RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      주민등록번호 도용의 문제점 및 개선방안 = Unauthorized Use of Residence Registration Numbers and Privacy Protection

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76482804

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In Korea, the Residence Registration Number is made of birth date, sex, residence, etc. The public ID number, which each and all Korean nationals should enroll in the Administration, could endanger the privacy of each citizen. In the private sector, the Internet service providers usually make it a rule to demand user's Residence Registration Number. Accordingly, some users submit virtual numbers instead of their real numbers by using an automatic registration number generator, and others make an unauthorized use of other's ID numbers. As a matter of fact, 56 percent of claimants of violation of privacy protection, who filed with the Personal Data Protection Center for ten months in 2003, complained their Residence Registration Numbers had been illegally used or stolen.
      Why does the Internet service provider demand the Residence Registration Numbers of users as a required information? Is there any appropriate identifiable information other than the Residence Registration Number?
      There are so many issues and problems with regard to the unauthorized use of Residence Registration Numbers. First, the ID numbers were originally devised not for the commercial activities but for the administrative purpose. Second, the prevailing use of the automatic generators would make it difficult to prohibit the unauthorized use of the ID numbers. Third, Article 21 of the Residence Registration Act punishes only the violators who incurred financial damages to others by making unauthorized use of other's ID numbers. The current law cannot punish individual users of such automatic generating software. Surprisingly, the standard provisions of Internet shopping mall suggested by the Fair Trade Commission include the Residence Registration Numbers as required personal information. In other words, the government acknowledges the general use of the Residence Registration Numbers.
      However, it should be noted that in foreign countries it is free to do transactions in the shopping malls or Internet portal sites without any personal ID numbers like the Residence Registration Number of Korea. It is dangerous for the protection of privacy to use the Residence Registration Number, in particular, for the profiling of personal information.
      Therefore, we have to take account of the following measures to prevent the unauthorized use of other's Residence Registration Numbers:
      - The Internet service providers should not be allowed to collect individual user's Residence Registration Numbers. Also it might be punishable to submit other's ID number without permission.
      - Alternative ID's like credit cards or electronic signatures should be encouraged or recommended in the electronic commerce.
      - Any other numbers covering no personal information could be managed and operated by a third sector institution like an escrow account suggested by FTC in the e-commerce transactions.
      번역하기

      In Korea, the Residence Registration Number is made of birth date, sex, residence, etc. The public ID number, which each and all Korean nationals should enroll in the Administration, could endanger the privacy of each citizen. In the private sector, t...

      In Korea, the Residence Registration Number is made of birth date, sex, residence, etc. The public ID number, which each and all Korean nationals should enroll in the Administration, could endanger the privacy of each citizen. In the private sector, the Internet service providers usually make it a rule to demand user's Residence Registration Number. Accordingly, some users submit virtual numbers instead of their real numbers by using an automatic registration number generator, and others make an unauthorized use of other's ID numbers. As a matter of fact, 56 percent of claimants of violation of privacy protection, who filed with the Personal Data Protection Center for ten months in 2003, complained their Residence Registration Numbers had been illegally used or stolen.
      Why does the Internet service provider demand the Residence Registration Numbers of users as a required information? Is there any appropriate identifiable information other than the Residence Registration Number?
      There are so many issues and problems with regard to the unauthorized use of Residence Registration Numbers. First, the ID numbers were originally devised not for the commercial activities but for the administrative purpose. Second, the prevailing use of the automatic generators would make it difficult to prohibit the unauthorized use of the ID numbers. Third, Article 21 of the Residence Registration Act punishes only the violators who incurred financial damages to others by making unauthorized use of other's ID numbers. The current law cannot punish individual users of such automatic generating software. Surprisingly, the standard provisions of Internet shopping mall suggested by the Fair Trade Commission include the Residence Registration Numbers as required personal information. In other words, the government acknowledges the general use of the Residence Registration Numbers.
      However, it should be noted that in foreign countries it is free to do transactions in the shopping malls or Internet portal sites without any personal ID numbers like the Residence Registration Number of Korea. It is dangerous for the protection of privacy to use the Residence Registration Number, in particular, for the profiling of personal information.
      Therefore, we have to take account of the following measures to prevent the unauthorized use of other's Residence Registration Numbers:
      - The Internet service providers should not be allowed to collect individual user's Residence Registration Numbers. Also it might be punishable to submit other's ID number without permission.
      - Alternative ID's like credit cards or electronic signatures should be encouraged or recommended in the electronic commerce.
      - Any other numbers covering no personal information could be managed and operated by a third sector institution like an escrow account suggested by FTC in the e-commerce transactions.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 주민등록번호 체계관련 국내·외 현황
      • Ⅲ. 민간부문에서의 주민등록번호 수집·이용 및 도용현황
      • Ⅳ. 주민등록번호 도용으로 나타난 문제점
      • Ⅴ. 주민등록번호 도용에 대한 개선방안
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 주민등록번호 체계관련 국내·외 현황
      • Ⅲ. 민간부문에서의 주민등록번호 수집·이용 및 도용현황
      • Ⅳ. 주민등록번호 도용으로 나타난 문제점
      • Ⅴ. 주민등록번호 도용에 대한 개선방안
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼