실무적 관점에서의 경죄 신속처리절차 개선에 대한 소고 = Consideration for Speedy Procedure of Misdemeanor

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

According to article 27(3) of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, every citizen shall have the right to a speedy trial and, most of all, a criminal defendant shall have the right to a public trial ‘without delay. Regarding that this article makes it clear as basic human rights not as just a legal principle, the nub of the matter is ‘stabilizing a precarious position of the suspect or the defendant.’
After rejection of the bill relating to speedy procedure in 2006, the promulgation of the electronic summary procedure in 2010 was expected to the efficiency and productivity of criminal procedure remarkably. However, this system is not really welcomed now because of some issues raised in the electronic summary procedure, because it does not save much time from preliminary investigation of police to sending a case to the public prosecutor's office and it is hard to expand investigations on the case, and so forth. Hence, after examining examples from other countries relevant to speedy procedure of misdemeanor, it is demanded a new model of speedy procedure functioning.
It is necessary for enhanced efficiency to amend current speedy procedures by various means such as conceptualization of misdemeanor, simplified documentation and transmission, the prosecution in simplified forms and procedures, the examination of evidence and easing of hearsay evidence, simplified decision from the procedural point of view. It is proper that we expand the jurisdiction of Si court or Gun court(hereinafter referred to as ‘Si/Gun court’) and improve the law for immediate processing by utilizing Si/Gun courts.
It is also needed to ensure efficiency by suspension execution and to keep a balance by restricting the appeal caused by the mistake in determining relevant facts.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 안경옥, "형사절차상 '신속'가능성과 법치주의적 한계" 한국비교형사법학회 8 (8): 269-290, 2006

2 이재상, "형사소송법" 박영사 2015

3 정웅석, "형사사법정보시스템의 운영현황 및 활용방안" 법조협회 62 (62): 5-45, 2013

4 김종구, "형사사법개혁론" 법문사 2004

5 정철호, "형벌의 개별화에 대한 한계" 한국형사정책학회 15 (15): 6-255, 2003

6 박성민, "프랑스의 신속한 사건처리절차와 시사점 - 프랑스의 유죄인정제도를 중심으로 -" 대검찰청 (37) : 191-237, 2012

7 사법정책연구원, "정식재판청구제도 개선 방안에 관한 연구" 사법정책연구원 2016

8 한윤경, "전자약식의 평가와 향후 방향" 법조협회 60 (60): 5-76, 2011

9 전상현, "외국인의 기본권— 헌법재판소 결정례에 대한 비판적 검토를 중심으로 —" 비교법학연구소 43 : 579-611, 2014

10 송광섭, "약식명령절차에서의 몇 가지 논쟁, 그 이용 현황과 개선방안" 대검찰청 (40) : 176-226, 2013

11 김재봉, "신속처리절차의 개선방안" 한국형사법학회 (24) : 257-280, 2005

12 대법원, "사법연감" 2015

13 한영수, "사개추위의 경죄사건의 신속처리절차 도입방안에 대한 검토" 한국비교형사법학회 8 (8): 407-436, 2006

14 손동권, "경죄처벌절차의 최근 입법동향에 관한 고찰" 한국공안행정학회 (22) : 15-40, 2006

15 정영덕, "경죄사건의 신속처리를 위한 검사직무대리제도의 개선방안" 안암법학회 (36) : 269-306, 2011

16 김택수, "경죄사건에 대한 합리적 신속처리절차 도입방안- 프랑스와의 비교법적 고찰을 중심으로-" 한국형사정책학회 28 (28): 155-184, 2016

17 윤지영, "경미사건 처리절차에 관한 비교법적 고찰" 한국비교형사법학회 12 (12): 377-409, 2010

18 "www.justice.gouv.fr"

19 "www.courts.go.jp/about/sosiki/kakyusaibansyo/index.html#kanni"

20 "www.americanbar.org"

21 Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Federal Justice Statistics, 2013-2014"

22 Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Federal Jusitce Statistics, 2012-Statistical Tables"

23 Ministry of Justice, "Criminal Justice statistics : March 2017"

24 신동운, "2006년 형사소송법 개정안에 대한 검토의견" 한국형사정책학회 18 (18): 325-348, 2006