RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개정신탁법 시행에 따른 신탁과세구조의 개선방안 = Enforcement of Amendment of the Trust Act and the Improvements Plans of the Trust Taxation Structure

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104296422

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Newly revised trust law took effect on July, 26, 2012. The intent of the law is to reflect the variance of economic situation, give it better treatment in accord with global standard, and is to establish a foothold of a legal basis to invigorate the trust system. That is to say, the trust attract great attention rather than current existing financial system under the circumstances of entering aging society. In this situation, trust taxation system should be revised completely. To do this, it had to be examined listed below. Through this, legal stability of trust system should be enhanced and minimize tax avoidance.
    First, since current trust taxation only applies conduit theory, it is not enough to resolve the issues such as deferred payment of tax through the grantor. Thus, trust operation method should be switched over from center of grantor to center of trustee by introducing entity theory to current trust taxation. Trust should be considered as a taxpayer to do this mentioned above.
    Second, to improve this profit and loss distribution standard should be set up depending on whole amount of trusted assets. Through this, profit and loss distribution standard should depends on establish rate by case by case on trust contract. The loss rate should be considered depends upon earning rate if earning rate is different to loss rate taxation to beneficiary on trust.
    Third, the trust duration should be set its limit. Since there is no restriction on revised trust law,the tax avoidance possibility still exists through the trust system. To minimize this, trust duration has to be restricted in efficiency of economical aspect.
    Forth, there should be a maneuver to future interest of settlor's power of beneficiary appointment in living trusts for the purpose of succession(article 59) and successive interests(article 60) which introduced on revised trust law. Since this interest may crash with the idea of ownership on current civil law, solution on civil law should be seek first. There will be unnecessary tax friction because tax basis of future interest can not be cleared without this solution.
    Fifth, it is to be switched over from taxation of per gift action to taxation of period measures on gift tax deduction method which is on Article 13, section 1 and article 53 on inheritance tax and gift tax law. The current regulation is not strong enough to respond strongly against trust because period creation of trust system is much longer than any other else.
    Through this, revising trust law will be expected to contributed to invigorate trust system.
    번역하기

    Newly revised trust law took effect on July, 26, 2012. The intent of the law is to reflect the variance of economic situation, give it better treatment in accord with global standard, and is to establish a foothold of a legal basis to invigorate the t...

    Newly revised trust law took effect on July, 26, 2012. The intent of the law is to reflect the variance of economic situation, give it better treatment in accord with global standard, and is to establish a foothold of a legal basis to invigorate the trust system. That is to say, the trust attract great attention rather than current existing financial system under the circumstances of entering aging society. In this situation, trust taxation system should be revised completely. To do this, it had to be examined listed below. Through this, legal stability of trust system should be enhanced and minimize tax avoidance.
    First, since current trust taxation only applies conduit theory, it is not enough to resolve the issues such as deferred payment of tax through the grantor. Thus, trust operation method should be switched over from center of grantor to center of trustee by introducing entity theory to current trust taxation. Trust should be considered as a taxpayer to do this mentioned above.
    Second, to improve this profit and loss distribution standard should be set up depending on whole amount of trusted assets. Through this, profit and loss distribution standard should depends on establish rate by case by case on trust contract. The loss rate should be considered depends upon earning rate if earning rate is different to loss rate taxation to beneficiary on trust.
    Third, the trust duration should be set its limit. Since there is no restriction on revised trust law,the tax avoidance possibility still exists through the trust system. To minimize this, trust duration has to be restricted in efficiency of economical aspect.
    Forth, there should be a maneuver to future interest of settlor's power of beneficiary appointment in living trusts for the purpose of succession(article 59) and successive interests(article 60) which introduced on revised trust law. Since this interest may crash with the idea of ownership on current civil law, solution on civil law should be seek first. There will be unnecessary tax friction because tax basis of future interest can not be cleared without this solution.
    Fifth, it is to be switched over from taxation of per gift action to taxation of period measures on gift tax deduction method which is on Article 13, section 1 and article 53 on inheritance tax and gift tax law. The current regulation is not strong enough to respond strongly against trust because period creation of trust system is much longer than any other else.
    Through this, revising trust law will be expected to contributed to invigorate trust system.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이연갑, "「신탁법」상 수탁자의 의무와 권한" 법무부 (48) : 30-52, 2009

    2 김진, "자산이전과세의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구원 2009

    3 최수정, "일본 신신탁법" 진원사 2007

    4 이상윤, "영미법" 박영사 2000

    5 홍용식, "신탁소득과세에 관한 연구" 12 (12): 149-178, 1999

    6 이중교, "신탁법상의 신탁에 관한 과세상 논점" 법조협회 58 (58): 318-359, 2009

    7 김병일, "신탁법상 수익자과세에 관한 연구" 한국세무학회 13 (13): 357-386, 2012

    8 김병일, "신탁법 개정에 따른 신탁세제 개편 방향에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구포럼 10 (10): 303-350, 2010

    9 최동식, "신탁법" 법문사 2008

    10 김재진, "신탁과세제도의 합리화 방안" 한국조세연구원 1998

    1 이연갑, "「신탁법」상 수탁자의 의무와 권한" 법무부 (48) : 30-52, 2009

    2 김진, "자산이전과세의 개선방안에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구원 2009

    3 최수정, "일본 신신탁법" 진원사 2007

    4 이상윤, "영미법" 박영사 2000

    5 홍용식, "신탁소득과세에 관한 연구" 12 (12): 149-178, 1999

    6 이중교, "신탁법상의 신탁에 관한 과세상 논점" 법조협회 58 (58): 318-359, 2009

    7 김병일, "신탁법상 수익자과세에 관한 연구" 한국세무학회 13 (13): 357-386, 2012

    8 김병일, "신탁법 개정에 따른 신탁세제 개편 방향에 관한 연구" 한국조세연구포럼 10 (10): 303-350, 2010

    9 최동식, "신탁법" 법문사 2008

    10 김재진, "신탁과세제도의 합리화 방안" 한국조세연구원 1998

    11 최현태, "신탁과 법인의 역사" 세창출판사 2007

    12 이창희, "세법강의" 박영사 2008

    13 김종해, "생전신탁과세에 관한 연구―상속세및증여세법을 중심으로―" 한국세법학회 18 (18): 44-77, 2012

    14 김병일, "미국의 신탁과세제도와 그 시사점" 한국조세연구포럼 10 (10): 332-377, 2010

    15 서철원, "미국 비즈니스 법" 법원사 2000

    16 임채웅, "遺言信託 및 遺言代用信託의 硏究" 대한변호사협회 (397) : 124-143, 2009

    17 奧村眞吾, "詳解 信託法の活用と稅務" 請文社 2008

    18 최현태, "福祉型信託 導入을 통한 民事信託의 活性化 - 受益者連續信託을 中心으로 -" 한국재산법학회 27 (27): 1-26, 2010

    19 안성포, "信託의 基本構造와 그 法理" 중앙법학회 9 (9): 709-732, 2007

    20 新井誠, "信託法(第2版)" 有斐閣 2002

    21 四宮和夫, "信託法" 有斐閣 1989

    22 William M, "Trusts and Estates Including Taxation and Future Interests Fourth Edition" WEST 2010

    23 John H. Langbein, "The Uniform Prudent Investor Act and the Future of Trust Investing, Faculty Schorship Series"

    24 John Chipman Gray, "The Rule Against Perpetuities § 201 4th ed"

    25 J E Penner, "The Law of Trusts 6th edition" Oxford University Press 2008

    26 Jacqueline, A., "The Income Taxation Of Trusts & Estates"

    27 Tadao Okamura, "Taxation and Trusts in the United States and Japan" 2009

    28 Kenneth E, Anderson, "Prentice Hall's Federal Taxtation 2008" Prentice Hall 2008

    29 Peter Melcher, "Maximizing The Benifits Of Estate Planning Bet-to-Die Strategies:Clats and Private Annuities"

    30 Jesse Dukeminier, "A Modern Guide to Perpetuities" 74 : 1986

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.23 1.23 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.29 1.2 2.08 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼