Utility of a forced expiratory flow of 25 to 75 percentas a predictor in children with asthma

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose:Asthma is defined as chronic inflammation of the lower small airways, and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is a pathophysiologic feature of asthma. It has been proposed that although there is no direct variable capable of assessing the small airways, a forced expiratory flow of between 25 and 75 percent (FEF25-75) might be considered a more sensitive early marker of small airway obstruction than the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Thus, we proposed that the presence and degree of positive responses to bronchial methacholine testing were related to the difference (DFF) and ratio (RFF) between FEV1 and FEF25-75 in asthmatic children.
Methods:The subjects were 583 symptomatic children, including 324 children with BHR and 259 controls. Pulmonary function tests, methacholine challenge tests, and skin prick tests were performed, and the total eosinophil count, total serum IgE, and serum eosinophil cationic protein level were measured in all subjects. From a concentration-response curve, the methacholine concentration required to produce a decrease of 20% from post-saline FEV1 was calculated (PC20).
Results:The median DFF and RFF values decreased in controls compared to subjects with bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and this trend was found in groups ranked by its severity. PC20 had a negative correlation with DFF and RFF. Cutoff values of 0.5 for DFF and 1.042 for RFF were identified, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
Conclusion:This study revealed that DFF and RFF might be predictive of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the context of normal FEV1 in children. (Korean J Pediatr 2008;51:323-328)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose:Asthma is defined as chronic inflammation of the lower small airways, and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is a pathophysiologic feature of asthma. It has been proposed that although there is no direct variable capable of assessing the small airways, a forced expiratory flow of between 25 and 75 percent (FEF25-75) might be considered a more sensitive early marker of small airway obstruction than the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Thus, we proposed that the presence and degree of positive responses to bronchial methacholine testing were related to the difference (DFF) and ratio (RFF) between FEV1 and FEF25-75 in asthmatic children.
Methods:The subjects were 583 symptomatic children, including 324 children with BHR and 259 controls. Pulmonary function tests, methacholine challenge tests, and skin prick tests were performed, and the total eosinophil count, total serum IgE, and serum eosinophil cationic protein level were measured in all subjects. From a concentration-response curve, the methacholine concentration required to produce a decrease of 20% from post-saline FEV1 was calculated (PC20).
Results:The median DFF and RFF values decreased in controls compared to subjects with bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and this trend was found in groups ranked by its severity. PC20 had a negative correlation with DFF and RFF. Cutoff values of 0.5 for DFF and 1.042 for RFF were identified, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated.
Conclusion:This study revealed that DFF and RFF might be predictive of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the context of normal FEV1 in children. (Korean J Pediatr 2008;51:323-328)

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Alberts WM, "The FEF25-75% and the clinical diagnosis of asthma" 73 : 221-225, 1994

2 Chai H, "Standarization of bronchial inhalation challenge procedure" 56 : 323-327, 1975

3 Enright PL, "Spirometry in the lung health study. 1. Methods and quality control" 143 : 1215-1223, 1991

4 Cirillo I, "Role of FEF25%-75% as a predictor of bronchial hyperreactivity in allergic patients" 96 : 692-700, 2006

5 Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention, "Revised 2006. National Institutes of Health Publication No 95-3659 1995"

6 Enright PL, "Physiologic measures: pulmonary function tests. Asthma outcome" 149 : S9-S18, 1994

7 Ferguson AC, "Persisting airway obstruction in asymptomatic children with asthma with normal peak expiratory flow rates" 82 : 19-22, 1988

8 Yoon KA, "Normal predicted values of pulmonary function test in Korean school-aged children" 36 : 25-37, 1993

9 "National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma.: Bethesda, MD: NIH publication 96-3659B"

10 Leuallen EC, "Maximal midexpiratory flow" 72 : 783-800, 1955

11 "Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies" 144 : 1202-1218, 1991

12 Hamid Q, "Inflammation of small airways in asthma" 100 : 44-51, 1997

13 Crapo RO, "Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999" 161 : 309-329, 2000

14 Fuhlbrigge AL, "Forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage improves the classification of severity among children with asthma" 118 : 347-355, 2006

15 Fonseca-Guedes CH, "Exercise-induced bronchospasm in children: comparison of FEV1 and FEF25-75% responses" 36 : 49-54, 2003

16 Kang H, "Comparison of Obesity between children with asthma and healthy children" 13 : 17-25, 2003

17 Bacharier LB, "Classifying asthma severity in children: mismatch between symptoms, medication use, and lung function" 170 : 426-432, 2004

18 Kraft M, "Alveolar tissue inflammation in asthma" 154 : 1505-1510, 1996

19 McFadden ER, Jr., "A reduction in maximum mid-expiratory flow rate. A spirographic manifestation of small airway disease" 52 : 725-737, 1972