RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      일반교육주도의 특수교육 찬반 쟁점과 시사점-학습장애를 중심으로- = Regular Education Initiative and the Implication in Korea -Focusing on Learning Disabilities-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103927547

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper focused on determined the reason that REI advocates REI criticized special education in the REI dispute and it examined how conservative special educators brought forth a counterargument. By that, the point that the Korean special education should make to reference was found out. The REI dispute was an unproductive dispute for the following reasons. First, both camps asked special education and general education for the cause of the problem, respectively, and were not able to find out a point of agreement for solving the problem. Second, it was a dispute produced in the special education community without participation from those in general education. In addition, it was found that key issues in REI debates were the classification of students with learning disabilities and support forms for them, which gives suggestions as to Korea's learning disability education as the following. First, active intervention needs to be planned and made from the school level for students with general learning difficulties, and through this process, an approach diagnosing learning disability students is required. Second, experts from diverse fields need to cooperate to provide appropriate guidance and methods to various types of learning disabilities. Third, diverse support systems and education services need to be provided in accordance with the level of learning disabilities.
      번역하기

      This paper focused on determined the reason that REI advocates REI criticized special education in the REI dispute and it examined how conservative special educators brought forth a counterargument. By that, the point that the Korean special education...

      This paper focused on determined the reason that REI advocates REI criticized special education in the REI dispute and it examined how conservative special educators brought forth a counterargument. By that, the point that the Korean special education should make to reference was found out. The REI dispute was an unproductive dispute for the following reasons. First, both camps asked special education and general education for the cause of the problem, respectively, and were not able to find out a point of agreement for solving the problem. Second, it was a dispute produced in the special education community without participation from those in general education. In addition, it was found that key issues in REI debates were the classification of students with learning disabilities and support forms for them, which gives suggestions as to Korea's learning disability education as the following. First, active intervention needs to be planned and made from the school level for students with general learning difficulties, and through this process, an approach diagnosing learning disability students is required. Second, experts from diverse fields need to cooperate to provide appropriate guidance and methods to various types of learning disabilities. Third, diverse support systems and education services need to be provided in accordance with the level of learning disabilities.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      본 논문에서는 일반교육주도(Regular Education Initiative: REI) 논쟁에서 REI 주장자들이 특수교육을 비판한 이유를 검토하고, 이에 대한 보수적인 특수교육 전문가들의 반론을 살펴본 후, REI 논쟁이 다음과 같은 두 가지 이유로 비생산적인 논쟁이었음을 밝혔다. 첫째, 양 진영이 각각 특수교육과 일반교육에서 문제의 원인을 찾아, 문제해결의 합의점에 도달하지 못했다. 둘째, 일반교육 측의 참여 없이 특수교육계를 중심으로 이루어진 논쟁이었다. 또한 REI 논쟁에서 중점적으로 다루어진 문제가 학습장애 학생의 분류와 지원형태에 관한 것이라는 점을 밝혔고, 이를 토대로 한국 학습장애교육에 대한 시사점을 다음과 같이 제시하였다. 첫째, 일단 일반적인 학습부진 학생에 대해서는 학교단위의 적극적인 교육적 중재가 계획실천되어야 하며, 이러한 과정을 통해서 학습장애 학생들을 진단하는 접근방법이 필요하다. 둘째, 다양한 전문가들이 협력하여 학습장애의 여러 유형에 적합한 지도내용과 방법을 구축해야 한다. 셋째, 학습장애의 정도에 맞는 다양한 수준의 지원 체제와 교육 서비스가 제공되어야 한다.
      번역하기

      본 논문에서는 일반교육주도(Regular Education Initiative: REI) 논쟁에서 REI 주장자들이 특수교육을 비판한 이유를 검토하고, 이에 대한 보수적인 특수교육 전문가들의 반론을 살펴본 후, REI 논쟁이...

      본 논문에서는 일반교육주도(Regular Education Initiative: REI) 논쟁에서 REI 주장자들이 특수교육을 비판한 이유를 검토하고, 이에 대한 보수적인 특수교육 전문가들의 반론을 살펴본 후, REI 논쟁이 다음과 같은 두 가지 이유로 비생산적인 논쟁이었음을 밝혔다. 첫째, 양 진영이 각각 특수교육과 일반교육에서 문제의 원인을 찾아, 문제해결의 합의점에 도달하지 못했다. 둘째, 일반교육 측의 참여 없이 특수교육계를 중심으로 이루어진 논쟁이었다. 또한 REI 논쟁에서 중점적으로 다루어진 문제가 학습장애 학생의 분류와 지원형태에 관한 것이라는 점을 밝혔고, 이를 토대로 한국 학습장애교육에 대한 시사점을 다음과 같이 제시하였다. 첫째, 일단 일반적인 학습부진 학생에 대해서는 학교단위의 적극적인 교육적 중재가 계획실천되어야 하며, 이러한 과정을 통해서 학습장애 학생들을 진단하는 접근방법이 필요하다. 둘째, 다양한 전문가들이 협력하여 학습장애의 여러 유형에 적합한 지도내용과 방법을 구축해야 한다. 셋째, 학습장애의 정도에 맞는 다양한 수준의 지원 체제와 교육 서비스가 제공되어야 한다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정대영, "학습장애의 개념과 분류에 대한 고찰" 2 (2): 1-29, 2005

      2 김동일, "학습장애 아동의 이해와 교육" 학지사 2003

      3 이소현, "특수아동교육" 학지사 2005

      4 국립특수교육원, "특수교육 요구아동 출현율 조사 연구" 2001

      5 정대영, "통합교육에서의 주요 쟁점과 실천과제 고찰" 한국특수아동학회 7 (7): 21-45, 2005

      6 홍정숙, "미국 통합교육의 역사-메인스트림과 일반교육주도 의 역사적 전개와 사회적 배경에 관한 고찰-" 한국특수아동학회 8 (8): 189-212, 2006

      7 清水貞夫, "軽度障害児への教育的対応をめぐるREI論争ー抽出指導批判からインクージョン 論争へー." 28 : 113-132, 1993

      8 メイヤー,C., "特別ニーズ教育への転換: 統合教育先進6カ国比較研究" 川島書店 1997

      9 茂木俊彦, "ノーマライゼーションと障害児教育" 全国障害者問題研究会出版部. 1996

      10 Wang, M. C., "Toward achieving educational excellence for all students: Program design and student outcomes" 8 (8): 25-34, 1987

      1 정대영, "학습장애의 개념과 분류에 대한 고찰" 2 (2): 1-29, 2005

      2 김동일, "학습장애 아동의 이해와 교육" 학지사 2003

      3 이소현, "특수아동교육" 학지사 2005

      4 국립특수교육원, "특수교육 요구아동 출현율 조사 연구" 2001

      5 정대영, "통합교육에서의 주요 쟁점과 실천과제 고찰" 한국특수아동학회 7 (7): 21-45, 2005

      6 홍정숙, "미국 통합교육의 역사-메인스트림과 일반교육주도 의 역사적 전개와 사회적 배경에 관한 고찰-" 한국특수아동학회 8 (8): 189-212, 2006

      7 清水貞夫, "軽度障害児への教育的対応をめぐるREI論争ー抽出指導批判からインクージョン 論争へー." 28 : 113-132, 1993

      8 メイヤー,C., "特別ニーズ教育への転換: 統合教育先進6カ国比較研究" 川島書店 1997

      9 茂木俊彦, "ノーマライゼーションと障害児教育" 全国障害者問題研究会出版部. 1996

      10 Wang, M. C., "Toward achieving educational excellence for all students: Program design and student outcomes" 8 (8): 25-34, 1987

      11 Gartner, A., "The yoke of special education: How to break It. Part of the federal role in education working paper series"

      12 MacMillan, D. L., "The social context of Dunn : Then and now" 27 (27): 466-480, 1994

      13 Lipsky, D. K., "The roles of parents, In Beyond separate education: Quality education for all" Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co 159-179, 1989

      14 Braaten, S. R., "The regular education initiative: Patent medicine for behavioral disorders" 55 (55): 21-27, 1988

      15 Lloyd, F. W., "The regular education initiative: Alternative perspective on concepts, issues, and models" Sycamore Publishing Company 1990

      16 Kauffman, J. M., "The regular education initiative as Regan-Bush education policy: A trickle-down theory of education of the hard-to-teach" 23 (23): 256-278, 1989

      17 McKinney, J. D., "The need for policy analysis in evaluating the regular education initiative" 21 (21): 12-18, 1988

      18 Kauffman, J. M., "The illusion of full inclusion: A comprehensive critique of a current special education bandwagon" PRO-ED, Inc 1995

      19 Calberg, C., "The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children : A meta-analysis" 14 (14): 295-309, 1980

      20 Goldstein, H., "The efficacy of special class training on the development of mentally retarded children" University of Illinois Press 1965

      21 Reynolds, M. C., "The Necessary Restructuring of Special and Regular Education" 53 (53): 391-398, 1987

      22 Budoff, M., "Special-class EMR children mainstreamed: A study of an aptitude(learning potential) x treatment interaction" 81 (81): 1-11, 1976

      23 Liberman, L. M., "Special education and regular education: A merger made in heaven?" 51 (51): 513-516, 1985

      24 Gartner, A., "School administration and financial arrangements, In Educating all students in the mainstreaming of regular education" Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co 105-120, 1989

      25 Wang, M. C., "Rethinking special education" 44 (44): 26-31, 1986

      26 Reynolds, M. C., "Restructuring"special school programs" : A Position Paper" 2 (2): 189-212, 1983

      27 Lipsky, D. K., "Restructuring for quality, In The regular education initiative: Alternative perspective on concepts, issues, and models" Sycamore Publishing Company 43-56, 1990

      28 Lloyd, J. W., "Reforming the relationship between regular and special education: Background and issues, In The regular education initiative: Alternative perspective on concepts, issues, and models" Sycamore Publishing Co 3-13, 1990

      29 Crowley, E. P., "Redefining the applied research agenda: Cooperative learning, prereferral, teacher consultation, and peer-mediated interventions" 21 (21): 43-52, 1988

      30 Hallahan, D., "Learning disabilities: Foundations, characteristics, and effective teaching" Allyn and Bacon 2005

      31 Stainback, S., "Integration versus cooperation: A commentary on "Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility"" 54 (54): 66-68, 1987

      32 Stainback, S., "Integration of students with severe handicaps into regular schools"

      33 Wang, M. C., "Integrating the children of the second system" 70 (70): 248-251, 1988

      34 Will, M.C., "Individualization: Is it possible in the regular classroom? Can we transfer what we've learned in special ed to regular ed?" 82 (82): 7-11, 1989

      35 Fuchs, D., "Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform" 60 (60): 294-309, 1994

      36 Keogh, B. K., "Improving services for problem learners: Rethinking and restructuring" 21 (21): 19-22, 1988

      37 Bryan, T., "Implications of the learning disabilities definition for the regular education initiative" 21 (21): 23-28, 1988

      38 Schumaker, J. B., "Implementing the regular education initiative in secondary schools: A different ball game" 21 (21): 36-42, 1988

      39 Fuchs, D., "Framing the REI debate: Abolitionists versus conservationists, In The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models" Sycamore Publishing Co 241-255, 1990

      40 Hallahan, D. P., "Examing the research base of the regular education initiative : Efficacy studies and the adaptive learning environments model" 21 (21): 29-55, 1988

      41 Will, M. C., "Educating students with learning problems and the changing role of the school psychologist" 17 (17): 476-478, 1988

      42 Will, M. C., "Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility, A Report to the Secretary" U.S. Department of Education 1986

      43 Will, M. C., "Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility" 52 (52): 411-415, 1986

      44 Lipsky, D. K., "Capable of achievement and worthy of respect: Education for handicapped students as if they were full-fledged human beings" 54 (54): 69-74, 1987

      45 Gartner, A., "Beyond separate education: Toward a quality system for all students" 57 (57): 367-395, 1987

      46 Lipsky, D. K., "Beyond separate education: Quality education for all" Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co 1989

      47 Skrtic, T. M., "Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization" Love Publishing Company 1991

      48 Kauffman, J. M., "Arguable assumptions underlying the regular education initiative" 21 (21): 6-11, 1988

      49 Kauffman, J. M., "An historical perspective: A personal perspective on our history of service to mildly handicapped and at-risk students" 10 (10): 12-14, 1989

      50 Kauffman, J. M., "A revolution can also mean returning to the starting point: Will school psychology help special education complete the circuit?" 17 (17): 490-494, 1988

      51 Reynolds, M. C., "A reaction to the JLD special series on the regular education initiative" 21 (21): 352-356, 1988

      52 Stainback, W., "A rationale for the merger of special and regular education" 51 (51): 102-111, 1984

      53 Lipsky, D. K., "A parental perspective on stress and coping" 55 (55): 614-617, 1985

      54 National Commission on Excellence in Education, "A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform" U. S. Department of Education 1983

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-07-06 학회명변경 영문명 : Kacsn: Korean Association Of The Child With Special Need -> Kacsn: Korean Association Of The Children With Special Need KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-06-14 학술지등록 한글명 : 특수아동교육연구
      외국어명 : The Journal of Special Children Education
      KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.22 1.22 1.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.11 1.15 1.374 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼