and ROI of e-journals to the grants process. The Return on Investment (ROI) of the e-journals collection to grant funding ranged from over 15:1 to just under 1:1 in 9 institutions. In addition, many other qualitative and quantitative measures of value are as important as derived measures like ROI. Building on that research study, I am now leading a team that includes the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) and several university libraries in a project funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. We are collecting data using on the value of a wide range of library services using several methods for measuring the value of what the university library contributes to the institution and its stakeholders.
      번역하기

      The value of the university library to faculty, students, and administrators has long been assumed. In an era of decreasing resources and increasing choices, academic librarians must now find the best ways to measure and demonstrate the value of the l...

      The value of the university library to faculty, students, and administrators has long been assumed. In an era of decreasing resources and increasing choices, academic librarians must now find the best ways to measure and demonstrate the value of the library to all of their stakeholders, including faculty members, graduate students, undergraduate students, administrators, and funders. Techniques to assess and measure value can also help library decision makers select the products and services that provide the highest return on investment (ROI) to the university community. It is important to measure and convey the value of the academic library; it is also possible to increase the value of the library to the university by carefully refocusing the academic library’s products and services. In this presentation I will discuss methods and results from a recently completed study in eight countries that measured the value and ROI of e-journals to the grants process. The Return on Investment (ROI) of the e-journals collection to grant funding ranged from over 15:1 to just under 1:1 in 9 institutions. In addition, many other qualitative and quantitative measures of value are as important as derived measures like ROI. Building on that research study, I am now leading a team that includes the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) and several university libraries in a project funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. We are collecting data using on the value of a wide range of library services using several methods for measuring the value of what the university library contributes to the institution and its stakeholders.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Luther, J., "“University investment in the library: What’s the return? A case study at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign." Library Connect White Paper no. 1. Elsevier"

      2 King, D.W., Aerni, S., Brody, F., Herbison, M., & Knapp, A., "“The use and outcomes of university library print and electronic collections." The Sara Fine Institute for Interpersonal Behaviour and Technology"

      3 Tenopir, C., "“The Value Gap." Library Journal, 134"

      4 Kaufmann, P., "“The Library as Strategic Investment: The University of Illinois ‘Return on Investment Study’ from the Director’s Perspective." Presented at the LibraryConnect 2008 Seminar, Tokyo: Japan"

      5 King, D.W., Tenopir, C. & Clarke, M., "“Measuring total reading of journal articles." D-Lib, 12(10)"

      6 Research Information Network, "“Ejournals: their use, value, and impact." A Research Information Network Report in collaboration with Ciber, London, RIN, April 2009"

      7 King, D.W., Aerni, S., Brody, F., Herbison, M., & Knapp, A., "“Comparative costs of the University of Pittsburgh electronic and print library collections." The Sara Fine Institute for Interpersonal Behaviour and Technology"

      8 Tenopir, C., "What does usage data tell us about our users?" Incisive Media 80-86, 2007

      9 Tenopir, C., "Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: what makes a difference?" 31 (31): 139-148, 2009

      10 Tenopir, C., Love, A., Park, J., Wu, L., Baer, A., & Mays, R., "University investment in the library, phase II: An international study of the library’s value to the grants process" Elsevier

      1 Luther, J., "“University investment in the library: What’s the return? A case study at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign." Library Connect White Paper no. 1. Elsevier"

      2 King, D.W., Aerni, S., Brody, F., Herbison, M., & Knapp, A., "“The use and outcomes of university library print and electronic collections." The Sara Fine Institute for Interpersonal Behaviour and Technology"

      3 Tenopir, C., "“The Value Gap." Library Journal, 134"

      4 Kaufmann, P., "“The Library as Strategic Investment: The University of Illinois ‘Return on Investment Study’ from the Director’s Perspective." Presented at the LibraryConnect 2008 Seminar, Tokyo: Japan"

      5 King, D.W., Tenopir, C. & Clarke, M., "“Measuring total reading of journal articles." D-Lib, 12(10)"

      6 Research Information Network, "“Ejournals: their use, value, and impact." A Research Information Network Report in collaboration with Ciber, London, RIN, April 2009"

      7 King, D.W., Aerni, S., Brody, F., Herbison, M., & Knapp, A., "“Comparative costs of the University of Pittsburgh electronic and print library collections." The Sara Fine Institute for Interpersonal Behaviour and Technology"

      8 Tenopir, C., "What does usage data tell us about our users?" Incisive Media 80-86, 2007

      9 Tenopir, C., "Variations in article seeking and reading patterns of academics: what makes a difference?" 31 (31): 139-148, 2009

      10 Tenopir, C., Love, A., Park, J., Wu, L., Baer, A., & Mays, R., "University investment in the library, phase II: An international study of the library’s value to the grants process" Elsevier

      11 Luther, J., "University Investment in the Library: What’s the Return? A Case Study at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign"

      12 Tenopir, C., "Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers" Special Libraries Association 2000

      13 Mezick, E. M., "Return on investment: libraries and student retention" 33 (33): 561-566, 2007

      14 Ali, M. M., "Research grant and faculty productivity nexus: heterogeneity among dissimilar institutions" Academic Analytics

      15 Tenopir, C., "Perceptions of value and value beyond perceptions" 20 (20): 199-207, 2007

      16 Tenopir, C., "Measuring the value of the academic library: Return on Investment and other value measures" 58 (58): 39-48, 2009

      17 Tenopir, C., "Measuring the value and return on investment of academic libraries" 2009

      18 Matthews, J. R., "Library assessment in higher education" Libraries Unlimited 2007

      19 Jones, D. Y., "How much do the ‘best’ colleges spend on libraries?" 68 (68): 343-351, 2007

      20 Nicholas, D., "Finding information in (very large) digital libraries: a deep log approach to determining differences in use according to method of access" 32 (32): 119-126, 2006

      21 McClanahan, K., "Embracing change: perceptions of e-journals by university faculty members" 23 (23): 44-57, 2010

      22 Tenopir, C., "Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns" 61 (61): 5-32, 2009

      23 Strouse, R., "Demonstrating value and return on investment: The ongoing imperative - Assessing your library's value statement" 7 (7): 14-19, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2018-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.59 0.59 0.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.69 0.67 0.952 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼