유노조기업 내 혁신적 작업조직과 근로자ㆍ노동조합의 보호

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 유노조기업 내에 혁신적 작업조직의 도입이 고용보장(고용안정협약, 고용보장정책, 고용조정률), 성과공유, 작업팀 재량권, 대의적 참여 등 근로자․노동조합의 보호장치에 어떤 영향을 주는지, 노동조합의 존재가 혁신적 작업조직과 근로자․노동조합 보호장치 사이에 조절작용을 하는지 등에 관해서 실증적 분석을 시도하였다. 사용 자료는 ｢사업체패널조사｣(2005-2011년 자료) 중 100인 이상 제조업 표본이고, 통계모형으로는 고정효과 패널로짓모형과 동태적 패널모형 등이 사용되었다. 분석 결과, 유노조기업 내에서 혁신적 작업조직의 도입이 고용보장정책(+), 이익․성과배분제(+) 등에 대해서 α=0.01 수준에서, 고용조정률(-), 작업팀 재량권(+) 등에 대해서 α=0.10 수준에서 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치고 있는 반면, 유노조기업에서 혁신적 작업조직의 도입은 고용보장협약이나 대의적 참여 등에 대해서 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치지 않고 있음이 확인되었다. 동시에 노동조합의 존재가 혁신적 작업조직이 고용보장정책, 이익․성과배분제, 고용조정률, 작업팀의 재량권 등에 미치는 영향을 통계적으로 유의하게 조절하지 못하고 있음도 발견되었다. 이상의 결과들은 혁신적 작업조직의 도입 시 고용보장 장치, 이익․성과배분제, 작업팀 재량권 증대, 노동조합의 경영참여 등 근로자․노동조합의 보호장치의 도입을 촉진하는 데 노동조합의 역할이 크지 않음을 시사한다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 실증결과들을 요약하고, 그 결과들의 배경과 함의들을 논의하였다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study empirically explores how much the adoption of innovative workplace practices within the unionized sector affects the protection of workers and labor union such as employment security clauses, gain-sharing, workers’ discretion and indirect participation, and also whether labor union acts as a moderator between the adoption of innovative workplace practices and the practices to protect workers and labor union. The samples of manufacturing establishments with equal to or more than 100 employees out of the four waves of Workplace Panel Survey data(2005-2011, biannually) are used and panel data analyses with fixed effects logit models and dynamic panel data models are employed as empirical models. The results of this study indicate that the adoption of innovative workplace practices in the unionized sector affects significantly employment security policy(+) at α=0.01, profit/gain sharing program(+) at α=0.01, redundancy rate(-) at α =0.10, and work-teams’ discretion(+) α=0.10, but that it does not significantly affect the contract of employment security clauses and indirect participation. The results also indicate that the existence of labor union do not moderate significantly the relations between the adoption of innovative workplace practices and the practices to protect workers and labor union. The results above imply that Korean labor unions do not play significant roles in facilitating protection of workers and labor union in the innovative workplace practices. Finally the results are summarized, and their implications are discussed.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
• Ⅱ. 이론적 논의와 연구모형
• Ⅲ. 자료와 기초통계
• Ⅳ. 실증분석 결과
• Ⅴ. 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 노용진, "일터혁신지수로 본 한국기업체 진단 평가" 노사발전재단 2011

2 김현동, "노동조합의 혁신활동 참여가 작업장 혁신에 미치는 영향: 업무개선제안활동 활성화를 중심으로" 한국노동연구원 11 (11): 135-166, 2011

3 최영희, "근로자들의 고용안정성에 대한 인식과 혁신활동 간의 관계: 조직정체성의 매개효과" 한국노동연구원 12 (12): 147-175, 2012

4 김동배, "근로자 참여가 노동조합에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향" 한국고용노사관계학회 19 (19): 1-26, 2009

5 島西 智輝, "高度經濟成長期に ぉける 日本生産性本部の 活動" (625) : 2012

6 Verma, A., "What Do Unions Do to the Workplace? Union Effects on Management and HRM Policies" 26 (26): 415-449, 2005

7 Ortiz, L., "Unions’ Responses to Teamwork : Differences at National and Workplace Levels" 5 (5): 49-69, 1999

8 Taylor, P., "Unions, Partnership and HRM : Sleeping with the Enemy?" 6 (6): 1151-1143, 1998

9 Delaney, J. T., "Unions, Human Resource Innovations, and Organizational Outcomes" 7 : 207-245, 1996

10 Liu, W., "Unions and the Adoption of High Performance Work Systems : Does Employment Security Play Role?" 63 (63): 109-127, 2009

11 Gill, C., "Union Presence, Employee Relations and High Performance Work Practices" 42 (42): 508-528, 2013

12 Barker, J. R., "Tightening the Iron Cage : Concertive Control in Self-managing Teams" 38 (38): 408-437, 1993

13 Kochan, T. A., "The Transformation of American Industrial Relations" Basic Books 1986

14 Upchurch, M., "The Realities of Partnership at Work" Palgrave McMillian 2008

15 Kochan, T. A., "The Mutual Gains Enterprise, Boston" 1994

16 Landsbergis, P., "The Impact of Lean Production and Related New Systems of Work Organization on Worker Health" 4 (4): 108-130, 1999

17 Fiorito, J., "The Impact of Human Resource Policies on Union Organizing" 26 (26): 113-126, 1987

18 Huselid, M. A., "The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance" 38 : 635-672, 1995

19 Ichniowski, C., "The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity : A Study Steel Finishing Lines" 87 : 291-313, 1997

20 Kochan T. A., "The Effects of Corporate Strategy and Workplace Innovations on Union Representation" 39 (39): 487-501, 1986

21 Kenzie, R., "The Effect of Trade Unions on High Performance Work systems(HPWS) : Does Industrial Relations Climate Matter?" 2015

22 Arellano, M., "Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data : Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations" 58 (58): 277-297, 1991

23 Eaton, A. E., "Productivity-enhancing Innovations in Work Organization, Compensation, and Employee Participation in the Union Versus the Non-Union Sectors" 6 : 63-109, 1994

24 Guest, D., "Partnership at Work : Mutuality and the Balance of Advantage" 39 (39): 207-236, 2001

25 TUC, "Partners for Progress" TUC 1996

26 Appelbaum, E., "Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay Off" ILR Press Cornell University 2000

27 Askenazy, P., "Innovative Work Practices, Information Technologies, and Working Conditions : Evidence for France" 544-565, 2010

28 Daemane, M. M. M., "Human Resource Management(HRM)and Trade Unions’Compatibility : ‘Soft-Hard’ Model Digestion for Human Capacity Building and Sustainable Productivity at Workplace" 5 (5): 121-130, 2014

29 Fiorito, J., "Human Resource Management Practices and Worker Desires for Union Representation" 22 (22): 335-354, 2001

30 MacDuffie, J. P., "Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance : Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry" 48 : 197-221, 1995

31 Bryson, A., "High-Involvement Management Practices, Trade Union Representation and Workplace Performance in Britain" 52 (52): 451-491, 2005

32 Bae, K., "High Performance Work Practices and Employee Voice : A Comparison of Japanese and Korean Workers" 50 (50): 1-29, 2011

33 Frost, A. C., "Explaining Variation in Workplace Restructuring : The Role of Local Union Capabilities" 53 (53): 559-578, 2000

34 Ramsay, H., "Employees and High-performance Work Systems" 39 (39): 501-532, 2000

35 Allen, R. E., "Employee Involvement Programs : The Non-involvement of Unions Revisited" 17 (17): 479-495, 1996

36 Verma, A., "Employee Involvement : The Implications of Non-involvement by Unions" 40 (40): 556-568, 1987

37 Pfeffer, J., "Competitive Advantage through People: Unleashing the Power of the Work Force" Harvard Business School Press 1994

38 Ackers, P., "British Trade Unions and Social Partnership : Rhetoric, Reality and Strategy" 529-550, 1998

39 Pohler, D. M., "Balancing Efficiency, Equity, and Voice : The Impact of Unions and High-Involvement Work Practices on Work Outcomes" 67 (67): 1063-1094, 2014

40 Lucio, M. M., "Assessing Partnership : The Prospects for, and Challenges of Modernization" 24 (24): 252-261, 2002

41 Wells, D., "Are Strong Unions Compatible with the New Model of Human Resource Management?" 48 (48): 56-585, 1993

42 Godard, J., "A Critical Assessment of the High-Performing Paradigm" 42 (42): 349-378, 2004