RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지속가능한 어촌마을 개발을 위한 중요 요소 분석 = Analysis of Important Factors for Sustainable Fishing Village Development

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106610499

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is aimed at the deduction of the important priority factors by setting the comprehensive rate in each of the economy, sociability and environmental areas for the sustainable development of fishing villages. As the research methods, review of domestic and overseas literature and Delphi questionnaire survey on experts, and hierarchical structure analysis were executed. Accordingly, this study is aimed at providing the basic data at the time of establishing plans by assessing the level of importance and priorities for each item through the deduction of the elements necessary for the fishing village plan. Key results of the study are as follows. First, as the results of review of domestic and overseas literature related to sustainability indices of fishing villages, a total of 50 items in the areas of economy, sociability and environment were deduced. Second, validity for each area was confirmed through Delphi questionnaire survey on experts. Third, as the results of factor analysis conducted on the basis of the hierarchical structure analysis for detailed items for each sector, 3 factors in the economic area, 2 factors in the social area and 3 factors in environment area were deduced. Fourth, as the results of the relative importance of the higher tiers, economic sector (0.528) displayed results that are more than 2 times higher than the social (0.261) and environmental (0.212) sectors. Establishment of foundation for independent competition (0.105), balanced development of small fishing village (0.086) and population engaged in economic activities in comparison to the fishing village population (0.077) were analyzed as the most important detailed items. Based on these results, experts pointed out that the economic sector is most important for the sustainable development of fishing village and, in detail, priority must be placed on the balanced development on the basis if the extent of independence of the fishing villages, and emphasized activation of residents engaged in economic activities in fishing villages in order to support them. That is, in order to increase the level of independence of the fishing villages, it was determined that there is a dire needs for expansion of diversified specialized businesses and infrastructural facilities through agreement by the residents capable of economic activities, and means of activating fishing villages through securing of budget at the local autonomous government level to provide support for the residents.
    번역하기

    This study is aimed at the deduction of the important priority factors by setting the comprehensive rate in each of the economy, sociability and environmental areas for the sustainable development of fishing villages. As the research methods, review o...

    This study is aimed at the deduction of the important priority factors by setting the comprehensive rate in each of the economy, sociability and environmental areas for the sustainable development of fishing villages. As the research methods, review of domestic and overseas literature and Delphi questionnaire survey on experts, and hierarchical structure analysis were executed. Accordingly, this study is aimed at providing the basic data at the time of establishing plans by assessing the level of importance and priorities for each item through the deduction of the elements necessary for the fishing village plan. Key results of the study are as follows. First, as the results of review of domestic and overseas literature related to sustainability indices of fishing villages, a total of 50 items in the areas of economy, sociability and environment were deduced. Second, validity for each area was confirmed through Delphi questionnaire survey on experts. Third, as the results of factor analysis conducted on the basis of the hierarchical structure analysis for detailed items for each sector, 3 factors in the economic area, 2 factors in the social area and 3 factors in environment area were deduced. Fourth, as the results of the relative importance of the higher tiers, economic sector (0.528) displayed results that are more than 2 times higher than the social (0.261) and environmental (0.212) sectors. Establishment of foundation for independent competition (0.105), balanced development of small fishing village (0.086) and population engaged in economic activities in comparison to the fishing village population (0.077) were analyzed as the most important detailed items. Based on these results, experts pointed out that the economic sector is most important for the sustainable development of fishing village and, in detail, priority must be placed on the balanced development on the basis if the extent of independence of the fishing villages, and emphasized activation of residents engaged in economic activities in fishing villages in order to support them. That is, in order to increase the level of independence of the fishing villages, it was determined that there is a dire needs for expansion of diversified specialized businesses and infrastructural facilities through agreement by the residents capable of economic activities, and means of activating fishing villages through securing of budget at the local autonomous government level to provide support for the residents.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 곽행구, "해양자원의 생태관광 프로그램 개발:전남 갯벌 및 어촌체험마을 중심으로" 한국관광연구학회 22 (22): 227-243, 2008

    2 안영길, "커뮤니티 공간 개념 도입을 통한 관광어촌 활성화 계획 : 변산 대항리를 사례로" 서울시립대학교 대학원 2006

    3 이진희, "제주도 어촌관광 동기분석에 따른 관광활성화 방안에 관한 연구" 한국농촌계획학회 17 (17): 43-53, 2011

    4 박종호, "읍면소재지 섬지역의 인구변화" 한국농촌계획학회 19 (19): 11-21, 2013

    5 박용진, "읍ㆍ면급 섬지역 서비스산업의 구조적 분화" 한국농촌계획학회 19 (19): 1-10, 2013

    6 한상학, "울릉도 너도밤나무림의 미세지형별 생태적 특성" 한국환경생태학회 33 (33): 686-694, 2019

    7 김소담, "완도지역 붉가시나무의 성장 및 결실 특성과 종실량 상대성장식" 한국환경생태학회 33 (33): 440-446, 2019

    8 이광옥, "어촌체험마을 활성화를 위한 장애요인도출에 관한 연구: 어촌체험마을 운영자의 FGI를 이용하여" 한국관광연구학회 29 (29): 209-220, 2015

    9 김종화, "어촌체험마을 방문객 유형화에 관한 연구 - 충남 태안군 어촌체험마을을 중심으로 -" 한국농촌계획학회 20 (20): 45-53, 2014

    10 김정태, "어촌지역의 농어촌서비스기준 실태와 이행실적 점검방식의 개선방안" 한국농촌계획학회 18 (18): 91-101, 2012

    1 곽행구, "해양자원의 생태관광 프로그램 개발:전남 갯벌 및 어촌체험마을 중심으로" 한국관광연구학회 22 (22): 227-243, 2008

    2 안영길, "커뮤니티 공간 개념 도입을 통한 관광어촌 활성화 계획 : 변산 대항리를 사례로" 서울시립대학교 대학원 2006

    3 이진희, "제주도 어촌관광 동기분석에 따른 관광활성화 방안에 관한 연구" 한국농촌계획학회 17 (17): 43-53, 2011

    4 박종호, "읍면소재지 섬지역의 인구변화" 한국농촌계획학회 19 (19): 11-21, 2013

    5 박용진, "읍ㆍ면급 섬지역 서비스산업의 구조적 분화" 한국농촌계획학회 19 (19): 1-10, 2013

    6 한상학, "울릉도 너도밤나무림의 미세지형별 생태적 특성" 한국환경생태학회 33 (33): 686-694, 2019

    7 김소담, "완도지역 붉가시나무의 성장 및 결실 특성과 종실량 상대성장식" 한국환경생태학회 33 (33): 440-446, 2019

    8 이광옥, "어촌체험마을 활성화를 위한 장애요인도출에 관한 연구: 어촌체험마을 운영자의 FGI를 이용하여" 한국관광연구학회 29 (29): 209-220, 2015

    9 김종화, "어촌체험마을 방문객 유형화에 관한 연구 - 충남 태안군 어촌체험마을을 중심으로 -" 한국농촌계획학회 20 (20): 45-53, 2014

    10 김정태, "어촌지역의 농어촌서비스기준 실태와 이행실적 점검방식의 개선방안" 한국농촌계획학회 18 (18): 91-101, 2012

    11 박혜은, "어촌마을 주민참여 교육 프로그램 효과성 분석에 관한 연구-지역애착도와 공동체의식 향상을 중심으로-" 한국농촌계획학회 19 (19): 137-147, 2013

    12 안계복, "어메니티자원 분석을 통한 어촌마을의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구" 한국농촌계획학회 16 (16): 147-156, 2010

    13 이승주, "어메니티자원 분석을 통한 비안도 어촌 마을 특화계획" 한국농촌계획학회 19 (19): 209-220, 2013

    14 김동찬, "생태체험관광 활성화를 위한 어촌체험마을의 선택속성 연구- 전문가 및 선감어촌체험마을 체험객을 대상으로 -" 한국조경학회 41 (41): 29-42, 2013

    15 김대식, "부산시 어촌·어항개발에 대한 의식 분석" 한국수산해양교육학회 17 (17): 218-227, 2005

    16 박성현, "도서종합개발계획의 회복력에 대한 탐색적 고찰" 한국지방행정학회 15 (15): 129-150, 2018

    17 강현경, "남해군 어촌지역 무인도 생태현황 기초연구" 한국농촌계획학회 15 (15): 81-96, 2009

    18 임영규, "국내 어촌관광 실태에 따른 개발방향의 탐색적 연구" 한국관광연구학회 18 (18): 309-322, 2004

    19 이광규, "거제도 천장산 일대 상록활엽수림의 식물군집구조 특성" 한국환경생태학회 33 (33): 708-721, 2019

    20 "https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/sustainabledevelopment-indicators-sdis"

    21 "https://sdg.data.gov/"

    22 "https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/sdi/indicators"

    23 Park, S. W., "The direction of the fish village new deal 300 Project" Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Balanced Development Research Center 2019

    24 Saaty, T. L., "The analytic hierarchy process" 1990

    25 Yoo, S. D., "The analysis on the relationships about tourist’s activities, motivation pre, expectation post, satisfaction intention to revisit : Focused on the tourists visiting to the beach villages in Kangwon Province" 10 : 123-139, 1999

    26 Kim, S. G, "Sustainable fishing village tourism development" 174 : 1-7, 1999

    27 Ministry of Environment, "Sustainable development committee, 2018 Sustainability report" 2018

    28 Choi, S. A., "Strategies by fishing village type to increase fishing income" Korea Maritime Institute 2009

    29 Song, J. J., "Statistical analysis method of SPSS/AMOS for the preparation of a thesis" 21st Century Publishing House 2008

    30 Korea Fisheries Association, "Population extinction crisis and countermeasures of fishing villages" 2019

    31 United Nations, "Indicators of sustainable development:Guidelines and methodologies" United Nations 2007

    32 United Nations, "Indicators of sustainable development:Guidelines and methodologies" United Nations 2006

    33 Park. J. K., "Feasibility study for the 3rd 10th year(’08~’17) of comprehensive island development plan" Korea Research Institute for Local Administration 2014

    34 OECD, "Environmental indicators –Towards sustainable development–"

    35 Kim, Y. P., "A study on urban type fishing port development model considering functional optimization" Pukyong National University 2006

    36 Kim, S. G, "A study on the evaluation of the main fishing village" 234 : 79-91, 2004

    37 Kim, S. G., "A study on the development of fishing village tourism types" Korea Maritime Institute 2001

    38 Ahn, Y. W., "A study on structural improvement and comprehensive development of Chuja-do fishing village" 9 (9): 57-70, 1997

    39 Choi, S. A., "A study of an appeasement scheme for bipolarization in fishing communities" Korea Maritime Institute 2007

    40 Choi, J. U, "A study for physical and locational characteristics of Dangsan forest in rural and coastal villages" 36 (36): 131-133, 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-07-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning KCI등재후보
    2006-06-19 학술지등록 한글명 : 농촌계획
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.57 0.55 0.727 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼