RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      2012 여수세계박람회 콘텐츠 분석을 통한 국내 메가 이벤트의 연출 방법 연구 = A Study of Directorial Ways to Domestic Mega Events Through the Analysis of Contents of Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99708605

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      We should decide how to approach to effective directorial ways in order to establish successful contents strategy of mega events which will be held in the future in the age of limitless cultural competition. We have thought highly of the outer scale and quantities of the ones rather than essentially directorial viewpoints so far considering previous Asian Games Seoul 1986, Seoul Olympic 1988, Dae-Jeon Expo 1993, Korea Japan World Cup, and Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea.
      Through analyzing the contents of Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea which was invested astronomically, I would like to study the trend of the contents of current domestic mega events and suggest the way to direct the ones such as Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea effectively in terms of directorial viewpoints in the future. Through this kind of analysis, I would like to contribute the process that directs coming mega events such as Suncheon Bay Garden Expo 2013, Asian Games Incheon 2014, Pyung Chang Winter Olympic 2018 and that could be based on the mainstream of worldwide creative contents.
      I divided the contents of Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea up video·exhibition one, performance one, and complex content according to those technical style. I hope to suggest the style of the contents that are suitable to future mega events examining the characteristics of the above-mentioned three kinds of contents and responses of spectators. I will examine the Big O, Expo Digital Gallery, and Exhibition Hall 2 in Korea pavilion as video·exhibition content, Sea Show, Invited Shows & Street Shows, Children Theater as performance content, and Theme Pavilion, Exhibition hall 1 in Korea pavilion, Samsung Pavilion, and Climate & Environment Pavilion as complex content.
      번역하기

      We should decide how to approach to effective directorial ways in order to establish successful contents strategy of mega events which will be held in the future in the age of limitless cultural competition. We have thought highly of the outer scale a...

      We should decide how to approach to effective directorial ways in order to establish successful contents strategy of mega events which will be held in the future in the age of limitless cultural competition. We have thought highly of the outer scale and quantities of the ones rather than essentially directorial viewpoints so far considering previous Asian Games Seoul 1986, Seoul Olympic 1988, Dae-Jeon Expo 1993, Korea Japan World Cup, and Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea.
      Through analyzing the contents of Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea which was invested astronomically, I would like to study the trend of the contents of current domestic mega events and suggest the way to direct the ones such as Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea effectively in terms of directorial viewpoints in the future. Through this kind of analysis, I would like to contribute the process that directs coming mega events such as Suncheon Bay Garden Expo 2013, Asian Games Incheon 2014, Pyung Chang Winter Olympic 2018 and that could be based on the mainstream of worldwide creative contents.
      I divided the contents of Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea up video·exhibition one, performance one, and complex content according to those technical style. I hope to suggest the style of the contents that are suitable to future mega events examining the characteristics of the above-mentioned three kinds of contents and responses of spectators. I will examine the Big O, Expo Digital Gallery, and Exhibition Hall 2 in Korea pavilion as video·exhibition content, Sea Show, Invited Shows & Street Shows, Children Theater as performance content, and Theme Pavilion, Exhibition hall 1 in Korea pavilion, Samsung Pavilion, and Climate & Environment Pavilion as complex content.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      We should decide how to approach to effective directorial ways in order to establish successful contents strategy of mega events which will be held in the future in the age of limitless cultural competition. We have thought highly of the outer scale and quantities of the ones rather than essentially directorial viewpoints so far considering previous Asian Games Seoul 1986, Seoul Olympic 1988, Dae-Jeon Expo 1993, Korea Japan World Cup, and Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea.
      Through analyzing the contents of Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea which was invested astronomically, I would like to study the trend of the contents of current domestic mega events and suggest the way to direct the ones such as Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea effectively in terms of directorial viewpoints in the future. Through this kind of analysis, I would like to contribute the process that directs coming mega events such as Suncheon Bay Garden Expo 2013, Asian Games Incheon 2014, Pyung Chang Winter Olympic 2018 and that could be based on the mainstream of worldwide creative contents.
      I divided the contents of Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea up video·exhibition one, performance one, and complex content according to those technical style. I hope to suggest the style of the contents that are suitable to future mega events examining the characteristics of the above-mentioned three kinds of contents and responses of spectators. I will examine the Big O, Expo Digital Gallery, and Exhibition Hall 2 in Korea pavilion as video·exhibition content, Sea Show, Invited Shows & Street Shows, Children Theater as performance content, and Theme Pavilion, Exhibition hall 1 in Korea pavilion, Samsung Pavilion, and Climate & Environment Pavilion as complex content.
      번역하기

      We should decide how to approach to effective directorial ways in order to establish successful contents strategy of mega events which will be held in the future in the age of limitless cultural competition. We have thought highly of the outer scale a...

      We should decide how to approach to effective directorial ways in order to establish successful contents strategy of mega events which will be held in the future in the age of limitless cultural competition. We have thought highly of the outer scale and quantities of the ones rather than essentially directorial viewpoints so far considering previous Asian Games Seoul 1986, Seoul Olympic 1988, Dae-Jeon Expo 1993, Korea Japan World Cup, and Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea.
      Through analyzing the contents of Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea which was invested astronomically, I would like to study the trend of the contents of current domestic mega events and suggest the way to direct the ones such as Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea effectively in terms of directorial viewpoints in the future. Through this kind of analysis, I would like to contribute the process that directs coming mega events such as Suncheon Bay Garden Expo 2013, Asian Games Incheon 2014, Pyung Chang Winter Olympic 2018 and that could be based on the mainstream of worldwide creative contents.
      I divided the contents of Expo 2012 Yeosu Korea up video·exhibition one, performance one, and complex content according to those technical style. I hope to suggest the style of the contents that are suitable to future mega events examining the characteristics of the above-mentioned three kinds of contents and responses of spectators. I will examine the Big O, Expo Digital Gallery, and Exhibition Hall 2 in Korea pavilion as video·exhibition content, Sea Show, Invited Shows & Street Shows, Children Theater as performance content, and Theme Pavilion, Exhibition hall 1 in Korea pavilion, Samsung Pavilion, and Climate & Environment Pavilion as complex content.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 영상 · 전시 콘텐츠
      • Ⅲ. 공연 콘텐츠
      • Ⅳ. 복합 콘텐츠
      • Abstract
      • Ⅰ. 머리말
      • Ⅱ. 영상 · 전시 콘텐츠
      • Ⅲ. 공연 콘텐츠
      • Ⅳ. 복합 콘텐츠
      • Ⅴ. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼