전자민주주의의 도래와 직접민주주의의 도입의 검토

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

I was greatly shocked when I heard E-Democracy Over 50 years ago, we, koreans, started democracy but our political condition is not
up to our first Ideal That means dictatorship or quasi-democracy, in this reason, I decided to study E-Democracy to be a little help to korean democracy IN korean constitutional law, Article I, clause I has it that Korea is democratic republic, and Article I, clause 2 has it that Sovereignty rests with the people However the real situation is different. I think
that it is our urgent need to replace formal Sovereignty with substantial Sovereignty To realize substantial Sovereignty, We need E-Democracy which will. I believe, satisfy our real political demand The reason why the principle of Sovereignty became formal. I think mainly, is that we have no effective way to take part in political decision. Namely although citizens want to participate in political decision, they can do so only m election and an opinion poll etc, not through direct Democracy. only through these rare chance, citizens cannot become ideal citizens So ultimately Democracy cannot be completed In this reason, direct Democracy is essential in completing Democracy.
Existing theanes treat principle of Sovereignty. and representative
system and direct Democracy separately. but principle of Sovereignty is closely connected with representative system and direct Democracy
because whether principle of Sovereignty is formal or active. functional and substantial. can be defined by how much representative system and direct Democracy are partitioned.
My assertion is that semi-directory system is the best political
system because representative system and direct Democracy are not perfect Itself Specially, In this thesis, I treat direct Democracy not because direct Democracy can replace representative system, but because direct Democracy can make up for the defect of representative system.
The main reason why direct Democracy can not be practiced is not
only ideological. hegemonic problem but also we have no efficient way to practice direct Democracy In this point, E-Democracy is most
needed to practice direct Democracy. Specially E-Democracy provides e-vote and space for debate on which direct Democracy IS based. In addition, mature people' will to take part In politlcal decision, makes direct Democracy practicable Through all changes, we can challenge bloodless revolution and achieve the purpose of substantial Democracy

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "하버마스의 공론장의 구조변동" 나남출판 2001

2 "사이버민주주의: 그 의미와 헌법적 전망" 2001년5월

3 "主權と 自由の 現代的 課題" 1994.

4 "“의회와 거버넌스 거버넌스의 정치학”" 法文社 2002.

5 "the social bases of politics"

6 "comprehensive review of American initiatives and referendums" Harvard press 1989.

7 "Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States" Johns Hopkins University Press 1984.

8 "The Theory of Democracy Revisited" Chatham House Publishers 1987.

9 "The Republic of Plato Edited by Allan Bloom" Basic Books 1968.

10 "The New Challenge of Direct Democracy" Polity Press 1996

11 "The Future of Democracy -A Defence of the rules of the Game" Polity Press 1997

12 "The Decline of American Political Parties" Harvard University Press 1990.

13 "Republic.com" Princeton University Press 2001

14 "Party Policy and Goverment Coalitions" Macmillan 1992

15 "On Democracy" 동명사 1999

16 "Essays on Reason and Politics" MIT Press 1986.

17 "Electronic Whistle Stops: The Impact of the Internet on American Politics" Praeger Publishers 1998

18 "Digital Democracy :Discourse and Decision Making in the Information Age" Routledge 1999

19 "Designing Democracy" Oxford university press 2001

20 "Democracy and Its Critics(" 문학과 지성사 1999

21 "Cyberpolitics" Rowman & Littlefield Publisher Inc 1997

22 "CyberPolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 1998

23 "Athority in a Good Society" Yale University Press tion : 1970.

24 "American Politics" Wilton 1996