RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Contrastive Topics in Chinese Comparatives

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107271840

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper is to argue that the two compared things in Chinese comparatives, i.e. target in the main clause and standard in the comparative clause should be analyzed as serving as a contrastive topic. Building on Li & Thompson’s (1981) study of Chinese comparatives, we show that Chinese encodes a contrastive topic structurally in the overt syntax of comparatives. More specifically, it is structurally configured in pre-subject position interleaved between an aboutness topic and a focus. Based on the structural make-up for a contrastive topic in Chinese, we investigate the subject vs. non-subject asymmetry when the fragmentary target/standard of comparison acts as a contrastive topic. At the same time, we use WCO effects and a ban on multiple foci to confirm that the fragmentary target/standard is not a focus but a contrastive topic.
      번역하기

      This paper is to argue that the two compared things in Chinese comparatives, i.e. target in the main clause and standard in the comparative clause should be analyzed as serving as a contrastive topic. Building on Li & Thompson’s (1981) study of Chin...

      This paper is to argue that the two compared things in Chinese comparatives, i.e. target in the main clause and standard in the comparative clause should be analyzed as serving as a contrastive topic. Building on Li & Thompson’s (1981) study of Chinese comparatives, we show that Chinese encodes a contrastive topic structurally in the overt syntax of comparatives. More specifically, it is structurally configured in pre-subject position interleaved between an aboutness topic and a focus. Based on the structural make-up for a contrastive topic in Chinese, we investigate the subject vs. non-subject asymmetry when the fragmentary target/standard of comparison acts as a contrastive topic. At the same time, we use WCO effects and a ban on multiple foci to confirm that the fragmentary target/standard is not a focus but a contrastive topic.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박소영, "한·중 비교구문의 매개변이 관점" 언어정보연구소 36 : 109-141, 2019

      2 Paul, Waltraud, "What the topic is(not)about. The case of Mandarin Chinese"

      3 Lasnik, Howard, "Weakest crossover" 22 (22): 687-720, 1991

      4 Shyu, Shu-ing, "The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese" University of Southern California 1995

      5 Benincà, Paola., "The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol.2" Oxford University Press 2004

      6 Benincà, Paola, "The left periphery of medieval romance" 2 (2): 243-297, 2004

      7 Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther, "The Chinese ‘bi’ comparative" 121 (121): 1767-1795, 2011

      8 Xu, Liejiong, "The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. V" Blackwell Publishing 2006

      9 Li, Charles N., "Subject and Topic" Academic Press 1976

      10 Constant, Noah, "On the independence of Mandarin aspectual and contrastive sentence-final ne" 2011

      1 박소영, "한·중 비교구문의 매개변이 관점" 언어정보연구소 36 : 109-141, 2019

      2 Paul, Waltraud, "What the topic is(not)about. The case of Mandarin Chinese"

      3 Lasnik, Howard, "Weakest crossover" 22 (22): 687-720, 1991

      4 Shyu, Shu-ing, "The syntax of focus and topic in Mandarin Chinese" University of Southern California 1995

      5 Benincà, Paola., "The structure of CP and IP. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol.2" Oxford University Press 2004

      6 Benincà, Paola, "The left periphery of medieval romance" 2 (2): 243-297, 2004

      7 Liu, Chen-Sheng Luther, "The Chinese ‘bi’ comparative" 121 (121): 1767-1795, 2011

      8 Xu, Liejiong, "The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. V" Blackwell Publishing 2006

      9 Li, Charles N., "Subject and Topic" Academic Press 1976

      10 Constant, Noah, "On the independence of Mandarin aspectual and contrastive sentence-final ne" 2011

      11 Badan, Linda, "Mapping the left periphery" Oxford University Press 2011

      12 Li, Charles N., "Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar" University of California Press 1981

      13 Constant, Noah, "Contrastive topic: Meanings and realizations" University of Massachusetts 2014

      14 Han, Chung-hye, "Asymmetry in the interpretation of(n)un in Korean" 7 : 1998

      15 Lee, Chungmn, "Asymmetry in Grammar: Syntax and Semantics" John Benjamins 2003

      16 Chao, Yuen-ren, "A grammar of spoken Chinese" University of California Press 1968

      17 김종복, "A Phrasal Analysis of Korean Comparatives" 한국생성문법학회 20 (20): 179-205, 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.38 0.38 0.3
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.23 0.863 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼