해방 후 국어학계의 분열과 대립― 언어민족주의와 ‘과학적’ 언어학을 중심으로 ― = Language Nationalism and Scientific Linguistic after the Liberation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article is to explain how the divisions between language nationalists andscientific linguists during Japan colonial period were carried over the languagepolicy and leadership competition in the academia of Korean language after theliberation. After the liberation, the two had been shown to coexist for a shortterm even though they had a different set of values for language. However, itdid not last long. They had distinctly different stances for the language, ethnicgroups or relationship between language and society. Therefore Both sides startedto struggled for the leadership in the education and study for the korean afterthat. An acute their conflict started, to make matters worse, it is not over yetand hold out in any sense still.
The language nationalists, who were carrying on the hangul movement thatbegan by Ju, Si kyung, recognized that the here and hereafter of the countryprosperity depends on keeping and elaborating Hangul. So they would be tryingto actively involve in real national linguistic life.
They tried to set the language standard and loanword orthography. For thosereasons, they got into the government agencies and took charge of language policy.
They made some turning point of which korean got out of antecedent chineselanguage area by achieving the exclusive usage of Hangul and horizontal writingof it.
Contrastively, the scientific linguists, who majored in Chosŏn Language andLiterature under Japanese scholars at Kyŏngsŏng Imperial University, did notagree with language nationalists. They denied a normative law of languages, whichis a different view point from language nationalists’. They strenuously insistedthat the linguistic should not intervene into real language life at all. Whenever they criticized the language nationalism, they claimed to stand for science.
To put it simply, the core of variances was on how the relationship betweenlinguistic and practical language set. They split into two factions by choosingwhether they had to involve in setting language standard through ‘the Hangulmovement’ or leave it as it is because language simply should be an object ofstudy. By the way, the science which scientific linguistics used was merely a showyword for the sense of superiority from Kyŏngsŏng Imperial University graduate.
They used it to non Kyongsong Imperial University graduate in order to showthat they held prominent positions. Those kinds of fancy words are being reproducedconstantly by the graduates from Korean language and literature Korean languageeducation at Seoul National University, which is connected to Chosŏn Languageand Literature at Kyŏngg Imperial University.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한글학회, "한글학회 50년사" 한글학회 1971

2 정재환, "한글의 시대를 열다-해방 후 한글학회 활동 연구" 경인문화사 2013

3 김민수, "주시경 연구" 탑출판사 1986

4 박용규, "조선어학회 항일 투쟁사" 한글학회 2012

5 이준식, "일제 침략기 한글 운동 연구" 49 : 1996

6 이준식, "일제 강점기의 대학 제도와 학문 체계 - 경성제대의 '조선어문학과'를 중심으로" 한국사회사학회 (61) : 6-218, 2002

7 일석이희승전집간행위원회, "일석 이희승 전집 2" 서울대학교출판부 2000

8 고영근, "일석 선생과 국문학 연구" (46·47) : 1985

9 김영환, "이희승의 친일 국어학에 대한 비판" 16 : 1996

10 이준식, "외솔과 조선어학회의 한글 운동" 18 (18): 1994

11 조성윤, "외솔과 언어 민족주의 : 한문의 세계에서 한글의 세계로" 18 (18): 1994

12 이준식, "언어의 분단을 막은 두 한글학자―김두봉과 최현배" 역사문제연구소 82 (82): 41-67, 2008

13 이병근, "심악 이숭녕 선생의 삶과 학문" 32 (32): 1982

14 신주백, "식민지기 새로운 지식체계로서 ‘조선사’‧‘조선문학’‧‘동양철학’의 형성과 고등교육" 국학연구원 (160) : 255-298, 2012

15 이응호, "미군정기의 한글운동사" 성청사 1974

16 김석득, "근현대의 국어(학) 정신사―국어연구학회에서 조선어학회 수난까지, 그 역사적 의미―" 한글학회 (272) : 61-95, 2006

17 고영근, "국어학 체계의 형성·발전, In 국어학연구백년사 1" 일조각 1992

18 정준영, "경성제국대학과 식민지 헤게모니" 서울대학교 대학원 2009

19 장신, "경성제국대학 사학과의 자장(磁場)" 역사문제연구소 15 (15): 45-83, 2011

20 김영환, "‘과학적’ 국어학 비판－이희승을 중심으로" 252 : 2001

21 신주백, "1930년대 초중반 朝鮮學 學術場의 재구성과 관련한 시론적 탐색―경성제대 졸업자의 조선연구 태도 및 연구방법과 관련하여" 역사문제연구소 15 (15): 85-109, 2011