日帝下小作爭議에 關한 硏究 : 1920年代를 中心으로 Centerde Around 1920s = A Study About the Tenancy Dispute under Japanese Colonial Rule

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Tenancy Dispute was derived as a link of Japanese exploitation policy in Korea under Japanese Colonial Rule. As the farmer's social and economical conditions were unfavorable to the tenantry. Tenancy Dispute was spreaded out regionally and collectively. Especially, among Japanese agricultural exploitation policies, the most accurable thing was the high tenant rate and imputation of taxes to the tenantry and along this, tenancy dispute was explosed and intensified. It was the farmer's movement against hierachy, behavioural expression of subjectivity, and also the use of force against Japan, the characteristic of this movement was the farmer's resistance against Japanese exploitation policy. After World war I by the effect of the principle of the self determination of nations, it was natural that the movement turned into independence movement, against Japan in connection with the 1919 independence movement. Along the tenancy dispute, if the oppenent was a Korean landower, the dispute was solved without difficulties or the landower himself cut down the tenant rate. But if the oppenent were the Japanese landower or the farms, it was proved that the tenant's appeal couldn't be satisfied unless there was the change in Japanese colonism, basically judging from the case of Whanghae provincial dispute (Pyongbuk Bul-I Suseon Farm). In spite of that, as the dispute was aggravated Japan turned it strict policy into relieved one. It meant that, but for the Japanese basic change in the agricultural policy, it is apparant that Japan wouldn't choose the relieved policy without farmer's tenancy dispute. On that viewpoint, the tenancy dispute should be evaluated highly as the farmer's economical strife and also independence development against Japan. We should settle down the historical meaning of this movement in new dimension.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序 論
• Ⅱ. 小作爭議의 歷史的 背景
• Ⅲ. 小作爭議의 性格
• Ⅳ. 小作爭議의 實態 分析
• Ⅴ. 小作爭議의 影響
• Ⅵ. 結 論