독일 내재적 접근의 한국적 수용과 오해 -북한연구에 대한 함의- = Korean Acceptance and Misconception of Immanent Approach in Germany: Implication on North Korea Studies

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article aims to critically review misperception on immanent approach that Song Doo-Yul had introduced as a new approach of North Korea Studies in 1988, in terms of semantic analysis and methodology. Thus, the primary purpose of the work is not only to rectify equivocal vocabulary that Song had heedlessly interpreted, but also to think better of immanent approach in North Korea Studies. Firstly, Song may fall in etymologic inaccuracy that had not made a distinction between ``transzendental`` and ``transznedent`` in the German language: Song had contrasted ``immanent`` with ``transzendental``, but semantically ``tranzendent`` rather than ``transzendental``. So to speak, theantonym of ``immanent`` is not external, but ``transcendent`` in English. Secondly, Immanent approach that presented in South Korea has made a false representation of its meanings and subject matters in terms of approach. In this regard, Song``s works could not help being insufficient owing to lack of references and adequate understanding to immanent approach. Finally, many researches wrapped around immanent approach can be quasi-totalitarian approach as a transmitted form in terms of the classification of approach. Because it is exhausting in internal disputesthat researchers shall tell ``immanent`` from ``transcendent``, the works that reclassifies approaches are an unproductive endeavor. Different theorists, however, need to reflect what they are doing. As a authority cited, North Korea Studies in South Korea must reconsider meta-theoretical approach: Ontological-Normative, Empiricalanalytical, Dialectical-Critical. In brief, this request may be confuted as eurocentric or German-centric, but it is convinced that meta-theoretical deliberation should be the only alternatives to surmount underdeveloped tendency of the theory in North Korea Studies.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 송두율, "현대와 사상: 사회주의ㆍ(탈)현대ㆍ민족" 한길사 1990

2 안석교, "현대사회과학의 방법론" 한길사 1984

3 김세균, "정치학의 대상과 방법" 박영사 2005

4 한국정치학회, "정치학 이해의 길잡이: 정치이론과 방법론" 법문사 2008

5 하버마스, "인식과 관심" 고려원 1983

6 송두율, "소련과 중국: 사회주의 사회에서의 노동자ㆍ농민ㆍ지식인" 한길사 1990

7 조성박, "세계를 매혹시키는 김정일 정치" 평양 1999

8 박성규, "사회주의이행논쟁: 수위지 베텔하임의 논쟁" 들녘 1989

9 노먼 블래키, "사회이론과 방법론에 다가서기" 한울아카데미 2000

10 곽승지, "북한체제 연구의 쟁점" 한울아카데미 2007

11 박형중, "북한적 현상의 연구-북한 사회주의 건설의 정치경제학" 연구사 1994

12 박형중, "북한의 개혁 개방과 체제변화: 비교사회주의를 통해 본 북한의 현재와 미래" 해남 2004

13 최완규, "북한은 어디로: 전환기 북한적 정치현상의 재인식" 경남대출판부 1996

14 구갑우, "북한연구와 비교사회주의 방법론" 한울아카데미 2003

15 송두율, "북한연구에서의 ‘내재적 방법’ 재론" (28) : 1995

16 강정인, "북한연구 방법에 대한 새로운 제언" (26) : 1994

17 김영수, "북한연구 동향 평가: 성과와 과제" 50 : 2006

18 송두율, "북한사회를 어떻게 볼 것인가: 북한사회를 제대로 인식하기 위해서는 정당한 방법론이 마련되어야 한다" 1988

19 김성보, "북한 현대사 연구의 성과와 쟁점: 탈냉전， 역사학의 관점에서" (13) : 2005

20 한석원, "마르크스주의와 국가자본주의 논쟁" 풀무질 1995

21 박형중, "독일의 동독연구에서 ‘전체주의론’과 ‘내재적접근론" (10) : 1999

22 김덕영, "논쟁의 역사를 통해 본 사회학" 한울아카데미 2003

23 Drath, Martin, "Totalitarismus in der Volksdemokratie, Seidel/Jenkner(Hg.) Wege der Totalitarismus-Forschung, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchges"

24 Lenk, "Theorie der Politik" Campus 1987

25 Ludz, "The Role of the Social Sciences, in Eastern Europe in the 1970's" The Free Press 1972

26 Ludz, "The Changing Party Elite in East Germany" MIT Press 1972

27 Meyer, Gerd, "Sozialistische Systeme; Theorie-und Strukturanalyse" Ein Studienbuch, Opladen: UTB 1979

28 Glae?er, Gert-Joachim, "Sozialistische Systeme: Einf?rung in die Kommunismus und DDR-Forschung" VS Verlag 1982

29 Hennicke, Peter, "Probleme des Sozialismus und der ?ergangsgesellschaften" Suhrkamp 1973

30 Lenk, Kurt, "Politische Wissenschaft. Ein Grundri" Kohlhammer 1975

31 Lane, David, "Politics and Society in the USSR" Martin Robertson 1978

32 Ludz, "Partei im Wandel" Westdeutscher Verlag 1968

33 Engels,Friedrich, "Marx und die “Neue Rheinische Zeitung” 1848-49, Marx/Engels-Werke Band 21" Dietz Verlag 1962

34 Nohlen, Dieter, "Lexikon der Politik. Bd.2, M?chen"

35 Gransow, Volker, "Konzeptionelle Wandlungen der Kommunismusforschung; Vom Totalitarismus zur Immanenz" Campus 1980

36 Meyer, "Die westdeutsche DDR- und Deutschlandforschung im Umbruch" 25 (25): 1992

37 Beyme, von Klaus, "Die politischen Theorien der Gegenwart. Eine Einf?rung, M?chen: Piper"

38 Beyme,von Klaus, "Die politischen Theorien der Gegenwart" VS Verlag 2000

39 Klaus Schroeder, "Die DDR-Forschung vor und nach 1989/90,” Enquete-Kommission Uberwindung der Folgen der SED-Diktatur im Prozeß der deutschen Einheit, Bd. IV/2" Suhrkamp 1999

40 Ludz, Peter Christian, "Die DDR zwischen Ost und West" C.H. Beck Verlag 1977

41 Adorno,T.W., "Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Sozioloie" Luchterhand 1969

42 "Buchstein, Hubertus, “Ideologie und Empirie. Der Versuch einer Rekonstruktion des intellektuellen Profils von Peter C. Ludz,” In: Ralf Rytlewski (Hg.), Politik und Gesellschaft in sozialistischen Landern-Ergebnisse und Probleme der Sozialistische Lander-Forschung, Sonderheft 20 der PVS"

43 "Alemann, Ulrich von/Forndran, Erhard, Methodik der Politikwissenschaft: Eine Einf?rung in Arbeitstechnik und Forschungspraxis, Berlin"

44 Beyme, von Klaus, "?onomie und Politik im Sozialismus, M?chen: R. Piper Verlag"

45 Schulze,P.W., "?ergangsgesellschaft: Herrschaftsform und Praxis am Beispiel der Sowjetunion" Fischer-TB. Verlag 1974