Scientific research and development in colleges and universities: expenditures and manpower, 1953-54

목차 (Table of Contents)

• CONTENTS
• Summary = 7
• PartⅠ. Introduction = 15
• Section 1. Background = 15
• Section 2. General methodology = 17
• A. Scope of survey = 17
• B. Method of inquiry = 18
• C. Validity of data = 18
• D. Classification = 18
• (1) Fields of science = 18
• (2) Types of schools = 18
• (3) Size of institutions = 19
• (4) Types of control = 19
• PartⅡ. Costs of research and development in colleges and universities, fiscal year 1954 = 21
• Section 1. Scope and method = 21
• A. Organizational approach = 21
• (1) Colleges and universities proper = 21
• (2) Agricultural experiment stations = 22
• (3) Research centers = 22
• B. Character of work and fields of science = 22
• Section 2. Total costs of research and development in colleges add universities = 24
• A. Total costs of research and development = 24
• B. Total costs of research and development in colleges and universities proper and in agricultural experiment stations = 24
• (1) Costs of research and development by character of work and by field of science = 24
• (2) Sources of support = 24
• Section 3. Costs of research and development in colleges and universities proper = 26
• A. Total costs of research and development in colleges and universities proper = 26
• (1) Costs by source of support = 26
• (2) Costs by field of science and by source of support = 26
• (3) Total costs by character of work, field of science, and source of support = 27
• (4) Costs by size of institution = 29
• B. Separately budgeted expenditures for research and development in colleges and universities = 29
• (1) Total expenditures for separately budgeted research and development = 29
• (2) Expenditures for separately budgeted research and development by source of support and by field of science = 30
• (3) Expenditures for separately budgeted research and development by character of work and by field of science = 31
• (4) Expenditures for separately budgeted research and development by department and by source of support = 32
• (5) Distribution of expenditures by institutions = 33
• (6) Private and public institutions = 33
• (7) Size of institutions = 33
• (8) Federal support of separately budgeted research and development in colleges and universities proper = 34
• (9) Other sources of support for separately budgeted research and development in colleges and universities proper = 38
• C. University contributions to indirect costs of separately budgeted research and development = 38
• (1) Federally sponsored research and development = 41
• (2) Research and development sponsored by other sources = 43
• D. Departmental research = 43
• (1) Volume of departmental research = 44
• (2) Departmental research as contribution to direct costs of federally sponsored research = 44
• E. Medical schools = 45
• (1) Total funds for research and development = 45
• (2) Separately budgeted research and development = 46
• (3) Medical-school support of indirect costs = 48
• (4) Departmental research = 48
• F. Schools of engineering = 48
• (1) Total funds for research and development = 49
• (2) Separately budgeted research and development = 49
• (3) Engineering-school support of indirect costs of research = 51
• (4) Departmental research = 51
• Section 4. Total costs of research and development in agricultural experiment stations = 53
• A. Regional support of research and development = 53
• B. Expenditures by source of support = 53
• (1) Federal Government = 53
• (2) Other sources of support = 54
• C. Expenditures by character of work and by field of science = 54
• (1) Character of work = 54
• (2) Fields of science = 54
• D. Distribution of expenditures by stations = 55
• Section 5. Total costs of research and development in Federal research centers = 56
• PartⅢ. Professional scientific personnel in colleges and universities, academic year 1953-54 = 59
• Section 1. Scope and method = 59
• A. Scope = 59
• B. Method = 59
• (1) Definition of employment = 59
• (2) Basis of computations = 60
• (3) Time period = 60
• (4) Classification of scientific personnel = 61
• Section 2. Total science faculty employed and faculty engaged in research and development = 62
• A. Total science faculty employed = 62
• (1) Total science faculty employed by field of science = 62
• (2) Total faculty engaged in research and development by field of science = 62
• B. Total science faculty employed and faculty engaged in research and development by private and public institutions = 63
• C. Total science faculty employed and faculty engaged in research and development by type of school = 64
• Section 3. Science faculty in 180 colleges and universities proper = 66
• A. Science faculty employed by academic rank = 66
• B. Faculty engaged in research and development by academic rank = 66
• C. Science faculty employed compared with faculty engaged in research and development = 66
• D. Science faculty employed and faculty engaged in research and development by field of science = 67
• E. Science faculty employed and faculty engaged in research and development by size of institution = 68
• F. Science faculty employed and faculty engaged in research and development by public and private institutions = 68
• G. Science faculty employed and faculty engaged in research and development by type of school = 69
• H. Supporting research personnel = 70
• (1) Supporting research personnel by field of science = 71
• (2) Supporting research personnel by type of school = 71
• Section 4. Science faculty in 807 colleges and universities proper = 72
• A. Science faculty employed = 72
• (1) Full-time science faculty employed by academic rank = 72
• B. Faculty engaged in research and development = 72
• C. Science faculty employed and faculty engaged in research and development by field of science = 72
• D. Science faculty employed end faculty engaged in research and development by private and public institutions = 73
• E. Science faculty employed and faculty engaged in research and development by type of school = 73
• Section 5. Agricultural experiment stations and schools of agriculture = 74
• A. Professional scientific personnel by field of science = 74
• B. Professional scientific personnel by size of institution = 74
• Part Ⅳ. Relationships of expenditures and personnel data = 75
• Section 1. Comparison of expenditures for separately budgeted research and development with faculty engaged in research and development = 75
• A. Colleges and universities proper = 75
• (1) Comparison by field of science = 76
• (2) Comparison by size of institution = 76
• B. Medical schools = 77
• C. Engineering schools = 78
• Section 2. Comparison of expenditures for separately budgeted research and development with science faculty employed = 79
• A. Colleges and universities proper = 79
• B. Medical schools = 79
• C. Engineering schools = 80
• Section 3. Relationship of medical and engineering schools to parent institutions = 81
• A. Medical schools = 81
• (1) Funds = 81
• (2) Faculty = 81
• B. Engineering schools = 81
• (1) Funds = 81
• (2) Faculty = 82
• Section 4. Relationship of agricultural experiment stations to parent institutions = 83
• A. Funds = 83
• B. Faculty = 83
• Appendix A. Statistical tables = 85
• Appendix B. Scientific professional personnel in special research organizations = 113
• Appendix C. Forms used in survey = 119