RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    과학영재학교 교수활동에 관한 학생인식 및 과학수업에서 상호작용 유형 = Students' Perception of Teaching Activities and Verbla Interaction in Science Classes at the Gifted Science High School

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104661889

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to analyze gifted students' perception of the teaching activities at the gifted science high school (Busan Science Academy), in Busan, Korea, and to investigate the science experiment class practice. In this study, a questionnaire about the curriculum courses, teaching strategies, and evaluation method of the school was administered to 139 gifted students. The verbal interactions during the science experiment class were audio and videotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. The results of this study are as follows: First, according to the gifted students’perception, the credits of specialized courses and advanced elective courses need to be increased and the credits of general courses need to be reduced. Second, teachers at this school mainly use teaching strategies such as lecture, group activities, and discussion; on the other hand, the students prefer diverse teaching strategies such as discussion, lecture, experiment, inquiring activities, and problem solving. Third, students prefer a writing test assessment rather than a written report assessment or portfolio assessment. Fourth, the patterns of verbal interaction were different depending on the level of the teachers’ questions and interactions between the students in the experiment class facilitated students’ inquiry.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to analyze gifted students' perception of the teaching activities at the gifted science high school (Busan Science Academy), in Busan, Korea, and to investigate the science experiment class practice. In this study, a quest...

    The purpose of this study is to analyze gifted students' perception of the teaching activities at the gifted science high school (Busan Science Academy), in Busan, Korea, and to investigate the science experiment class practice. In this study, a questionnaire about the curriculum courses, teaching strategies, and evaluation method of the school was administered to 139 gifted students. The verbal interactions during the science experiment class were audio and videotaped, transcribed, and analyzed. The results of this study are as follows: First, according to the gifted students’perception, the credits of specialized courses and advanced elective courses need to be increased and the credits of general courses need to be reduced. Second, teachers at this school mainly use teaching strategies such as lecture, group activities, and discussion; on the other hand, the students prefer diverse teaching strategies such as discussion, lecture, experiment, inquiring activities, and problem solving. Third, students prefer a writing test assessment rather than a written report assessment or portfolio assessment. Fourth, the patterns of verbal interaction were different depending on the level of the teachers’ questions and interactions between the students in the experiment class facilitated students’ inquiry.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "What matters in curriculum forgifted learners Reflection on theory" Allyn & Bacon. 126-135, 1997

    2 "The educationaldefinition of giftedness and its policy implications. In R. J. Sternberg Conceptions of giftedness" Cambridge University Press. 12-33, 1986

    3 "The cognitive-affective interactionmodel for enriching gifted programs. In J. S. Renzulli Systems and models for developing programs forthe gifted and talented" Creative Learning Press. 461-484, 1986

    4 "Methods andmaterials for teaching the gifted. Waco" PrufrockPress. 8-, 2001

    5 "Knowledgegrowth in teaching. Educational Researcher" 4-14, 1986

    6 "Introduction andoverview. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis" Allyn & Bacon. 3-23, 1997

    7 "Curriculum development for the gifted.London" 75-77, 1982

    8 "Creativity in the classroom: Schools of" Longman. 45-, 1995

    1 "What matters in curriculum forgifted learners Reflection on theory" Allyn & Bacon. 126-135, 1997

    2 "The educationaldefinition of giftedness and its policy implications. In R. J. Sternberg Conceptions of giftedness" Cambridge University Press. 12-33, 1986

    3 "The cognitive-affective interactionmodel for enriching gifted programs. In J. S. Renzulli Systems and models for developing programs forthe gifted and talented" Creative Learning Press. 461-484, 1986

    4 "Methods andmaterials for teaching the gifted. Waco" PrufrockPress. 8-, 2001

    5 "Knowledgegrowth in teaching. Educational Researcher" 4-14, 1986

    6 "Introduction andoverview. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis" Allyn & Bacon. 3-23, 1997

    7 "Curriculum development for the gifted.London" 75-77, 1982

    8 "Creativity in the classroom: Schools of" Longman. 45-, 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-02-19 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Earth Science Society KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.47 0.47 0.49
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.51 0.52 0.909 0.21
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼