Can MRI Findings Help to Predict Neurological Recovery in Paraplegics With Thoracolumbar Fracture?

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective To evaluate the usefulness of various magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in the prognosis of neurological recovery in paraplegics with thoracolumbar fracture using association analysis with clinical outcomes and electrodiagnostic features.
Methods This retrospective study involved 30 patients treated for paraplegia following thoracolumbar fracture.
On axial and sagittal T2-weighted MRI scans, nerve root sedimentation sign, root aggregation sign, and signal intensity changes in the conus medullaris were independently assessed by two raters. A positive sedimentation sign was defined as the absence of nerve root sedimentation. The root aggregation sign was defined as the presence of root aggregation in at least one axial MRI scan. Clinical outcomes including the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale, ambulatory capacity, and electrodiagnostic features were used for association analysis.
Results Inter-rater reliability of the nerve root sedimentation sign and the root aggregation sign were k=0.67 (p=0.001) and k=0.78 (p<0.001), respectively. A positive sedimentation sign was significantly associated with recovery of ambulatory capacity after a rehabilitation program (c2=4.854, p=0.028). The presence of the root aggregation sign was associated with reduced compound muscle action potential amplitude of common peroneal and tibial nerves in nerve conduction studies (c2=5.026, p=0.025).
Conclusion A positive sedimentation sign was significantly associated with recovery of ambulatory capacity and not indicative of persistent paralysis. The root aggregation sign suggested the existence of significant cauda equina injuries.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Court-Brown CM, "Tornetta P. Trauma" Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 226-227, 2006

2 Kirkpatrick AW, "Thoracolumbar spine fractures: is there a problem?" 45 : 21-24, 2002

3 Prabhakar MM, "Thoracolumbar burst fracture with complete paraplegia: rationale for second-stage anterior decompression and fusion regarding functional outcome" 10 : 83-90, 2009

4 Macedo LG, "The sedimentation sign for differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis" 38 : 827-831, 2013

5 Hussey RW, "Spinal cord injury: requirements for ambulation" 54 : 544-547, 1973

6 Crozier KS, "Spinal cord injury: prognosis for ambulation based on quadriceps recovery" 30 : 762-767, 1992

7 Mikles MR, "Posterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures" 12 : 424-435, 2004

8 Laitt R, "Patterns of chronic adhesive arachnoiditis following Myodil myelography:the significance of spinal canal stenosis and previous surgery" 69 : 693-698, 1996

9 Barz T, "Nerve root sedimentation sign: evaluation of a new radiological sign in lumbar spinal stenosis" 35 : 892-897, 2010

10 Tomkins-Lane CC, "Nerve root sedimentation sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: reliability, sensitivity, and specificity" 38 : E1554-E1560, 2013

11 Curt A, "Nerve conduction study in cervical spinal cord injury: significance for hand function" 7 : 165-173, 1996

12 Al-Mefty O, "Myelopathic cervical spondylotic lesions demonstrated by magnetic resonance imaging" 68 : 217-222, 1988

13 Chiodo A, "Magnetic resonance imaging vs. electrodiagnostic root compromise in lumbar spinal stenosis:a masked controlled study" 87 : 789-797, 2008

14 Okada Y, "Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy" 18 : 2024-2029, 1993

15 Mehalic TF, "Magnetic resonance imaging and cervical spondylotic myelopathy" 26 : 217-227, 1990

16 Barz T, "Increased intraoperative epidural pressure in lumbar spinal stenosis patients with a positive nerve root sedimentation sign" 23 : 985-990, 2014

17 Takahashi M, "Increased MR signal intensity secondary to chronic cervical cord compression" 29 : 550-556, 1987

18 Matsuda Y, "Increased MR signal intensity due to cervical myelopathy: analysis of 29 surgical cases" 74 : 887-892, 1991

19 Kingwell SP, "Factors affecting neurological outcome in traumatic conus medullaris and cauda equina injuries" 25 : E7-, 2008

20 Holmes JF, "Epidemiology of thoracolumbar spine injury in blunt trauma" 8 : 866-872, 2001

21 Jackson A, "Does degenerative disease of the lumbar spine cause arachnoiditis? A magnetic resonance study and review of the literature" 67 : 840-847, 1994

22 Barz T, "Clinical validity of the nerve root sedimentation sign in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis" 14 : 667-674, 2014

23 Staub LP, "Clinical validation study to measure the performance of the Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis" 32 : 470-474, 2011

24 Gardner A, "Cauda equina syndrome:a review of the current clinical and medicolegal position" 20 : 690-697, 2011

25 Kostuik JP, "Cauda equina syndrome and lumbar disc herniation" 68 : 386-391, 1986

26 Wada E, "Can intramedullary signal change on magnetic resonance imaging predict surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy?" 24 : 455-462, 1999

27 Malas MA, "An investigation of the conus medullaris termination level during the period of fetal development to adulthood" 76 : 453-459, 2001

28 Curt A, "Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury:significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocol in predicting outcome" 78 : 39-43, 1997