RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    문화번역의 번역(불)가능성 = (Un)translatability of Cultural Translation: A Study of Postcolonial Translation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100751321

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study pays attention to the cultural aspect of translation, which has been used as the channel of colonization or that of post-colonization. Chapter II explores the ideology discovered in the process of cultural translation. In particular, the chapter examines how cultural translation might implant distorted images of other cultures, through the issues raised by Edward W. Said and Chinua Achebe. The emphasis of this study is to point out the colonial obsession that one should translate other cultures from the perspective of one’s own culture. This chapter considers J. M. Coetzee’s Foe as a novel that excellently deals with this issue.
    Chapter III investigates ‘untranslatability.’ When translators come across the untranslatability of other cultures in the translation process, the result of translation completely differs according to the attitude with which the translators face the untranslatability and their perception of it. In contrast to colonialists’ sense of superiority about ‘the translatable,’ the concept of untranslatability of ‘the untranslatable’ is paradoxically important in that it is a thoughtful and positive gesture approaching translatability.
    번역하기

    This study pays attention to the cultural aspect of translation, which has been used as the channel of colonization or that of post-colonization. Chapter II explores the ideology discovered in the process of cultural translation. In particular, the ch...

    This study pays attention to the cultural aspect of translation, which has been used as the channel of colonization or that of post-colonization. Chapter II explores the ideology discovered in the process of cultural translation. In particular, the chapter examines how cultural translation might implant distorted images of other cultures, through the issues raised by Edward W. Said and Chinua Achebe. The emphasis of this study is to point out the colonial obsession that one should translate other cultures from the perspective of one’s own culture. This chapter considers J. M. Coetzee’s Foe as a novel that excellently deals with this issue.
    Chapter III investigates ‘untranslatability.’ When translators come across the untranslatability of other cultures in the translation process, the result of translation completely differs according to the attitude with which the translators face the untranslatability and their perception of it. In contrast to colonialists’ sense of superiority about ‘the translatable,’ the concept of untranslatability of ‘the untranslatable’ is paradoxically important in that it is a thoughtful and positive gesture approaching translatability.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론
    • II. 문화번역의 제국주의적 강박
    • III. 번역(불)가능성
    • IV. 결론
    • Works Cited
    • I. 서론
    • II. 문화번역의 제국주의적 강박
    • III. 번역(불)가능성
    • IV. 결론
    • Works Cited
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼