RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    배아단계의 인간생명에 대한 형법적 보호 = The Protection of Human Embryo by Criminal Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99696262

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    An experiment to clone a human embryo has already taken place under the present conditions. We are in the middle of a fierce debate over backing biomedical research that uses cells from human embryos. Finding consensus among the social groups will be challenging for now. Scientists believe research using stem cells from embryos will be needed in the foreseeable future to determine their value in therapy for human disease and our understanding of stem cell development. Although unprecedented ethical issues and potential dangers to humanity lurk behind embryo cloning, it also has the potential to provide treatments and cures for major diseases such as juvenile diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Yet some people criticize cloning technology. There are many who object to use of human embryonic stem cells for research on moral or religious grounds. Such ethical concerns relate to two issues, one the instrumentalization of human embryos, i.e. the reproduction of life to a commodity, and two, deep concern about the risk of a slide from the cloning of human beings(reproductive cloning). Some people view embryo research as intrinsically immoral as they believe that from the moment of conception the human embryo has the full status of a human person. Such a viewpoint can not countenance any experimental procedure which entails the destruction of embryos, as the derivation of stem cells must. Another opposing concern is the integrity of individuals and their right not to be treated as a commodity. They said, all forms of cloning violate natural laws, and sooner or later it is destined to destroy all of humanity while spawning social chaos. The fundamental properties of our existence as well as nature will be distorted. What's more, the definition of relationships and social institutions, such as maniage and family, will have to be redefined. This article is concerns the protection of embryo in criminal law. It concerns an area of biological research believed to have great promise for the treatment of many serious, chronic medical diseases for which current therapies are inadequate. However these studies evoke important moral and ethical issues, as well as strong emotions. Therefore, scientific research in this field should be undertaken by simultaneously addressing the ethical issues. The policy recommendations set out in this paper address both these scientific and ethical concerns. Though the implementation of regulations on cloning technology is urgently needed in South Korea, regulations are only in the process of being reviewed by the National Assembly. The National Assembly discussed revising the Biotechnology Promotion Act to add regulations concerning bioethics and biosafety, but the legislation program did not pass. As necessary as cloning regulations are in Korea, the National Assembly to take its time in legislating the new law. This article supports this recommendation and urges government legislators to enact legislation to ensure that such research is properly regulated and controlled. And, this recommendation endorses the view that reproductive cloning should not be permitted but that studies involving therapeutic cloning should be allowed, although under tightly controlled regulations. As with the derivation of stem cells from surplus embryos. the moral debate centres round the question of adequate legislative controls, to draw limits on what is permitted in scientific research in this field. Without clear and enforceable legislation, there would be nothing to stop the slide to reproductive cloning. Thus, I wish to see that appropriate measures are put in place as soon as possible.
    번역하기

    An experiment to clone a human embryo has already taken place under the present conditions. We are in the middle of a fierce debate over backing biomedical research that uses cells from human embryos. Finding consensus among the social groups will be ...

    An experiment to clone a human embryo has already taken place under the present conditions. We are in the middle of a fierce debate over backing biomedical research that uses cells from human embryos. Finding consensus among the social groups will be challenging for now. Scientists believe research using stem cells from embryos will be needed in the foreseeable future to determine their value in therapy for human disease and our understanding of stem cell development. Although unprecedented ethical issues and potential dangers to humanity lurk behind embryo cloning, it also has the potential to provide treatments and cures for major diseases such as juvenile diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Yet some people criticize cloning technology. There are many who object to use of human embryonic stem cells for research on moral or religious grounds. Such ethical concerns relate to two issues, one the instrumentalization of human embryos, i.e. the reproduction of life to a commodity, and two, deep concern about the risk of a slide from the cloning of human beings(reproductive cloning). Some people view embryo research as intrinsically immoral as they believe that from the moment of conception the human embryo has the full status of a human person. Such a viewpoint can not countenance any experimental procedure which entails the destruction of embryos, as the derivation of stem cells must. Another opposing concern is the integrity of individuals and their right not to be treated as a commodity. They said, all forms of cloning violate natural laws, and sooner or later it is destined to destroy all of humanity while spawning social chaos. The fundamental properties of our existence as well as nature will be distorted. What's more, the definition of relationships and social institutions, such as maniage and family, will have to be redefined. This article is concerns the protection of embryo in criminal law. It concerns an area of biological research believed to have great promise for the treatment of many serious, chronic medical diseases for which current therapies are inadequate. However these studies evoke important moral and ethical issues, as well as strong emotions. Therefore, scientific research in this field should be undertaken by simultaneously addressing the ethical issues. The policy recommendations set out in this paper address both these scientific and ethical concerns. Though the implementation of regulations on cloning technology is urgently needed in South Korea, regulations are only in the process of being reviewed by the National Assembly. The National Assembly discussed revising the Biotechnology Promotion Act to add regulations concerning bioethics and biosafety, but the legislation program did not pass. As necessary as cloning regulations are in Korea, the National Assembly to take its time in legislating the new law. This article supports this recommendation and urges government legislators to enact legislation to ensure that such research is properly regulated and controlled. And, this recommendation endorses the view that reproductive cloning should not be permitted but that studies involving therapeutic cloning should be allowed, although under tightly controlled regulations. As with the derivation of stem cells from surplus embryos. the moral debate centres round the question of adequate legislative controls, to draw limits on what is permitted in scientific research in this field. Without clear and enforceable legislation, there would be nothing to stop the slide to reproductive cloning. Thus, I wish to see that appropriate measures are put in place as soon as possible.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 들어가며
    • Ⅱ. 인간복제를 둘러싼 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 인간 배아에 대한 형법적 보호
    • Ⅳ. 나가며
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. 들어가며
    • Ⅱ. 인간복제를 둘러싼 이론적 배경
    • Ⅲ. 인간 배아에 대한 형법적 보호
    • Ⅳ. 나가며
    • Abstract
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.37 1.37 1.47
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.45 1.38 1.729 0.7
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼