RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      공공주택사업에 있어서 중앙정부와 지방정부간 기능배분에 관한 연구 - 국가공기업(구 대한주택공사)과 지방자치단체간 역할모형에 대한 설문조사를 중심으로 - = A Study on the Functional Allocation between Central and Local Governments in Public Housing Projects - Focusing on a Survey on Role Models between National Public Enterprises (formerly Korea Housing Corporation) and Local Governments.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103988203

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aims to explore the role playing model in public housing projects between the central government and local governments from public interest point of view in Korea. This study also focuses on setting up the situation of the times to meet the public housing demand by coordinating the role of the ex-KNHC(the Korea National Housing Corporation) on behalf of Korean central government and that of local governments for coping with localization or decentralization. This study reviews the contents and trends of decentralization in Korea, and examines the functions or effects of public housing policy as one of the national policies in the context of changing process of the relationship between the central government and local governments. Finally, this study analyzed the role of the national enterprise(ex-KNHC) on behalf of the central government and local governments in public housing policy, and suggests some policy implications for the future. This study is approached on the base of questionnaire survey for the public personnels of local governments and the employees of the national enterprise, and also on the base of brain storming method for the specialists in the field of housing policy. The result can be summarized as followings; The public personnels of local governments show strong support for decentralization policy of public housing policy, whereas the employees of the national enterprise(ex-KNHC) are seemed to be skeptical. The shortage of specialists and low quality of public housing policy tools in local governments has been proved to be the main obstacle to decentralizing the powers or authorities of public housing policy from the central government to local governments. The main reason to promote decentralization of the powers or authorities of public housing policy is drawn as improving housing quality in local market, and satisfying the flexibility of local land and housing market. In addition, so many responses expect that local governments can promote citizen's participation and private sector's investment in public housing more efficiently than the central government. This study suggests the desirable role playing model between the central government and local governments in the field of public housing for localization trends in the future.
      번역하기

      This study aims to explore the role playing model in public housing projects between the central government and local governments from public interest point of view in Korea. This study also focuses on setting up the situation of the times to meet the...

      This study aims to explore the role playing model in public housing projects between the central government and local governments from public interest point of view in Korea. This study also focuses on setting up the situation of the times to meet the public housing demand by coordinating the role of the ex-KNHC(the Korea National Housing Corporation) on behalf of Korean central government and that of local governments for coping with localization or decentralization. This study reviews the contents and trends of decentralization in Korea, and examines the functions or effects of public housing policy as one of the national policies in the context of changing process of the relationship between the central government and local governments. Finally, this study analyzed the role of the national enterprise(ex-KNHC) on behalf of the central government and local governments in public housing policy, and suggests some policy implications for the future. This study is approached on the base of questionnaire survey for the public personnels of local governments and the employees of the national enterprise, and also on the base of brain storming method for the specialists in the field of housing policy. The result can be summarized as followings; The public personnels of local governments show strong support for decentralization policy of public housing policy, whereas the employees of the national enterprise(ex-KNHC) are seemed to be skeptical. The shortage of specialists and low quality of public housing policy tools in local governments has been proved to be the main obstacle to decentralizing the powers or authorities of public housing policy from the central government to local governments. The main reason to promote decentralization of the powers or authorities of public housing policy is drawn as improving housing quality in local market, and satisfying the flexibility of local land and housing market. In addition, so many responses expect that local governments can promote citizen's participation and private sector's investment in public housing more efficiently than the central government. This study suggests the desirable role playing model between the central government and local governments in the field of public housing for localization trends in the future.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 소진광, "특별지방행정기관과 지방자치단체간의 관계" 337-360, 2003

      2 하혜수, "지방정부의 자치권 확대방안연구" 경기개발연구원 2000

      3 소진광, "지방자치와 지역발전" 박영사 2005

      4 김종성, "지방자치법상 지방자치단체에 대한 국가감독제도의 개선방안" 한국행정연구소 42 (42): 27-52, 2004

      5 송광태, "지방의원 의정비의 향후 결정방향에 관한 연구" 창원대학교 사회과학연구소 1-20, 2007

      6 이병훈, "지방분권의 이념과 현실- 중앙과 지방의 권한과 기능 및 책임의 배분을 중심으로" 한국공법학회 33 (33): 103-124, 2004

      7 하정봉, "중앙행정권한 지방이양사무의 특성에 관한 연구. in: 이명박 정부의 행정선진화 방안" 2008

      8 지방분권촉진위원회, "제1기 지방분권촉진위원회 지방분권 백서" 2010

      9 김병준, "정부간 관계의 이론, In 정부간 관계, In 정세욱교수 화갑기념논문집" 법문사 1997

      10 장영희, "정부간 관계. in: 정세욱교수 화갑기념논문집" 법문사 1997

      1 소진광, "특별지방행정기관과 지방자치단체간의 관계" 337-360, 2003

      2 하혜수, "지방정부의 자치권 확대방안연구" 경기개발연구원 2000

      3 소진광, "지방자치와 지역발전" 박영사 2005

      4 김종성, "지방자치법상 지방자치단체에 대한 국가감독제도의 개선방안" 한국행정연구소 42 (42): 27-52, 2004

      5 송광태, "지방의원 의정비의 향후 결정방향에 관한 연구" 창원대학교 사회과학연구소 1-20, 2007

      6 이병훈, "지방분권의 이념과 현실- 중앙과 지방의 권한과 기능 및 책임의 배분을 중심으로" 한국공법학회 33 (33): 103-124, 2004

      7 하정봉, "중앙행정권한 지방이양사무의 특성에 관한 연구. in: 이명박 정부의 행정선진화 방안" 2008

      8 지방분권촉진위원회, "제1기 지방분권촉진위원회 지방분권 백서" 2010

      9 김병준, "정부간 관계의 이론, In 정부간 관계, In 정세욱교수 화갑기념논문집" 법문사 1997

      10 장영희, "정부간 관계. in: 정세욱교수 화갑기념논문집" 법문사 1997

      11 소진광, "작은 정부를 지향하는 국가공기업 구조조정 방향" 2008

      12 대한국토도시계획학회, "도시계획론" 보성각 2008

      13 박종화, "도시경영론" 박영사 2003

      14 하혜수, "국가경쟁력과 중앙-지방관계 : 중앙통제방식의 전환" 경기개발연구원 2 : 1997

      15 松村岐夫, "地方自治. in: 現代政治學叢書 15" 東京大學出版會 1984

      16 Wright, D., "Understanding Intergovernmental Relations" Brooks/Cole Publishing Company 1988

      17 ICMA, "The Municipal Year Book" International City/County Management Association 2006

      18 Zimmerman, J. F., "State-Local Relations : A Partnership Approach" Praeger Publisher 1995

      19 Wildavsky,Aaron, "Speaking Truth to the Power : The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis" Little Brown 1979

      20 Kingdom,J, "Local Government and Politics" Simon and Schuster 1991

      21 Bennett, R. J, "Decentralization, Local Government, and Markets" Clarendon Press 1990

      22 Rhodes, R. A. W., "Control and Power in Central-Local Government Relations" Gower Publishing Co. Ltd 1983

      23 Dunsire, Andrew, "Central Control over Local Authorities : A Cybernetic Approach" 59 : 1981

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.89 0.89 0.84
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.84 0.87 1.024 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼