RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Adaptive Strategies and Anticipatory Timing in Pedestrian Collision Avoidance: A Systematic Review

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110179179

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background : Pedestrian collision avoidance is an anticipatory, perception–action process shaped by spatial geometry, social context, and sensory–attentional constraints. Yet evidence on how (strategy) and when (timing) avoidance is initiated has been dispersed across paradigms.
    Methods : Following PRISMA 2020, we synthesized 14 empirical studies (2005–2025) spanning controlled lab, virtual reality, and ecological settings that reported quantitative or qualitative outcomes on avoidance strategy and/or initiation timing during human walking.
    Results : Two mechanisms consistently dominated: directional adjustment (steering) and speed modulation. Steering was the default response across dyadic and oblique encounters, while speed modulation occurred preferentially for yielding roles, acute angles, or constrained space, and combined responses arose when residual risk persisted. Initiation was anticipatory, commonly occurring when the Minimum Predicted Distance (MPD) dropped below a small threshold (≈<1 m), with MPD trajectories showing observation, reaction, and regulation phases, indicating proactive control rather than reflexive responses. In multi-agent contexts, pedestrians typically resolved conflicts sequentially, although certain formations invited simultaneous co-adaptation, as revealed by joint analysis of MPD and dynamic gap affordances. Under path constraints, walkers recruited body rotation, which scaled with corridor width and became critical for safe passing in narrow spaces. Ecological data showed robust role asymmetries: singles bore greater avoidance effort, and higher dyad interaction weakened dyads’ responsiveness; deviation magnitude scaled with social-interaction level even at comparable risk.
    Conclusions : Evidence converged on a context–strategy–timing framework: low MPD triggers avoidance; context (geometry, role, social engagement, constraint) selects the mix of steering and speed control; and postural freedom (rotation) engage as space tightens. This synthesis offers mechanistic targets for predictive pedestrian models, human–robot navigation policies, and rehabilitation programs that train timely steering first, with speed and rotation layered under elevated risk or constraint.
    번역하기

    Background : Pedestrian collision avoidance is an anticipatory, perception–action process shaped by spatial geometry, social context, and sensory–attentional constraints. Yet evidence on how (strategy) and when (timing) avoidance is initiated has ...

    Background : Pedestrian collision avoidance is an anticipatory, perception–action process shaped by spatial geometry, social context, and sensory–attentional constraints. Yet evidence on how (strategy) and when (timing) avoidance is initiated has been dispersed across paradigms.
    Methods : Following PRISMA 2020, we synthesized 14 empirical studies (2005–2025) spanning controlled lab, virtual reality, and ecological settings that reported quantitative or qualitative outcomes on avoidance strategy and/or initiation timing during human walking.
    Results : Two mechanisms consistently dominated: directional adjustment (steering) and speed modulation. Steering was the default response across dyadic and oblique encounters, while speed modulation occurred preferentially for yielding roles, acute angles, or constrained space, and combined responses arose when residual risk persisted. Initiation was anticipatory, commonly occurring when the Minimum Predicted Distance (MPD) dropped below a small threshold (≈<1 m), with MPD trajectories showing observation, reaction, and regulation phases, indicating proactive control rather than reflexive responses. In multi-agent contexts, pedestrians typically resolved conflicts sequentially, although certain formations invited simultaneous co-adaptation, as revealed by joint analysis of MPD and dynamic gap affordances. Under path constraints, walkers recruited body rotation, which scaled with corridor width and became critical for safe passing in narrow spaces. Ecological data showed robust role asymmetries: singles bore greater avoidance effort, and higher dyad interaction weakened dyads’ responsiveness; deviation magnitude scaled with social-interaction level even at comparable risk.
    Conclusions : Evidence converged on a context–strategy–timing framework: low MPD triggers avoidance; context (geometry, role, social engagement, constraint) selects the mix of steering and speed control; and postural freedom (rotation) engage as space tightens. This synthesis offers mechanistic targets for predictive pedestrian models, human–robot navigation policies, and rehabilitation programs that train timely steering first, with speed and rotation layered under elevated risk or constraint.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼