RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      카이로프랙틱 교정이 체중분배에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 = Study on effect of chiropractic manipulative therapy on weight distribution

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100547045

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study is to examine whether the chiropractic cervical vertebral correction
      has an effect on the posture and the balance, the main factors of weight
      distribution by adding stimulation to the nervous system through stimulation of
      proprioceptive sense acceptor of chiropractic correction for scalar vestibuli,
      visuometer, somatesthesia, the main factors of posture control or not.
      This study has a purpose of examining whether the chiropractic correction of
      cervical vertebral has an effect on weight distribution through foot pressure
      measure, one of the evaluation methods of body balancing ability or not. The study
      procedures were carried out for the 40 subjects (male 20, female 19) from Suan
      remedial exercise cure center within Chinese medical clinic of Hanseo University,
      and from Hanseo University students, located in Seosan city, Chungcheongnam-do
      from Oct. 18 to Nov. 20, 2010. Of the selected 40 persons, 26 persons were in
      chiropractic treatment group, and 14 persons were in myofascial release treatment
      group, and among the chiropractic treatment group, 20 persons (male 10, female 10)
      received chiropractic treatment 3 times a week for 4 weeks to verify whether the
      chiropractic cervical vertebral correction has an effect to body balance or not.
      The result of study is as follows.
      As the result of measuring foot pressure of 1 time chiropractic treatement group,
      it changed from 42.13% before treatment to 43.99% after treatment at front foot
      pressure distribution, and from 57.66% to 55.76% at rear foot pressure distribution,
      from 50.40% to 50.68% at left foot pressure distribution, and from 49.63% to
      49.09% at right foot pressure distribution. So, it showed there was no change after
      1 time chiropractic treatment as it was bigger than significance probability p < 0.05.
      Comparing the average difference before and after the treatment, it showed no
      change after 1 time chiropractic treatment because it was bigger than significance
      probability p < 0.05 as front 1.86% increase, rear 1.9% decrease, left 0.28% crease,
      right 0.54% decrease.
      In the result of measuring the foot pressure of the 1 time myofascial release
      treatment group, it showed the change from 40.14% at front foot pressure
      distribution before treatment to 40.48% after treatment, from 60.03% to 59.53% at
      the rear foot pressure distribution, from 49.49% to 51.20% at the left foot pressure
      distribution, from 50.44% to 49.02% at the right foot pressure distribution.
      Comparing the average difference before and after the treatment, there was no
      change after 1 time myofascial release treatment because it was bigger than the change after 1 time myofascial release treatment because it was bigger than the
      significance probability p < 0.05 as front 0.34% increase, rear 0.5% decrease, left
      1.71% increase, and right 1.42% decrease.
      In the result of measuring the foot pressure of total 12 time chiropractic
      treatments group during 4 weeks, it was changed from 40.99% before treatment to
      45.96% after treatment at front foot pressure distribution, from 59.12% to 54.04% at
      rear foot pressure distribution, from 50.81% to 48.25% at left foot pressure
      distribution, and from 49.25% to 51.74% at right foot pressure distribution.
      Comparing the average difference before and after the treatment, it showed it
      didn't have any effect on the change after 4 week- chiropractic treatment because
      the change of front and rear foot pressure measurement was bigger than the
      significance probability p < 0.05 as front 4.97% increase, rear 5.8% decrease, left
      2.56% decrease, and right 2.49% increase, but, the change of right & left foot
      pressure measures was statistically smaller than significance probability p < 0.05,
      so, it represented that the 4-week chiropractic treatment had an effect on the
      weight distribution by means of left and right foot pressure distribution analysis.
      According to this result, we could know that 1 time treatment of chiropractic
      cervical vertebral correction and myofascial release doesn't have an effect
      statistically on the weight distribution examined by foot pressure measure. But, in
      the chiropractic cervical vertebral correction carried out for 4 weeks, there was a
      change in left and right sides. Therefore, we could know it has an effect on
      weight distribution by body balance when treated long time not 1 time.
      번역하기

      This study is to examine whether the chiropractic cervical vertebral correction has an effect on the posture and the balance, the main factors of weight distribution by adding stimulation to the nervous system through stimulation of proprioceptive ...

      This study is to examine whether the chiropractic cervical vertebral correction
      has an effect on the posture and the balance, the main factors of weight
      distribution by adding stimulation to the nervous system through stimulation of
      proprioceptive sense acceptor of chiropractic correction for scalar vestibuli,
      visuometer, somatesthesia, the main factors of posture control or not.
      This study has a purpose of examining whether the chiropractic correction of
      cervical vertebral has an effect on weight distribution through foot pressure
      measure, one of the evaluation methods of body balancing ability or not. The study
      procedures were carried out for the 40 subjects (male 20, female 19) from Suan
      remedial exercise cure center within Chinese medical clinic of Hanseo University,
      and from Hanseo University students, located in Seosan city, Chungcheongnam-do
      from Oct. 18 to Nov. 20, 2010. Of the selected 40 persons, 26 persons were in
      chiropractic treatment group, and 14 persons were in myofascial release treatment
      group, and among the chiropractic treatment group, 20 persons (male 10, female 10)
      received chiropractic treatment 3 times a week for 4 weeks to verify whether the
      chiropractic cervical vertebral correction has an effect to body balance or not.
      The result of study is as follows.
      As the result of measuring foot pressure of 1 time chiropractic treatement group,
      it changed from 42.13% before treatment to 43.99% after treatment at front foot
      pressure distribution, and from 57.66% to 55.76% at rear foot pressure distribution,
      from 50.40% to 50.68% at left foot pressure distribution, and from 49.63% to
      49.09% at right foot pressure distribution. So, it showed there was no change after
      1 time chiropractic treatment as it was bigger than significance probability p < 0.05.
      Comparing the average difference before and after the treatment, it showed no
      change after 1 time chiropractic treatment because it was bigger than significance
      probability p < 0.05 as front 1.86% increase, rear 1.9% decrease, left 0.28% crease,
      right 0.54% decrease.
      In the result of measuring the foot pressure of the 1 time myofascial release
      treatment group, it showed the change from 40.14% at front foot pressure
      distribution before treatment to 40.48% after treatment, from 60.03% to 59.53% at
      the rear foot pressure distribution, from 49.49% to 51.20% at the left foot pressure
      distribution, from 50.44% to 49.02% at the right foot pressure distribution.
      Comparing the average difference before and after the treatment, there was no
      change after 1 time myofascial release treatment because it was bigger than the change after 1 time myofascial release treatment because it was bigger than the
      significance probability p < 0.05 as front 0.34% increase, rear 0.5% decrease, left
      1.71% increase, and right 1.42% decrease.
      In the result of measuring the foot pressure of total 12 time chiropractic
      treatments group during 4 weeks, it was changed from 40.99% before treatment to
      45.96% after treatment at front foot pressure distribution, from 59.12% to 54.04% at
      rear foot pressure distribution, from 50.81% to 48.25% at left foot pressure
      distribution, and from 49.25% to 51.74% at right foot pressure distribution.
      Comparing the average difference before and after the treatment, it showed it
      didn't have any effect on the change after 4 week- chiropractic treatment because
      the change of front and rear foot pressure measurement was bigger than the
      significance probability p < 0.05 as front 4.97% increase, rear 5.8% decrease, left
      2.56% decrease, and right 2.49% increase, but, the change of right & left foot
      pressure measures was statistically smaller than significance probability p < 0.05,
      so, it represented that the 4-week chiropractic treatment had an effect on the
      weight distribution by means of left and right foot pressure distribution analysis.
      According to this result, we could know that 1 time treatment of chiropractic
      cervical vertebral correction and myofascial release doesn't have an effect
      statistically on the weight distribution examined by foot pressure measure. But, in
      the chiropractic cervical vertebral correction carried out for 4 weeks, there was a
      change in left and right sides. Therefore, we could know it has an effect on
      weight distribution by body balance when treated long time not 1 time.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구방법
      • 2.1 연구대상
      • 2.2 연구방법
      • 2.3 자료 분석 방법
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구방법
      • 2.1 연구대상
      • 2.2 연구방법
      • 2.3 자료 분석 방법
      • 3. 결과
      • 3.1 카이로프랙틱과 근막이완요법 1회 처치 집단의 변화
      • 3.2 카이로프랙틱 1회와 4주 처치 집단의 변화
      • 4. 논의
      • 5. 결론
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼