This thesis research on Census register of Jayeudo(自如道) stations, which was discovered quite lately. Census register of Jayeudo stations was framed in 1804 and discovered after Kimcheondo(金泉道) and Songrado(松羅道) were found out. It was...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60134338
2009
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
87-124(38쪽)
10
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This thesis research on Census register of Jayeudo(自如道) stations, which was discovered quite lately. Census register of Jayeudo stations was framed in 1804 and discovered after Kimcheondo(金泉道) and Songrado(松羅道) were found out. It was...
This thesis research on Census register of Jayeudo(自如道) stations, which was discovered quite lately. Census register of Jayeudo stations was framed in 1804 and discovered after Kimcheondo(金泉道) and Songrado(松羅道) were found out. It was pretty useful to study a state and organization of single station district thanks to its absolutely good preservation without any defect. This thesis is quite meaningful to analyze station district and introduce it to the academic world for the first time.
Jayeudo stations, one of 11 station district in Kyeongsang(慶尙) province, had competence over a subordinate office of Kyeongsang province area nearby Kimhea(金海) and Changwon(昌原). And it was about 15 stations including Jayeudo station, the major one. The scale of station was various. For example, while about 2,000 station workers served in major station, there were only 300 workers or even 50 worked in substitute station. Here, I'll introduce some facts found out from studying Census register.
Structure and organization of early 19th century's all Jayeudo station workers could be revealed from the study. Classifying them into official clerks of station, servants and Ilsu(日守), here's some brief explanation for each. Official clerks of station, part of the station workers, were classified into regular clerks of station(元驛吏) and irregular clerks of station(流驛吏). There were 3,415 in total and regular clerks of station were 2,519 which is about 73.80% while irregular clerks of station were 896, 26.2%. The fact that there was discrimination between regular clerks of station and irregular clerks of station seems to prove that some needs to distinguish official clerks of station between themselves were raised, And researching surnames of official clerks, I could find out there were two or single major family names in each station, It seems this feature stems from their characteristics, aboriginal inhabitation and heredity of their jobs. A residential district of station clerks tended to be close to where their workplace, a station, was located. And their age, between grownups and young people, showed a ratio of 55 to 45. After adjusting for age, I could find out that they, purposely, reported their age younger than real trying to postpone a burden of obligations, which belongs to their offsprings.
The population of station servants between station workers was quite small. In Jayeudo stations, the major one, there were only 146 servants and usually there were none in substitute stations. The proportion of males to females in Jayeudo station was in the ratio of 6 to 4. According to research about social status of parents of station servants, a source of their supply were mostly in case their maternal line were female servants, Also, based on lots of cases, I could find out that most of the female servants married to commoners, which means marriages between two individuals from different social position were kinds of common affairs at that time.
The population of Ilsu was small, just same as station servants. Except 36 people who belongs to Jayedo station, the major one, there was almost no one in substitute stations. And unlike station servants, not any certain people from same family name were majority. It seems they were employed rather than being transmitted by heredity.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 竹腰禮子, "李朝初期の驛について" 日本 大阪大學 16 : 1982
2 有井智德, "李朝初期 驛站制硏究" 151 : 1994
3 김용섭, "한말에 있어 중답주와 역둔토의 지주제" 20 : 1978
4 조병로, "한국역제사" 한국마사회 마사박물관 2002
5 허선도, "한국군제사 -근세조선전기편-" 육군본부 1968
6 조병로, "한국 근세 역제사연구" 국학자료원 2005
7 조병로, "조선후기의 역지분석 -관서역지를 중심으로-" 18 : 1984
8 김위현, "조선후기 영동역참에 대한 일고" 6 : 1983
9 최호, "조선후기 역촌에 대한 일고찰 -단성현 호적대장을 중심으로-" 4 : 1985
10 김위현, "조선후기 대창역에 대한 제문제" 7 : 1979
1 竹腰禮子, "李朝初期の驛について" 日本 大阪大學 16 : 1982
2 有井智德, "李朝初期 驛站制硏究" 151 : 1994
3 김용섭, "한말에 있어 중답주와 역둔토의 지주제" 20 : 1978
4 조병로, "한국역제사" 한국마사회 마사박물관 2002
5 허선도, "한국군제사 -근세조선전기편-" 육군본부 1968
6 조병로, "한국 근세 역제사연구" 국학자료원 2005
7 조병로, "조선후기의 역지분석 -관서역지를 중심으로-" 18 : 1984
8 김위현, "조선후기 영동역참에 대한 일고" 6 : 1983
9 최호, "조선후기 역촌에 대한 일고찰 -단성현 호적대장을 중심으로-" 4 : 1985
10 김위현, "조선후기 대창역에 대한 제문제" 7 : 1979
11 조병로, "조선후기 교통발달에 관한 연구" 57 : 1992
12 조병로, "조선후기 『김천도형지안』을 통해 본 역민의 구성과 직역변화" 22 : 2003
13 이장우, "조선초기의 역전" 142 : 1994
14 유선호, "조선초기의 역로와 직로" 70 : 1999
15 박홍갑, "조선전기의 찰방" 40 : 1989
16 이경식, "조선전기의 역전의 경영변동" 1986
17 조병로, "조선전기 역리에 대한 연구" 동국대학교 1980
18 조병로, "조선시대 역참제도발달에 관한 연구" 2 : 1985
19 김옥근, "조선시대 역전론고" 4 : 1980
20 이지우, "조선시대 경남지역의 역참조직과 운영실태" 20 : 2006
21 양만우, "역승고" 2 : 1967
22 홍경희, "대동여지도에 나타난 역참의 분포와 입지" 경북대 23 : 1981
23 호적대장연구팀, "단성 호적대장연구" 성균관대 대동문화연구원 2003
24 전형택, "노비신분층의 동향과 변화" 국사편찬위원회 34 : 1995
25 김창수, "교통과 운수" 국사편찬위원회 10 : 1981
26 김준형, "陳弊錄" 진주문화원 2007
27 "續大典"
28 "經國大典"
29 "槐軒古宅 기증유물도록 ; 天理의 거울을 닦은 괴헌가 사람들" 소수박물관 2007
30 "朝鮮王朝實錄"
31 井上和枝, "朝鮮時代の驛吏について -驛吏の身分變化と存在樣態を中心に-" 日本 鹿兒島國際大學附屬 地域總合硏究所 30 (30): 2002
32 井上和枝, "朝鮮後期の驛村と驛民 -慶尙道晉州牧召村里戶籍大帳を中心に-" 日本 學習院大學 東洋文化硏究所 51 : 2002
33 竹腰禮子, "朝鮮後期 驛民の身分變動について -金泉道·松羅道形止案の分析を中心に" 日本 大阪大學 25 : 1991
34 "掾曹龜鑑" 서강대학교 인문과학연구소 1982
35 조병로, "慶尙道 金泉驛戶" 국학자료원 2002
36 "大典通編"
37 "大典會通"
38 "增補文獻備考"
39 "備邊司謄錄"
40 "『嶺南驛誌』(규장각 소장본)"
41 "『嘉慶九年自如道甲子式形止案』(일본 교토대학 부속도서관 소장본)"
42 이노우에가즈에, "19세기 戶籍大帳에서 보는 역촌 사람들의 存在樣態 ― 晉州 召村里를 중심으로" 대동문화연구원 42 : 209-261, 2003
43 한기범, "17세기 역속인의 신분적 지위" 13 : 1984
이용우, 『프랑스의 과거사 청산: 숙청과 기억의 역사, 1944~2004』(역사비평사, 2008)
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2020 | 평가예정 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | |
1999-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 0.91 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.84 | 0.75 | 1.505 | 0.51 |