RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 반공영화 담론의 형성과 전쟁영화 장르의 기원 1949~1956 = A Study of the Formation of Discourse on Anti-communist Films and the Origin of War Film in South Korea between 1949 and 1956

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82448745

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper has three main purposes. Firstly, it examines the formation of discourse on anti-communist films. This discussion aims to prove that the term anti-communist film was used as an undoubted criterion rather than a generic term in the 1950s. The controversy on <Piagol>(1955) and <The Box of Death> (1955) played a main role in circulation of the term, anti-communist films. However, it was hard to call the term anti-communist film as a generic term during the 1950s. It simply meant that the film inspired anti-communist consciousness. Besides, it was the ideology-oriented and purpose-oriented classification standard rather than designated as popular genre. However, this term was not used without any historical background. The term anti-communist film was on the basis of communist guerilla/espionage films. Secondly, this study explores the origin of war film. This genre was formed on the basis of wartime documentary. There were a few combat films produced in the middle of the 1950s. Indeed, war films considered as combat films obtained the distinguished generic status rather than being designated anti-communist films in itself in the 1950s. Few people considered war films as anti-communist films. However, the controversial attention on anti-communist film was almost directed to the communist guerilla/espionage films. In other words, the original emblem of anti-communist film was not war films but communist guerilla/espionage films. Thirdly, the paper illustrates how communist guerilla/espionage films and war films represent the enemy. While communist guerilla/espionage films reflected the national urgency which has to search out the enemy, war films focused on the blood alliance between South Korean Army and U. S. Army more than being represented the enemy directly. The former included the perspective of civil war, while the latter involved the characteristics of international war. Consequently, although war film was linked to anti-communist film in some degree, it was forming the status of distinguished film genre.
    번역하기

    This paper has three main purposes. Firstly, it examines the formation of discourse on anti-communist films. This discussion aims to prove that the term anti-communist film was used as an undoubted criterion rather than a generic term in the 1950s. Th...

    This paper has three main purposes. Firstly, it examines the formation of discourse on anti-communist films. This discussion aims to prove that the term anti-communist film was used as an undoubted criterion rather than a generic term in the 1950s. The controversy on <Piagol>(1955) and <The Box of Death> (1955) played a main role in circulation of the term, anti-communist films. However, it was hard to call the term anti-communist film as a generic term during the 1950s. It simply meant that the film inspired anti-communist consciousness. Besides, it was the ideology-oriented and purpose-oriented classification standard rather than designated as popular genre. However, this term was not used without any historical background. The term anti-communist film was on the basis of communist guerilla/espionage films. Secondly, this study explores the origin of war film. This genre was formed on the basis of wartime documentary. There were a few combat films produced in the middle of the 1950s. Indeed, war films considered as combat films obtained the distinguished generic status rather than being designated anti-communist films in itself in the 1950s. Few people considered war films as anti-communist films. However, the controversial attention on anti-communist film was almost directed to the communist guerilla/espionage films. In other words, the original emblem of anti-communist film was not war films but communist guerilla/espionage films. Thirdly, the paper illustrates how communist guerilla/espionage films and war films represent the enemy. While communist guerilla/espionage films reflected the national urgency which has to search out the enemy, war films focused on the blood alliance between South Korean Army and U. S. Army more than being represented the enemy directly. The former included the perspective of civil war, while the latter involved the characteristics of international war. Consequently, although war film was linked to anti-communist film in some degree, it was forming the status of distinguished film genre.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼