This study sociologically examines how ‘poetry’ is consumed in Korean films, using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital as an analytical framework. The subjects are Lee Chang-dong’s Poetry (2010) and Lee Joon-ik’s Dongju (2016) and Byeonsan...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110287834
박준형 (경상북도교육청)
2026
Korean
Poetry ; cultural capital ; habitus ; Bourdieu ; Korean cinema ; symbolic power ; distinction ; 시(詩) ; 문화자본 ; 아비투스 ; 부르디외 ; 한국영화 ; 상징 권력 ; 구별 짓기
KCI등재
학술저널
105-133(29쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study sociologically examines how ‘poetry’ is consumed in Korean films, using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital as an analytical framework. The subjects are Lee Chang-dong’s Poetry (2010) and Lee Joon-ik’s Dongju (2016) and Byeonsan...
This study sociologically examines how ‘poetry’ is consumed in Korean films, using Bourdieu’s theory of cultural capital as an analytical framework. The subjects are Lee Chang-dong’s Poetry (2010) and Lee Joon-ik’s Dongju (2016) and Byeonsan (2018), cross-analyzed to typify patterns of poetry consumption.
In Poetry, poetry originates from the lower class’s ‘cultural goodwill,’ transforms into an ethical practice responding to victims’ suffering, and functions as a language resisting dominant symbolic power. In Dongju, poetry is sanctified as national symbolic capital forming national identity within a colonial context. In Byeonsan, embodied cultural capital is converted into hip-hop, exhibiting a pattern of capital conversion reappropriated as a language of self-affirmation.
Common to all three films is that poetry is completed only when one confronts the suffering of others, one’s own shame, and wretched origins head-on. While this reiterates Bourdieu’s logic of class reproduction, it simultaneously entails the potential for symbolic subversion that cracks the existing social structure. This study identifies that poetry consumption in Korean films extends beyond mere upward social mobility into ethical, national, and self-affirming practices, and critically examines the explanatory power and limitations of Bourdieu’s theory.
재형상화의 연쇄: 리쾨르의 삼중 모방론으로 읽는 울프-커닝햄-돌드리
병렬구속 세계의 K-시네마: 2004-2025 한국영화 지형에서 본 2020년대의 징후들
<레이디 두아>, 부유화 경제의 비판적 표상: 볼탕스키와 에스케르의 가치화 형태론을 중심으로