RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SSCI

      Leadership and Commitment: The United States and the Future of the Northeast Asian Order

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104873336

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since the end of World War II, peace, prosperity, and democracy have flourished in Northeast Asia in large part due to the United States willingness to devote extraordinary resources and exert leadership through a series of bilateral commitments to th...

      Since the end of World War II, peace, prosperity, and democracy have flourished in Northeast Asia in large part due to the United States willingness to devote extraordinary resources and exert leadership through a series of bilateral commitments to the nations of the region. In the past two decades, crises in other parts of the world have captured U.S. attention and resources: in Eastern Europe after the fall of the Soviet Union and now in the Middle East. What are the consequences of these demands on how the United States envisions its future role in Northeast Asia? We assess these consequences by evaluating the strategies that the United States has elaborated for the region and how those strategies resonate with people in the United States and in the region. Our analysis focuses on two questions: How does the United States envision its role in Northeast Asia? Does the United States have the political will to bear the costs to fulfill this role? We argue that despite increased demands on its attention and resources, the United States remains firmly committed to its leadership role in the region and the U.S. centric security architecture of bilateral institutions. Multilateral institutions will remain relatively ineffective and inefficient in addressing the most pressing regional issues.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Hemmer, Christopher, "Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism" 56 (56): 575-608, 2002

      2 Pew Research Center, "What the World Thinks in 2002"

      3 US Pacific Command, "United States Pacific Command: ‘Partnership, Readiness, Presence’"

      4 American Political Science Association, "US Standing in the World: Causes, Consequences, and the Future, Long Report of the Task Force on U.S. Standing in World Affairs"

      5 Guardian, "US Embassy Cables: China ‘Would Accept’ Korean Reunification"

      6 US Department of Defense, "US Casualty Status"

      7 Dawson, Chester, "U.S.-Japan Relations Warm"

      8 Wines, Michael, "U.S. and China Revive Military Talks"

      9 Barnes, Julian E., "U.S. Prods Tepid Tokyo on Seoul Ties"

      10 Barnes, Julian E., "U.S. Admiral Cautions Seoul on Acting Alone"

      1 Hemmer, Christopher, "Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism" 56 (56): 575-608, 2002

      2 Pew Research Center, "What the World Thinks in 2002"

      3 US Pacific Command, "United States Pacific Command: ‘Partnership, Readiness, Presence’"

      4 American Political Science Association, "US Standing in the World: Causes, Consequences, and the Future, Long Report of the Task Force on U.S. Standing in World Affairs"

      5 Guardian, "US Embassy Cables: China ‘Would Accept’ Korean Reunification"

      6 US Department of Defense, "US Casualty Status"

      7 Dawson, Chester, "U.S.-Japan Relations Warm"

      8 Wines, Michael, "U.S. and China Revive Military Talks"

      9 Barnes, Julian E., "U.S. Prods Tepid Tokyo on Seoul Ties"

      10 Barnes, Julian E., "U.S. Admiral Cautions Seoul on Acting Alone"

      11 Johnston, Alastair Iain, "Treating International Institutions As Social Environments" 45 (45): 487-515, 2001

      12 Krauthammer, Charles, "The Unipolar Moment" 70 (70): 23-33, 1990

      13 Armitage, Richard L., "The U.S.–Japan Alliance: Getting Asia Right through 2020" Center for Strategic and International Studies 2007

      14 Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" W.W. Norton 2001

      15 Mead,Walter Russell, "The Tea Party and American Foreign Policy" 90 (90): 28-44, 2011

      16 David C. Kang, "The Security of Northeast Asia" 국제관계연구소 24 (24): 1-21, 2009

      17 Fukuyama, Francis, "The Security Architecture in Asia and American Foreign Policy, In East Asian Multilateralism: Prospects for Regional Stability" Johns Hopkins University Press 234-253, 2008

      18 Zakaria, Fareed, "The Post-American World" W. W. Norton 2009

      19 US Forces Korea, "The New Korea"

      20 Mahbubani, Kishore, "The New Asian Hemisphere: The Irresistible Shift of Global Power to the East" PublicAffairs 2008

      21 Bush, George W., "The National Security Strategy of the United States of America" US White House 2002

      22 Ricks, Thomas, "The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, 2006-2008" Penguin Press 2009

      23 Friedberg, Aaron L., "The Future of U.S.–China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?" 30 (30): 7-45, 2005

      24 Dahl, Robert A, "The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to A Successful Protest" 55 (55): 763-772, 1961

      25 Krastev, Ivan, "The Anti-American Century?" 15 (15): 5-16, 2004

      26 Luce, Henry R., "The American Century" 23 (23): 159-171, 1999

      27 Chu Shulong, "THE SIX-PARTY TALKS: A CHINESE PERSPECTIVE" 극동문제연구소 32 (32): 29-43, 2008

      28 Gates, Robert M., "Speech Delivered with CJCS Admiral Mike Mullen for the Rollout of the Fiscal Year 2011 Defense Budget Request"

      29 Sharp, Walter L., "Speech"

      30 T. J. Pempel, "Soft Balancing, Hedging, and Institutional Darwinism: The Economic-Security Nexus and East Asian Regionalism" 동아시아연구원 10 (10): 209-238, 2010

      31 Hirschman, Albert O., "Shifting Involvements : Private Interest and Public Action" Princeton University Press 1982

      32 Joo, Seung-Ho, "Russia’s Role in Six-Party Negotiations" 19 (19): 107-140, 2004

      33 US White House, "Remarks by President Obama and President Lee Myung-Bak of the Republic of Korea"

      34 Economist, "Reality Bites: Governing Is Harder Than Campaigning. But America’s 44th President Has Made An Adequate Start"

      35 US Department of Defense, "Quadrennial Defense Review"

      36 US Department of Defense, "Quadrennial Defense Review"

      37 Holsti, Ole R., "Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy" University of Michigan Press 2004

      38 Campbell, Kurt M., "Principles of U.S. Engagement in the Asia-Pacific"

      39 Paulson, Henry M., Jr, "On the Brink: Inside the Race to Stop the Collapse of the Global Financial System" Business Plus 2010

      40 Pew Research Center, "Obama More Popular Abroad Than At Home, Global Image of U.S. Continues to Benefit"

      41 Searight, Amy, "New Challenges, New Vision, Pedestrian Progress"

      42 Reagan, Ronald, "National Security Strategy of the United States" International Defense Publishers 1988

      43 Wang, Zheng, "National Humiliation, History Education, and the Politics of Historical Memory: Patriotic Education Campaign in China" 52 (52): 783-806, 2008

      44 Seung-Ho Joo, "Moscow-Pyongyang Relations under Kim Jong-il: High Hopes and Sober Reality" 국제관계연구소 24 (24): 107-130, 2009

      45 Pempel, T.J., "More Pax, Less Americana in Asia" 10 (10): 465-490, 2010

      46 Kaplan, Robert D., "Monsoon : The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power" Random House 2010

      47 US Department of Defense, "Military Power of the People’s Republic of China" Office of the Secretary of Defense 2009

      48 Blumenstein, Rebecca, "Japan Caves In on China; Looks to U.S.,”"

      49 김명섭, "Is the 21st Century an “Asian Century”? Raising More Reservations than Hopes" 국제관계연구소 25 (25): 161-180, 2010

      50 Albright, Madeleine, "Interview with Matt Lauer"

      51 Park, John S., "Inside Multilateralism: The Six-Party Talks" 28 (28): 75-91, 2005

      52 Obama, Barack H., "Inaugural Address"

      53 Mearsheimer, John J., "Imperial by Design" 11 : 34-, 2011

      54 Fallows, James, "How America Can Rise Again"

      55 Gries, Peter Hays, "Historical Beliefs and the Perception of Threat in Northeast Asia: Colonialism, the Tributary System, and China-Japan-Korea Relations in the Twenty-First Century" 9 (9): 245-265, 2009

      56 US Department of Defense, "DoD Personnel & Procurement Statistics"

      57 Kissinger, Henry, "Diplomacy" Simon & Schuster 1994

      58 Peter Van Ness, "Designing a Mechanism for Multilateral Security Cooperation in Northeast Asia" 극동문제연구소 32 (32): 107-126, 2008

      59 Japan Ministry of Defense, "Defense of Japan 2009"

      60 Bush, George W., "Decision Points" Crown Publishers 2010

      61 Atkinson, Carol, "Constructivist Implications of Material Power: Military Engagement and the Socialization of States 1972–2000" 50 (50): 509-537, 2006

      62 Sharp, Walter L., "Commander’s Keynote Address"

      63 Medeiros, Evan S., "China’s New Diplomacy" 82 (82): 22-35, 2003

      64 People’s Republic of China, "China’s National Defense in 2008"

      65 "Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Global Views 2010 – Constrained Internationalism: Adapting to New Realities Results of A 2010 National Survey of American Public Opinion"

      66 Economist, "By Fits and Starts"

      67 Gibbs, Robert, "Briefing by White House Press Secretary"

      68 Chung, Jae Ho, "Between Ally and Partner : Korea-China Relations and the United States" Columbia University Press 2007

      69 US Department of Defense, "Background on the Secretary of Defense Trip to China, Japan, and the Republic of Korea"

      70 Overholt, William H., "Asia, America, and the Transformation of Geopolitics" Cambridge University Press 2008

      71 Cha, Victor D., "Anti-Americanism and the U.S. Role in Inter-Korean Relations, In Korean Attitudes Toward the United States: Changing Dynamics" M.E. Sharpe 116-138, 2005

      72 Chiozza, Giacomo, "Anti-Americanism and the American World Order" Johns Hopkins University Press 2009

      73 US Department of Defense, "Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of the People’s Republic of China 2006"

      74 Pew Research Center, "America’s Place in the World, 2009: An Investigation of Public and Leadership Opinion About International Affairs"

      75 Waltz, Kenneth N., "America as a Model for theWorld?AForeign Policy Perspective" 24 (24): 667-670, 1991

      76 Ikenberry, G. John, "After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraints, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars" Princeton University Press 2001

      77 Keohane, Robert O., "After Hegemony : Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy" Princeton University Press 1984

      78 Clinton, William J., "A National Security Strategy for A New Century" US White House 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 SSCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.55 0.37 0.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.42 0.39 0.602 0.21
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼