RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    동아시아 안보질서에서 강대국과 중견국의 헤징전략 = The Hedging Strategy of Great and Middle Powers in the East Asian Security Order

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103963214

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Over the last 20 years the strategic landscape of the world has transformed, as the East Asia replaced the Atlantic as the locus of global power, challenges, and opportunities. Above all the tectonic shift was caused by the China's rise and current economic weakness in the United States and Europe is further accentuating changes of the regional security order in the East Asia. Linked to the future of the East Asian security landscape is the core issue of how the U.S. and China will chart its path and toward what goal. Many middle powers like Japan, India, ASEAN states and so on in the East Asia also can't help being affected by the strategic relationship between the U.S. and China.


    This article examines to the strategic behaviors of the great and middle powers in the East Asia from the perspective of hedging strategy. The hedging strategy extends the logic of traditional balance of power theory, while maintaining a strong emphasis on structural incentives that critics found lacking in the soft balancing approach. Most states in the East Asia have calibrated their security and strategy in changing the U.S.-China relationship. In particular they are pursuing soft, institutional, limited balancing and diplomatically comprehensive engagement as part of a hedging strategy toward China. In this context, I analyze the components of hedging strategy in great and middle powers and try to compare their different goals of hedging strategy. Also I suggest three hedging behavior patterns that middle powers have adapted as an alternative security strategy and try to examine their different hedging characters.
    번역하기

    Over the last 20 years the strategic landscape of the world has transformed, as the East Asia replaced the Atlantic as the locus of global power, challenges, and opportunities. Above all the tectonic shift was caused by the China's rise and current ec...

    Over the last 20 years the strategic landscape of the world has transformed, as the East Asia replaced the Atlantic as the locus of global power, challenges, and opportunities. Above all the tectonic shift was caused by the China's rise and current economic weakness in the United States and Europe is further accentuating changes of the regional security order in the East Asia. Linked to the future of the East Asian security landscape is the core issue of how the U.S. and China will chart its path and toward what goal. Many middle powers like Japan, India, ASEAN states and so on in the East Asia also can't help being affected by the strategic relationship between the U.S. and China.


    This article examines to the strategic behaviors of the great and middle powers in the East Asia from the perspective of hedging strategy. The hedging strategy extends the logic of traditional balance of power theory, while maintaining a strong emphasis on structural incentives that critics found lacking in the soft balancing approach. Most states in the East Asia have calibrated their security and strategy in changing the U.S.-China relationship. In particular they are pursuing soft, institutional, limited balancing and diplomatically comprehensive engagement as part of a hedging strategy toward China. In this context, I analyze the components of hedging strategy in great and middle powers and try to compare their different goals of hedging strategy. Also I suggest three hedging behavior patterns that middle powers have adapted as an alternative security strategy and try to examine their different hedging characters.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이수형, "중추적 중견국가와 한국의 새로운 외교안보 전 략모색: 가교전략과 헤징전략을 중심으로" 7 (7): 233-260, 2011

    2 장달중, "미·중 사이에서 고뇌하는 한국의 외교·안보, 연미화중으로 푼다" 매경출판 2011

    3 김치욱, "국제정치의 분석단위로서 중견국가(Middle Power) : 그 개념화와 시사점" 한국국제정치학회 49 (49): 7-36, 2009

    4 전재성, "강대국의부상과대응메커니즘:이론적분석과유럽의 사례" 국가안전보장문제연구소 51 (51): 3-33, 2008

    5 Goh, Evelyn, "Understanding ‘Hedging’ in Asia-Pacific Security" Pacific Forum CSIS(Center for Strategic & International Studies) 2006

    6 Goh, Evelyn, "U.S. Strategic Relations with a Rising China: Trajectories and Impacts on Asia-Pacific Security, In The Rise of China and International Security: America and Asia Respond" Routledge 59-93, 2009

    7 Waltz, Kenneth N., "Theory of International Politics" Addison-Wesley 1979

    8 Layne, Christopher, "The Waning of U.S. Hegemony-Myth or Realist?: A Review Essay" 34 (34): 147-172, 2009

    9 Khalilzad, Zalmay M., "The United States and a Rising China: Strategic and Military Implications" RAND’s Project Air Force 1999

    10 Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" W.W. Norton 2001

    1 이수형, "중추적 중견국가와 한국의 새로운 외교안보 전 략모색: 가교전략과 헤징전략을 중심으로" 7 (7): 233-260, 2011

    2 장달중, "미·중 사이에서 고뇌하는 한국의 외교·안보, 연미화중으로 푼다" 매경출판 2011

    3 김치욱, "국제정치의 분석단위로서 중견국가(Middle Power) : 그 개념화와 시사점" 한국국제정치학회 49 (49): 7-36, 2009

    4 전재성, "강대국의부상과대응메커니즘:이론적분석과유럽의 사례" 국가안전보장문제연구소 51 (51): 3-33, 2008

    5 Goh, Evelyn, "Understanding ‘Hedging’ in Asia-Pacific Security" Pacific Forum CSIS(Center for Strategic & International Studies) 2006

    6 Goh, Evelyn, "U.S. Strategic Relations with a Rising China: Trajectories and Impacts on Asia-Pacific Security, In The Rise of China and International Security: America and Asia Respond" Routledge 59-93, 2009

    7 Waltz, Kenneth N., "Theory of International Politics" Addison-Wesley 1979

    8 Layne, Christopher, "The Waning of U.S. Hegemony-Myth or Realist?: A Review Essay" 34 (34): 147-172, 2009

    9 Khalilzad, Zalmay M., "The United States and a Rising China: Strategic and Military Implications" RAND’s Project Air Force 1999

    10 Mearsheimer, John J., "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" W.W. Norton 2001

    11 Xuetong, Yan, "The Rise of China and Its Power Status" 1 (1): 5-33, 2006

    12 Zakaria, Fareed, "The Post-American World" W.W. Norton 2008

    13 Walt, Stephen M., "The Origins of Alliances" Cornell University Press 1987

    14 The White House, "The National Security Strategy of the United States of America" The White House 2006

    15 Friedberg, Aaron L., "The Geopolitics of Strategic Asia, 2000-2020, In Asia’s Rising Power and America’s Continued Purpose" The National Bureau of Asian Research 25-44, 2010

    16 Kuik, Cheng-Chwee, "The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China" 30 (30): 159-185, 2008

    17 Elrod, Richard B., "The Concert of Europe: A Fresh Look at an International System" 28 (28): 159-174, 1976

    18 U.S. Department of Defense, "Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense" U.S. Department of Defense 2012

    19 Medeiros, Evan S., "Strategic Hedging and the Future of Asia-Pacific Stability" 29 (29): 145-167, 2006

    20 T. J. Pempel, "Soft Balancing, Hedging, and Institutional Darwinism: The Economic-Security Nexus and East Asian Regionalism" 동아시아연구원 10 (10): 209-238, 2010

    21 Paul, T. V., "Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy" 30 (30): 46-71, 2005

    22 Pape, Robert A., "Soft Balancing Against the United States" 30 (30): 7-45, 2005

    23 Atanassova-Cornelis, Elena, "Reshaping the East Asian Security Order: USChina Hedging and the EU’s Strategic Choices" 10 : 219-242, 2011

    24 Schweller, Randall L., "Realism and the Present Great Power System: Growth and Positional Conflict Over Scarce Resources, In Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War" Columbia University Press 28-68, 1999

    25 U.S. Department of Defense, "Quadrennial Defense Review Report" U.S. Department of Defense 2006

    26 The White House, "National Strategy For Global Supply Chain Security"

    27 Goh, Evelyn, "Meeting the China Challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian Regional Security Strategies" East- West Center 2005

    28 Mochizuki, Mike M., "Japan’s Shifting Strategy Toward the Rise of China" 30 (30): 739-776, 2007

    29 The Tokyo Foundation, "Japan’s Security Strategy Toward China: Integration, Balancing, and Deterrence in the Era of Power Shift" The Tokyo Foundation 2011

    30 David Fouse, "Japan's New Defense Policy for 2010: Hardening the Hedge" 한국국방연구원 23 (23): 489-501, 2011

    31 Paul, T.V., "Introduction: The Enduring Axioms of Balance of Power Theory and Their Contemporary Relevance, In Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century" Stanford University Press 1-25, 2004

    32 He, Kai, "Institutional Balancing and International Relations Theory: Economic Interdependence and Balance of Power Strategies in Southeast Asia" 14 (14): 489-518, 2008

    33 Goh, Evelyn, "Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies" 32 (32): 113-157, 2008

    34 MacDonald, Paul K., "Graceful Decline? The Surprising Success of Great Power Retrenchment" 35 (35): 7-44, 2011

    35 Layne, Christopher, "Graceful Decline: The End of Pax Americana" 9 (9): 30-33, 2010

    36 Kirshner, Jonathan, "Globalization and National Security" Routledge 2006

    37 Resnick, Evan, "Defining Engagement" 54 (54): 551-566, 2001

    38 Foot, Rosemary, "Chinese Strategies in a US-Hegemonic Global Order: Accommodating and Hedging" 82 (82): 77-94, 2006

    39 Denmark, Abraham M., "China’s Arrival: A Framework for a Global Relationship, In China’s Arrival: A Strategic Framework for A Global Relationship" Center for a New American Security 157-180, 2009

    40 Clinton, Hillary, "America’s Pacific Century" (189) : 56-63, 2011

    41 Lieberthal, Kenneth, "Addressing U.S.-China Strategic Distrust" The Brookings Institution 2012

    42 전재성, "19세기 유럽협조체제에 대한 국제제도론적 분석: 현실주의와 구성주의 제도론의 시각에서" 15 (15): 33-60, 1999

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-07-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.92 0.92 0.91
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.88 0.95 1.328 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼