RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Disunited Elites and Unconsolidated Democracy in Turkey

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82585881

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Despite half a century of multiparty politics, Turkey has showed a continuing elusiveness of democratic consolidation. This study argues that the failure of elite transformations and the absence of elite unity is the most determining explanatory variable to understand the unconsolidated democracy in Turkey. Some works correctly point out the importance of an elite settlement and convergence in the democratic transitions and breakdowns in Turkey instead of a hazy concept of low political institutionalization. Yet, this study still finds their seemingly elaborated elite-centered analysis wanting since they fail to provide crucial and comprehensive notions of elite theory in which democratization can best be understood by studying basic continuities and changes in the internal relations of national elites. Following the lead of Higley and Burton, this paper here intends to offer a more adequate explanation of the elite variable in the unstable regimes of Turkey and to contend that the elusiveness of consolidation is due to continuing elite disunity. The rationale is that unless regime changes are preceded or accompanied by elite transformations from disunity to consensual unity, they should be regarded as strictly temporary. Considering that elite transformations are highly contingent and procedural affairs, this study focuses on specific circumstances that have failed to trigger an elite settlement or convergence at several points of crisis in Turkey compared to the other successful cases.
    번역하기

    Despite half a century of multiparty politics, Turkey has showed a continuing elusiveness of democratic consolidation. This study argues that the failure of elite transformations and the absence of elite unity is the most determining explanatory varia...

    Despite half a century of multiparty politics, Turkey has showed a continuing elusiveness of democratic consolidation. This study argues that the failure of elite transformations and the absence of elite unity is the most determining explanatory variable to understand the unconsolidated democracy in Turkey. Some works correctly point out the importance of an elite settlement and convergence in the democratic transitions and breakdowns in Turkey instead of a hazy concept of low political institutionalization. Yet, this study still finds their seemingly elaborated elite-centered analysis wanting since they fail to provide crucial and comprehensive notions of elite theory in which democratization can best be understood by studying basic continuities and changes in the internal relations of national elites. Following the lead of Higley and Burton, this paper here intends to offer a more adequate explanation of the elite variable in the unstable regimes of Turkey and to contend that the elusiveness of consolidation is due to continuing elite disunity. The rationale is that unless regime changes are preceded or accompanied by elite transformations from disunity to consensual unity, they should be regarded as strictly temporary. Considering that elite transformations are highly contingent and procedural affairs, this study focuses on specific circumstances that have failed to trigger an elite settlement or convergence at several points of crisis in Turkey compared to the other successful cases.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 〈Abstract〉
    • Ⅰ. Introduction
    • Ⅱ. Theoretical Approaches to the Role of Agents in Democratic Transitions
    • Ⅲ. Protracted Unconsolidation and Missing Agents in Turkish Democracy
    • Ⅳ. The Failure of Elite Transformations and Unconsolidated Democracy in Turkey
    • 〈Abstract〉
    • Ⅰ. Introduction
    • Ⅱ. Theoretical Approaches to the Role of Agents in Democratic Transitions
    • Ⅲ. Protracted Unconsolidation and Missing Agents in Turkish Democracy
    • Ⅳ. The Failure of Elite Transformations and Unconsolidated Democracy in Turkey
    • Ⅴ. Conclusion
    • References
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Diamond,Larry, "wToward Democratic Consolidation. In: The Global Resurgence of Democracy" he Johns Hopkins University Press 1996

    2 Rustow,Dankwart, "tTransitions to Democracy" 2 (2): 1970

    3 Angrist,Michele Penner, "tParty Systems and Regime Formation in the Modern Middle East: Explaining Turkish Exceptionalism" 36 (36): 2004

    4 Diamond, Larry, "tIntroduction. In: Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy" Lynne Rienner Publishers 1995

    5 Burton, Michael, "iIntroduction: Elite Transformations and Democratic Regimes. In: Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe" Cambridge University Press 1992

    6 Schmitter, Philippe C, "What Democracy Is…And Is Not. In: The Global Resurgence of Democracy" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1996

    7 Keyman, Fuat, "Turkish Politics in a Changing World" Istanbul Bilgi University Press 2007

    8 Mainwaring,Scott, "Transitions to Democracy and Democratic Consolidation: Theoretical and Comparative Issues. In: In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspectives" University of Notre Dame Press 1992

    9 O’Donnell, Guillermo, "Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1986

    10 Diamond,Larry, "The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World" Times Books 2008

    1 Diamond,Larry, "wToward Democratic Consolidation. In: The Global Resurgence of Democracy" he Johns Hopkins University Press 1996

    2 Rustow,Dankwart, "tTransitions to Democracy" 2 (2): 1970

    3 Angrist,Michele Penner, "tParty Systems and Regime Formation in the Modern Middle East: Explaining Turkish Exceptionalism" 36 (36): 2004

    4 Diamond, Larry, "tIntroduction. In: Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy" Lynne Rienner Publishers 1995

    5 Burton, Michael, "iIntroduction: Elite Transformations and Democratic Regimes. In: Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe" Cambridge University Press 1992

    6 Schmitter, Philippe C, "What Democracy Is…And Is Not. In: The Global Resurgence of Democracy" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1996

    7 Keyman, Fuat, "Turkish Politics in a Changing World" Istanbul Bilgi University Press 2007

    8 Mainwaring,Scott, "Transitions to Democracy and Democratic Consolidation: Theoretical and Comparative Issues. In: In Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspectives" University of Notre Dame Press 1992

    9 O’Donnell, Guillermo, "Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1986

    10 Diamond,Larry, "The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World" Times Books 2008

    11 Higley, John, "The Elite Variable in Democratic Transitions and Breakdowns" 54 (54): 1989

    12 Linz, Juan, "The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1978

    13 Heper,Metin, "Strong State as a Problem for the Consolidation of Democracy: Turkey and Germany Compared" 25 (25): 1992

    14 Linz, Juan, "Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1996

    15 Dahl,Robert A, "Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition" Yale University Press 1971

    16 Burton, Michael, "Political Crises and Elite Settlements. In: Elite, Crises, and the Origins of Regimes" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 1998

    17 O’Donnell,Guillermore, "Illusions about Consolidation. In: Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1997

    18 Henry, Clement M, "Globalization and the Politics of Development in the Middle East" Cambridge University Press 2010

    19 Freedom House, "Freedom in the World" Freedom House 2010

    20 Dogan, Mattei, "Elites, Crises, and Regimes in Comparative Analysis. In: Elite, Crises, and the Origins of Regimes" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 1998

    21 Burton, Michael, "Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe: An Overview. In: In Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe" Cambridge University Press 1992

    22 Higley, John, "Elite Settlements in Taiwan" 9 (9): 1998

    23 Higley, John, "Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy" Rowman & Littlefield 2006

    24 Diamond,Larry, "Developing Democracy" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1999

    25 Ozbudun, Ergun, "Democratization and the Politics of Constitution Making in Turkey" Central European University Press 2009

    26 Sunar, Ilkay, "Democracy in Turkey: Problems and Prospects. In: Transition from Authoritarian Rule: Southern Europe" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1986

    27 O’Donnell, Guillermore, "Delegative Democracy. In: In The Global Resurgence of Democracy" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1996

    28 Ozbudun,Ergun, "Contemporary Turkish Politics: Challenges to Democratic Consolidation" Lynne Rienner Publishers 2000

    29 Onis,Ziya, "Conservative Globalists versus Defensive Nationalists: Political Parties and Paradoxes of Europeanization in Turkey. In: Turkey on the Road to European Union Membership: National Identity and Political Change" Routledge 2008

    30 Schmitter,Philippe C, "Civil Society East and West. In: Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies" The Johns Hopkins University Press 1997

    31 Mardin,Serif, "Center-Periphery Relations: A Key to Turkish Politics? In: Political Participation in Turkey" Bogazici University Press 1975

    32 Field, Lowell, "A New Elite Framework for Political Sociology" 28 (28): 1990

    33 Schmitter,Philippe C, "(The Consolidation of Democracy and Representation of Social Groups" 35 (35): 1992

    34 Kalaycioglu,Ersin, "(Elections and Party Preferences in Turkey" 27 (27): 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-10-27 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Association Of The Middle East Studies -> Korean Association Of Middle East Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-06-16 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국중동학회 논총
    외국어명 : Korean Journal of the Middle East Studies
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.36 0.33 0.716 0.05
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼