RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    교수역량 증진을 위한 변화필요도분석 = Needs Analysis for Improving Teaching Competency

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959435

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this research is to develop a self diagnostic tool of faculties teaching competency, through competency modeling processes, and to analyze and prioritize the needs of teaching competency of change, based upon the assessment results. To attain the purpose described above, research questions are as follows; 1.What are the elements that explains validated teaching competency model? 2. What is the validation result of the self assessment instrument of faculties teaching competency through competency modeling process? 3. What are the analyzed competencies and prioritized teaching competencies to change based upon the assessment results? To find out the answers to the above research questions, competency modeling has been done to define teaching competencies through conducting Delphi survey technique. Based on the developed provisional teaching competency model, the self assessment instrument for teaching competencies has been developed. Data collected from self assessment has been used for analyzing the priority of teaching competency change for faculties. To find out the answers to the above research questions, competency modeling has been done to define teaching competencies through conducting Delphi survey technique. Based on the developed provisional teaching competency model, the self assessment instrument for teaching competencies has been developed. Data collected from self assessment has been used to verify the validity and reliability and also refined data that has been used for analyzing the priority of teaching competency change for faculties. The main findings according to the research questions are as follows; First, this teaching competency model is divided by 2 sections including 51 behavioral indexes; which are 8 lecture related competencies and 7 fundamental attainment, including organizational core values required by their organization. Second, after conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis for construct validity and construct reliability, it provided a reasonable result to satisfy the criteria. Third, according to the needs analysis by Borich`s formula though the result of 227 self diagnosis, the prioritized teaching competency for change perceived by the faculty were global mind set(2.85) and self development(2.17). On the other hand, regarding to college group characteristic variable, there was a significant difference among three colleges. In terms of needs for change in each individual level, there is a big differences among all individual respondents.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this research is to develop a self diagnostic tool of faculties teaching competency, through competency modeling processes, and to analyze and prioritize the needs of teaching competency of change, based upon the assessment results. To ...

    The purpose of this research is to develop a self diagnostic tool of faculties teaching competency, through competency modeling processes, and to analyze and prioritize the needs of teaching competency of change, based upon the assessment results. To attain the purpose described above, research questions are as follows; 1.What are the elements that explains validated teaching competency model? 2. What is the validation result of the self assessment instrument of faculties teaching competency through competency modeling process? 3. What are the analyzed competencies and prioritized teaching competencies to change based upon the assessment results? To find out the answers to the above research questions, competency modeling has been done to define teaching competencies through conducting Delphi survey technique. Based on the developed provisional teaching competency model, the self assessment instrument for teaching competencies has been developed. Data collected from self assessment has been used for analyzing the priority of teaching competency change for faculties. To find out the answers to the above research questions, competency modeling has been done to define teaching competencies through conducting Delphi survey technique. Based on the developed provisional teaching competency model, the self assessment instrument for teaching competencies has been developed. Data collected from self assessment has been used to verify the validity and reliability and also refined data that has been used for analyzing the priority of teaching competency change for faculties. The main findings according to the research questions are as follows; First, this teaching competency model is divided by 2 sections including 51 behavioral indexes; which are 8 lecture related competencies and 7 fundamental attainment, including organizational core values required by their organization. Second, after conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis for construct validity and construct reliability, it provided a reasonable result to satisfy the criteria. Third, according to the needs analysis by Borich`s formula though the result of 227 self diagnosis, the prioritized teaching competency for change perceived by the faculty were global mind set(2.85) and self development(2.17). On the other hand, regarding to college group characteristic variable, there was a significant difference among three colleges. In terms of needs for change in each individual level, there is a big differences among all individual respondents.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Spencer, L. M., "핵심역량 모델의 개발과 활용" PSI 컨설팅 1998

    2 김용익, "초등학교 교원들의 기술적 교양에 대한 교육요구 분석" 한국실과교육학회 14 (14): 6-6, 2001

    3 진성희, "초등 교수역량요소 도출 및 예비초등교사와 초등교사간 교수역량 인식 비교" 한국초등교육학회 22 (22): 343-368, 2009

    4 강석주, "중등학교 담임교사 역량 탐구: 일반계 고등학교 담임교사 역량을 중심으로" 한국교육학회 42 (42): 237-264, 2004

    5 백순근, "중등학교 교사의 교수역량 구성요인에 대한 이론적 고찰" 교육연구소 8 (8): 47-69, 2007

    6 노혜란, "인적자원개발을 위한 교수 역량(teaching competency) 모델 개발" 한국직업능력개발원 7 (7): 1-28, 2004

    7 최정임, "인적자원 개발을 위한 요구분석 실천가이드" 학지사 2002

    8 강상진, "우리 대학의 현황과 과제:대학 교육의 질을 중심으로" 33 (33): 17-24, 2006

    9 성태제, "연구방법론" 학지사 2006

    10 이홍민, "역량평가:인적자본 역량모델 개발과 역량평가" 리드리드출판 2009

    1 Spencer, L. M., "핵심역량 모델의 개발과 활용" PSI 컨설팅 1998

    2 김용익, "초등학교 교원들의 기술적 교양에 대한 교육요구 분석" 한국실과교육학회 14 (14): 6-6, 2001

    3 진성희, "초등 교수역량요소 도출 및 예비초등교사와 초등교사간 교수역량 인식 비교" 한국초등교육학회 22 (22): 343-368, 2009

    4 강석주, "중등학교 담임교사 역량 탐구: 일반계 고등학교 담임교사 역량을 중심으로" 한국교육학회 42 (42): 237-264, 2004

    5 백순근, "중등학교 교사의 교수역량 구성요인에 대한 이론적 고찰" 교육연구소 8 (8): 47-69, 2007

    6 노혜란, "인적자원개발을 위한 교수 역량(teaching competency) 모델 개발" 한국직업능력개발원 7 (7): 1-28, 2004

    7 최정임, "인적자원 개발을 위한 요구분석 실천가이드" 학지사 2002

    8 강상진, "우리 대학의 현황과 과제:대학 교육의 질을 중심으로" 33 (33): 17-24, 2006

    9 성태제, "연구방법론" 학지사 2006

    10 이홍민, "역량평가:인적자본 역량모델 개발과 역량평가" 리드리드출판 2009

    11 오헌석, "역량중심 인적자원개발의 비판과 쟁점 분석" 한국경영교육학회 9 (9): 191-214, 2007

    12 임공수, "역량중심 인재전략" 올리브나무 2008

    13 안희정, "역량모델의 개념과 구축방법론에 대한 개관" 42 : 43-59, 2003

    14 윤필현, "역량기반의 인적자원관리(CBHRM) 체제 개발" 한국농·산업교육학회 40 (40): 167-194, 2008

    15 김현주, "역량기반 인적자원관리(CBHRM)의 도입과 발전:한국 기업을 위한 상황론적 접근법" 3 (3): 120-158, 2003

    16 박동건, "역량과 역량모델링의 정체 및 활용" 1-21, 2001

    17 김남조, "문화유산해설사 교육프로그램의 평가 : 중요도- 성취도 분석방법을 중심으로" 대한관광경영학회 20 (20): 307-324, 2005

    18 최미나, "대학에서의 교수역량(teaching competency)분석을 통한 효과적인 교수역량 진단 방안 탐색" (특집) : 144-164, 2006

    19 임우섭, "대학 교수의 핵심 강의역량 분석" 한국교육행정학회 25 (25): 413-434, 2007

    20 양병화, "다변량 자료분석의 이해와 활용" 학지사 1998

    21 김진모, "기업의 인적자원 개발을 위한 역량 중심의 교육과정 개발" 한국직업교육학회 20 (20): 109-128, 2002

    22 엄미리, "국내 교수설계자 역량개발을 위한 교육요구 분석" 한국직업능력개발원 12 (12): 1-23, 2009

    23 문수백, "구조방정식모델링의 이해와 적용" 학지사 2009

    24 Barrows, H. S., "tutorial process. Springfield" Southern Illinois University School of Medicine 1992

    25 McLagan, P. A., "models. In Models for HRD practice Vol. 3" American Society for Training and Development 1989

    26 Smith, K. S., "Validating teacher competencies for faculty members in higher education: A national study using the Delphi method" 19 : 223-234, 1995

    27 Mezirow, J., "Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning" Jossey-Bass 1991

    28 Tigelaar, D. E., "The development and validation of a framework for teaching competencies in higher education" 48 (48): 253-268, 2004

    29 Hamel, G., "The core competence of corporation" 68 (68): 79-91, 1990

    30 Boyatzis, R. E., "The competent manager: A model for effective performance" John Wiley & Sons 1982

    31 Dubois, D. D., "The competency casebook: Twelve studies in competency-based performance improvement" Human Resource Development Press 1993

    32 McClelland, D. C., "Testing for competence rather than intelligence" 28 (28): 1-14, 1973

    33 Van Buren, M., "State of the industry: Report 2001. Alexandria" American Society for Training and Development 2001

    34 Kogan, M., "Reforming Higher Education" Jessica Kinsley Publications 2000

    35 Layfield, K. D., "Inservice needs and perceived competencies of South Carolina agricultural educators" 43 (43): 46-55, 2002

    36 Newman, M. E., "Inservice education needs of teachers of pilot agriscience courses in Mississippi" 35 (35): 54-60, 1994

    37 Waters, R. G., "Identifying staff development needs of Cooperative Extension faculty using a modified Borich needs assessment model" 30 (30): 26-32, 1989

    38 Barrick, R. K., "Development of a systematic approach to identify technical inservice needs of teachers" 24 (24): 13-19, 1983

    39 Stritter, F. T., "Determining essential faculty competencies" 3 (3): 232-238, 1991

    40 Clayton, M. J., "Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education" 17 (17): 373-386, 1997

    41 Murry, J. W., "Delphi: A versatile method for conducting qualitative research" 18 (18): 423-436, 1995

    42 Dubois, D. D., "Competency-based human resource management" Davies-Black Publishing 2004

    43 Dubois, D. D., "Competency-based competency improvement: A strategy for organizational change. Amherst" Human Resource Development Press 1993

    44 Rothwell, W., "Competency identification, modeling and assessment in the USA" 3 (3): 90-105, 1999

    45 Sporn, B., "Ch. 8: Trends relating to higher education reform in Europe: an overview in Europe: An overview. in: Globalization and reform in higher education" Society for Research in Higher Education & Open University Press 117-129, 2003

    46 Garton, B. L., "An assessment of the inservice needs of beginning teachers of agriculture using two assessment models" 38 (38): 51-58, 1997

    47 김계수, "Amos 7.0 구조방정식 모형 분석" 한나래출판사 2007

    48 Alibaygi, A., "African Journal of Agricultural Research" 3 (3): 681-687, 2008

    49 Borich, G. D., "A needs assessment for conducting follow-up studies" 31 (31): 39-42, 1980

    50 Collins, M., "A critical analysis of competency-based systems in adult education" 33 (33): 174-183, 1983

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼