RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      평판형 수압파쇄 균열을 통과하는 다공질유동 특성에 관한 DNS 해석 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102651212

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The flow analyses through a porous hydraulic fractures is among the most important tasks in recently developed shale reservoirs but is rendered difficult by non-Darcy effects and geometric changes in the hydraulic fractures during production. In this study, several Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) models of hydraulic fractures, with a simple shape such as that of parallel plates, filled with proppants were built. Direct Numerical Simulation(DNS) analyses were then carried out to examine the flow loss characteristics of the fractures. The hydraulic diameters for the simulation models were calculated using the DNS results, and then they were compared with the results from Kozeny’s definition of hydraulic diameter which is most widely used in the flow analysis field. Also, the characteristic parameters based on both hydraulic diameters were estimated for the investigation of the flow loss variation features. Consequently, it was checked in this study that the hydraulic diameter based on Kozeny’s definition is not accordant to the results from the DNS analyses, and the case using the CFD results exhibits f·Re robustness like general pipe flows, whereas the other case using Kozeny’s definition doesn’t. Ultimately, it is expected that discoveries reported in this study would help further porous flow analyses such as hydraulic fracture flows.
      번역하기

      The flow analyses through a porous hydraulic fractures is among the most important tasks in recently developed shale reservoirs but is rendered difficult by non-Darcy effects and geometric changes in the hydraulic fractures during production. In this ...

      The flow analyses through a porous hydraulic fractures is among the most important tasks in recently developed shale reservoirs but is rendered difficult by non-Darcy effects and geometric changes in the hydraulic fractures during production. In this study, several Computational Fluid Dynamics(CFD) models of hydraulic fractures, with a simple shape such as that of parallel plates, filled with proppants were built. Direct Numerical Simulation(DNS) analyses were then carried out to examine the flow loss characteristics of the fractures. The hydraulic diameters for the simulation models were calculated using the DNS results, and then they were compared with the results from Kozeny’s definition of hydraulic diameter which is most widely used in the flow analysis field. Also, the characteristic parameters based on both hydraulic diameters were estimated for the investigation of the flow loss variation features. Consequently, it was checked in this study that the hydraulic diameter based on Kozeny’s definition is not accordant to the results from the DNS analyses, and the case using the CFD results exhibits f·Re robustness like general pipe flows, whereas the other case using Kozeny’s definition doesn’t. Ultimately, it is expected that discoveries reported in this study would help further porous flow analyses such as hydraulic fracture flows.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kozeny, J., "Ueber kapillare leitung des wassers im boden" (136) : 271-306, 1927

      2 Carman, P.C., "The determination of the specific surface of powders" 57 (57): 225-234, 1938

      3 Nelson, P.H., "Permeability-porosity relationships in sedi-mentary rocks" 35 (35): 38-62, 1994

      4 Cipolla, C.L., "Hydraulic fracture monitoring to reservoir simulation: maximizing value"

      5 White, F.M., "Fluid dynamics" McGraw-Hill 325-404, 2001

      6 Bear, J., "Dynamics of fluids in porous media" American Elservier Pub. Inc. 27-194, 1975

      7 Shin, C.H., "A DNS simulation study for examining the tortuosity effects on the definition of hydraulic diameter and friction factor of a porous medium" 37-38, 2016

      1 Kozeny, J., "Ueber kapillare leitung des wassers im boden" (136) : 271-306, 1927

      2 Carman, P.C., "The determination of the specific surface of powders" 57 (57): 225-234, 1938

      3 Nelson, P.H., "Permeability-porosity relationships in sedi-mentary rocks" 35 (35): 38-62, 1994

      4 Cipolla, C.L., "Hydraulic fracture monitoring to reservoir simulation: maximizing value"

      5 White, F.M., "Fluid dynamics" McGraw-Hill 325-404, 2001

      6 Bear, J., "Dynamics of fluids in porous media" American Elservier Pub. Inc. 27-194, 1975

      7 Shin, C.H., "A DNS simulation study for examining the tortuosity effects on the definition of hydraulic diameter and friction factor of a porous medium" 37-38, 2016

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-06-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Jpurnal of Computatuonal Fluids Engineering -> Korean Society of Computatuonal Fluids Engineering KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.2 0.2 0.19
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.16 0.15 0.405 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼