RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The abductive imperative of world history: Undergraduate history curricula for the new millennium.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10560446

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      소속기관이 구독 중이 아닌 경우 오후 4시부터 익일 오전 9시까지 원문보기가 가능합니다.

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In assessing the field of history in the United States in the introduction of <italic>A Global History</italic> (1999), L. S. Stavrianos lauds the successful transition from an irrelevant and misleading, traditional West-oriented history to a new global-perspective history; while in the new introduction to the updated edition of <italic>Covering Islam</italic> (1997), Edward W. Said laments that the field of history in the United States has become even more insensitive and belligerently hostile towards non-Western societies, giving rise to ever greater misrepresentations, distortions, and stereotypes. How can these extremely divergent views be reconciled? Treating the field of history in the United States as a culture of scholarship, an examination of undergraduate history textbooks and curricula reveals an orientalist globalism. A more all-inclusive, encyclopedic non-Western history has been truly integrated into the field of history in the United States, but the specific process which has integrated non-Western history has given rise to greater misrepresentations, distortions, and stereotypes. Non-Western history, Third World history, and area studies have become required fields of study for gaining perspective on the modernity of the West; and non-Western history, Third World history, and area studies have been distortingly delineated into pre-colonial, colonial, and post-colonial periods to conform to the periodization of the West. While many colleges and universities in the United States have retained the Western Civilization course, others have replaced the Western Civilization course with the World History course. This change, however, remains cosmetic, as a critical analysis of approaches to World History and of World History textbooks suggests little structural change in the curricula. As a means for remedying the egregious failings of orientalist globalism, an abductive argument is made for the development of the field of World History as a necessary macrohistorical foundation for history curricula for the new millennium.
      번역하기

      In assessing the field of history in the United States in the introduction of <italic>A Global History</italic> (1999), L. S. Stavrianos lauds the successful transition from an irrelevant and misleading, traditional West-oriented history ...

      In assessing the field of history in the United States in the introduction of <italic>A Global History</italic> (1999), L. S. Stavrianos lauds the successful transition from an irrelevant and misleading, traditional West-oriented history to a new global-perspective history; while in the new introduction to the updated edition of <italic>Covering Islam</italic> (1997), Edward W. Said laments that the field of history in the United States has become even more insensitive and belligerently hostile towards non-Western societies, giving rise to ever greater misrepresentations, distortions, and stereotypes. How can these extremely divergent views be reconciled? Treating the field of history in the United States as a culture of scholarship, an examination of undergraduate history textbooks and curricula reveals an orientalist globalism. A more all-inclusive, encyclopedic non-Western history has been truly integrated into the field of history in the United States, but the specific process which has integrated non-Western history has given rise to greater misrepresentations, distortions, and stereotypes. Non-Western history, Third World history, and area studies have become required fields of study for gaining perspective on the modernity of the West; and non-Western history, Third World history, and area studies have been distortingly delineated into pre-colonial, colonial, and post-colonial periods to conform to the periodization of the West. While many colleges and universities in the United States have retained the Western Civilization course, others have replaced the Western Civilization course with the World History course. This change, however, remains cosmetic, as a critical analysis of approaches to World History and of World History textbooks suggests little structural change in the curricula. As a means for remedying the egregious failings of orientalist globalism, an abductive argument is made for the development of the field of World History as a necessary macrohistorical foundation for history curricula for the new millennium.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼