RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    과학에 관한 인식 조사 도구를 활용한 교수 프로그램의 효과 - 과학의 대상과 과학의 방법을 동시에 고려한 분석 -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3255448

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigates the effect of instructional program using Nott & Wellington`s your nature of science profile to facilitate the understanding about the nature of science for elementary preservice teachers. To do this, this study used posttest only control group design. The students in control group studied the topic by instructional program using textbook and reference book. Experimental group studied by instructional program: (1) evaluating personally one`s understanding of the nature of science using Nott and Wellington`s your nature of science profile; (2) studying the way of understanding the nature of science focusing five dimensions presented in it: (3) knowing other`s understanding the nature of science; (4) discussing and evaluating reflectively the various aspect about it. Because the true understanding about the nature of science is not only to know about the method of science but also to know the target of science, We planned to evaluate the effect of instruction by such dichotomous way as evaluating simultaneously the understanding about the method of science and the target of science. Therefore the questionnaire to evaluate the effect of instruction consisted two pairs of open-ended questions: first pair is consisted of questions for the representation and judgement of scientific theory, second pair is consisted of questions for components and sources of scientific manipulation of the structure of science. The results of questionnaires by experimental group(n=75) and control group(n=77) are as follows: (1) Analysing responses about first pair of questions in dichotomous way, we identified four different pattems in students` understanding about scientific theory. And the instructional program using Nott & Wellington`s your nature of science profile is not significantly effective in the distribution of patterns of understanding about scientific theory, but effective in driving out scientifically valid understanding, naturalistic realism, about scientific theory from the students having realistic aspect in representation of scientific theory; (2) Analysing responses about second pair of questions in dichotomous way, we identified five different patterns in students`s understanding about structure of science. And the instructional program using Nott & Wellington`s your nature of science profile is significantly effective in the distribution of patterns of understanding about structure of science, and effective in driving out scientifically valid understanding, dualistic-circular view or dualistic-circular view, about structure of science from the students having dualistic or dualistic aspect in components of structure of science.
    번역하기

    This study investigates the effect of instructional program using Nott & Wellington`s your nature of science profile to facilitate the understanding about the nature of science for elementary preservice teachers. To do this, this study used posttest o...

    This study investigates the effect of instructional program using Nott & Wellington`s your nature of science profile to facilitate the understanding about the nature of science for elementary preservice teachers. To do this, this study used posttest only control group design. The students in control group studied the topic by instructional program using textbook and reference book. Experimental group studied by instructional program: (1) evaluating personally one`s understanding of the nature of science using Nott and Wellington`s your nature of science profile; (2) studying the way of understanding the nature of science focusing five dimensions presented in it: (3) knowing other`s understanding the nature of science; (4) discussing and evaluating reflectively the various aspect about it. Because the true understanding about the nature of science is not only to know about the method of science but also to know the target of science, We planned to evaluate the effect of instruction by such dichotomous way as evaluating simultaneously the understanding about the method of science and the target of science. Therefore the questionnaire to evaluate the effect of instruction consisted two pairs of open-ended questions: first pair is consisted of questions for the representation and judgement of scientific theory, second pair is consisted of questions for components and sources of scientific manipulation of the structure of science. The results of questionnaires by experimental group(n=75) and control group(n=77) are as follows: (1) Analysing responses about first pair of questions in dichotomous way, we identified four different pattems in students` understanding about scientific theory. And the instructional program using Nott & Wellington`s your nature of science profile is not significantly effective in the distribution of patterns of understanding about scientific theory, but effective in driving out scientifically valid understanding, naturalistic realism, about scientific theory from the students having realistic aspect in representation of scientific theory; (2) Analysing responses about second pair of questions in dichotomous way, we identified five different patterns in students`s understanding about structure of science. And the instructional program using Nott & Wellington`s your nature of science profile is significantly effective in the distribution of patterns of understanding about structure of science, and effective in driving out scientifically valid understanding, dualistic-circular view or dualistic-circular view, about structure of science from the students having dualistic or dualistic aspect in components of structure of science.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼