행정입법에 대한 의회통제와 추상적 규범통제 = Status of Administrative Legislation Review System and Abstract Review on Norm

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Administrative legislation is necessary because to important decisions of the legislature for the annual parliamentary general and abstract norms established in accordance with democratic principles. But Sub delegation of authority the legislature is in direct administration rather than by the regulation of legal norms of lower standards in state affairs. In this case lower standards of professionalism and efficiency, and rules relieve the burden of establishing. In Korea, administrative legislation review system is in force under the National Assembly Act, in which administrative legislation is submitted to the concerned standing committee of the national assembly for review of illegality for Presidential Decrees, etc. and notifying the concerned minister of the resultHs. However, it is not a preliminary review system but an ex post facto review system in which rules are reviewed only after legislation or amendment. It is nothing but a direct control system whose effect is very weak and limited. As a matter of fact, there are a number of cases in which, although the concerned standing committee of the national assembly notifies the administration of its opinions on administrative legislation, the administration does not accept such opinions and any public servant in the administration not following such opinions is not given any disadvantage. Such a weak administrative legislation review system currently provided for in the National Assembly Act has limits to effective control of administrative legislation. The conception of review on Norm is connected with principle of seperation of power`, and the review on Norm which is not based on Constitutional Law is not permitted. The article 107(1) of Koran Constitutional Law controls parliamentary legistlation and The article 107(2) of that does the subordinate Norm of parliamentary legistlation when each one is at issue in a trial`. The abstract review on Norm could function from the legistlation of the Norm concerned, and it could abolish the lasting unconstitutional situation, and it could keep social peace by lessening the legal conflicts of the future and correcting the deviation of social order, it is a kind of vaccine for keeping social peace. It is a very useful and effective way which could make up for the absence situation of no administrative way of remedy as in the case of conflicting situation between mother and her fetus. We had better have it as far as it could not hurt the national representation of the Parliamentary.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한수웅, "현행 헌법재판제도에서 추상적 규범통제의 도입문제" 홍익대학교 법학연구소 7 : 2005

2 정종섭, "헌법학원론" 박영사 2014

3 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 2014

4 윤명선, "헌법재판제도의 개선방향" 경희대 법학연구소 29 (29): 1994

5 김운용, "헌법재판과 추상적 규범통제" 서강대 법학연구소 3 : 2001

6 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법" 박영사 2011

7 정종섭, "헌법소송법" 박영사 2008

8 김현준, "행정입법절차의 쟁점과 과제 - 독일법과의 비교를 중심으로 -" 한국비교공법학회 17 (17): 333-359, 2016

9 김선택, "행정입법에 대한 국회 관여권 - 수정·변경 요구권 유보부 위임의 합헌성 -" 한국비교공법학회 16 (16): 95-124, 2015

10 김선화, "행정입법과 관련한 의회와 행정부와의 관계" 2016

11 배상오, "한국헌법재판제도에 있어서의 문제점과 극복방안" 충남대학교 법학연구소 9 (9): 1999

12 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2010

13 석인선, "미국의 의회 입법권과 위헌법률심사제의 상호관계" 한국헌법학회 10 (10): 511-551, 2004

14 김용섭, "국회법상 행정입법검토제도의 현황과 법정책적 과제" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) (33) : 1-25, 2012

15 장영철, "行政立法에 대한 抽象的 規範統制制度의 導入方案에 관한 硏究" 한국공법학회 37 (37): 155-180, 2008

16 이상천, "抽象的規範統制 導入을 위한 試論＊ -行政立法에 대한 規範統制를 中心으로-" 법학연구소 25 : 59-94, 2011

17 Wolfgang Lower, "Zustandigkeiten und Verfahren des Bundes- verfassungsgerichts" 2005

18 Werner Heun, "Normenkontrolle"

19 "Festschrift 50 Jahre Bundesverfassungsgericht, Bd.1" Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit- Verfassugnsprozeßs 615-639, 2001

20 Voßkuhle, "Die Rechtsverordnung" 2015

21 Christian Starck, "Constitutional Review in the Federal Republic of Germany" 2 : 86-, 1984

22 Maunz, "BVerfGG"