지배구조 및 소유구조가 경영진보상에 미치는 영향

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 요약
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 선행 연구
• Ⅲ. 표본 및 연구 방법
• Ⅳ. 실증분석 결과
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 〈참고문헌〉
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 국찬표, "한국기업집단의 투자결정과 자본비용" 13 : 101-129, 1997

2 김태수, "한국기업에서 경영자보상과 경영성과 간의 관계" 24 : 87-115, 1999

3 강윤식, "최대주주의 이사회 참여여부가 경영진보상에 미치는 영향" 2009

4 김준철, "이사회구조 및 기업집단의 그룹본부가 경영자보상에 미치는 영향" 한국전략경영학회 8 (8): 21-38, 2005

5 박애영, "은행의 소유지배구조가 경영자보상구조에 미치는 영향" 대한경영학회 22 (22): 149-180, 2009

6 임형록, "우리나라 주요 대기업의 임원 임금보상과 임금격차의 적정성에 관한 실증연구" 대한경영학회 20 (20): 1193-1211, 2007

7 박경서, "대주주의 존재가 한국기업의 지배구조에 미치는 영향" 한국재무학회 17 (17): 163-201, 2004

8 강준구, "기업집단과 대리인문제: 재벌 및 비재벌 인수기업의 합병성과 비교연구" 14 : 49-88, 2001

9 강준구, "기업집단(재벌)의 효율성과 주주 부의 극대화 : 신주발행을 중심으로" 한국재무학회 15 (15): 1-47, 2002

10 김병호, "기업의 소유구조와 기업가치 및 수익률에 대한 연구: 임원지분율을 중심으로" 한국증권학회 30 : 391-434, 2002

11 강준구, "국내기업 자본조달정책의 효율성에 관한 실증연구 : 기업집단의 사모주식발행과 기업가치" 한국재무학회 16 (16): 69-113, 2003

12 최문희, "경영자의 보수 규제에 관한 외국의 동향" 40 : 26-33, 2008

13 황인태, "경영자보상과 기업성과" 20 : 107-125, 1995

14 박재영, "경영성과 측정치와 경영자보상간의 관련성에 관한 실증연구" 대한경영학회 20 (20): 2729-2752, 2007

15 Jensen M. C., "Value maximisation, stake- holder theory and the corporate objective function" 7 : 297-317, 2001

16 Main B. G. M., "Total board remuneration and company perfor- mance" 106 : 627-644, 1996

17 Conyon M. J., "Top pay, company performance and corporate governance" 56 : 229-247, 1994

18 Jensen M. C., "Theory of the firm:Managerial behavior,agency costs and ownership structure" 3 : 303-360, 1976

19 Faccio, M., "The ultimate ownership of Western European corpora- tions" 65 : 365-395, 2002

20 Claessens, S., "The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations" 58 : 81-112, 2000

21 Firth M., "The remuneration of CEOs and corporate financial performance in Norway" 17 : 291-301, 1996

22 Conyon M. J., "The prince and the pauper? CEO pay in the United States and United Kingdom" 110 : 640-671, 2000

23 Stulz, R., "The limits of financial globa- lization" 60 : 1595-1638, 2005

24 Smith, C., "The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies" 32 : 263-292, 1992

25 Huddart, S., "The effect of a large share-holder on corporate value" 39 : 1407-1421, 1993

26 Kubo, K., "The determinants of executive compensation in Japan and the UK: Agency hypothesis or joint determination hypothesis?. in: Designing Financial Sys- tems in East Asia and Japan" Routledge 2001

27 Fama E. F., "Separation of ownership and control" 26 : 301-325, 1983

28 Banker, R. D., "Sensitivity, precision, and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation" 27 : 21-39, 1989

29 Allen, M., "Power and privilege in the large corporation: Corporate control and mana- gerial compensation" 86 : 1112-1123, 1981

30 Jensen M. C., "Perfor- mance pay and top-management incen- tives" 98 : 225-264, 1990

31 Ezzamel M., "Pay compa- rability across and within UK boards: An empirical analysis of the pay cash awards to CEOs and other board members" 39 : 207-232, 2002

32 Bebchuk, L. A., "Pay Without Performance" Harvard University Press 2004

33 Lorsch J. W., "Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Cor- porate Boards" Harvard Business School Press 1989

34 Grossman, S. J., "One-share- one vote and the market for corporate control" 20 : 175-202, 1988

35 Morck R., "Management ownership and market valu- ation" 20 : 293-315, 1988

36 Morgan, A. G., "Linking pay to performance-compensation propo- sals in the S&P 500" 62 : 489-523, 2001

37 Shleifer, A., "Large share- holders and corporate control" 10 : 461-488, 1986

38 Hartzell J. C., "Institutional investors and executive compensation" 58 : 2351-2374, 2003

39 Crystal, G., "In Search of Excess: The Overcompensation of American Execu- tives" Norton and Company 1991

40 Kostiuk, P., "Firm size & executive com- pensation" 25 : 90-105, 1990

41 Burkart, M., "Family firms" 58 : 2167-2201, 2003

42 Core, J. E., "Executive equity compensation and incen- tive: a survey" 9 : 27-51, 2003

43 Murphy, K. J., "Executive compensation. in: Handbook of Labor Economics" Elsevier Science 1999

44 Kato, T., "Executive compensation, firm performance and chae- bols in Korea: Evidence from new panel data" 2005

45 Bebchuk, L. A., "Executive compensation as an agency problem" 17 : 71-92, 2003

46 Kato, T., "Executive compen- sation, firm performance, and state owner- ship in China: Evidence from new panel data, William Davidson Institute Working Paper" 2004

47 Cyert, R., "Corporate governance, takeovers, and top-manage- ment compensation: Theory and evidence" 48 : 453-469, 2002

48 Morck, R., "Corporate governance, economic entren- chment, and growth" 43 : 657-722, 2005

49 Core, J. E., "Corporate governance, chief exe- cutive officer compensation and firm per- formance" 51 : 371-406, 1999

50 Cyert, R., "Corporate governance and the level of CEO compen- sation" Carnegie Mellon University 1997

51 Harris, M., "Corporate gover- nance: Voting rights and majority rules" 20 : 203-236, 1988

52 김성민, "Corporate Governance and Dividend Policy under External Financing Constraints and Agency Problems" 한국증권학회 37 (37): 949-981, 2008

53 Chhaochharia, V., "CEO compensation and board structure" 62 : 231-261, 2009

54 Conyon M. J., "Board control, remuneration committees, and top mana- gement compensation" 41 : 146-157, 1998

55 Rosen, S., "Authority, control, and the distribution of earnings" 13 : 311-323, 1982

56 Black, B., "Agents watching agents: The promise of institutional investor voice" 39 : 811-893, 1992

57 Talmor, E., "A unified analysis of executive pay: The case of the financial sector" Univer- sity of California 2000