RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    漢韓對擧式合成方位詞的句法與語義分析 ― 以“前後”和“앞뒤”爲中心 = A Study on Chinese and Korean Antisense Directional Compound Words

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109895465

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article takes the antonym directional compound words “前後” and “앞뒤” in Chinese and Korean as the research objects, and conducts a survey and analysis based on practical corpus from the perspectives of syntax and semantics. Although both languages have such compounding words formed by antonyms, there are certain differences in their syntactic and semantic distributions. The characteristics exhibited by the semantic types and distributions of the two words in our corpus correspond to the syntactic distribution characteristics of the two words we investigated. In our corpus statistics, we found that the Chinese word “前後” often depends on nouns or verbs before or after it in the sentence to express its meaning, and there are relatively few cases where it can act as the subject or object of the sentence alone. This syntactic dependency reflects the close semantic relationship between the two words. That is to say, when Chinese users perceive the “前後” in the reverse conceptual space, they are accustomed to relying on reference objects and highlighting the space divided by the reference objects. Therefore, “前後” can express both “conjunctive quantity” and “disjunctive quantity” in both the spatial and temporal domains. In contrast, the Korean word “앞뒤” appears more frequently in the positions of subject and object, which contrasts with the syntactic characteristics of Chinese “前後”. This indicates that Korean “앞뒤” is more independent and referential than Chinese “before and after”, and Korean native speakers tend to perceive a continuous overall range without highlighting the reference object when they perceive “앞뒤”. Therefore, when extended to the temporal and abstract domains, they tend to express the “covering conjunctive meaning” and “fusing conjunctive meaning” of a continuous overall range.
    번역하기

    This article takes the antonym directional compound words “前後” and “앞뒤” in Chinese and Korean as the research objects, and conducts a survey and analysis based on practical corpus from the perspectives of syntax and semantics. Although...

    This article takes the antonym directional compound words “前後” and “앞뒤” in Chinese and Korean as the research objects, and conducts a survey and analysis based on practical corpus from the perspectives of syntax and semantics. Although both languages have such compounding words formed by antonyms, there are certain differences in their syntactic and semantic distributions. The characteristics exhibited by the semantic types and distributions of the two words in our corpus correspond to the syntactic distribution characteristics of the two words we investigated. In our corpus statistics, we found that the Chinese word “前後” often depends on nouns or verbs before or after it in the sentence to express its meaning, and there are relatively few cases where it can act as the subject or object of the sentence alone. This syntactic dependency reflects the close semantic relationship between the two words. That is to say, when Chinese users perceive the “前後” in the reverse conceptual space, they are accustomed to relying on reference objects and highlighting the space divided by the reference objects. Therefore, “前後” can express both “conjunctive quantity” and “disjunctive quantity” in both the spatial and temporal domains. In contrast, the Korean word “앞뒤” appears more frequently in the positions of subject and object, which contrasts with the syntactic characteristics of Chinese “前後”. This indicates that Korean “앞뒤” is more independent and referential than Chinese “before and after”, and Korean native speakers tend to perceive a continuous overall range without highlighting the reference object when they perceive “앞뒤”. Therefore, when extended to the temporal and abstract domains, they tend to express the “covering conjunctive meaning” and “fusing conjunctive meaning” of a continuous overall range.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼