RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      성경에 있어서의 담보

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102086421

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      민법상 채권 내지 계약을 담보하는 데에는 물적 담보, 인적 담보, 손해담보계약 등이 있다. 성경에서도 여러 가지 경우에 채권을 담보하는 내용이 존재하고 있는데, 현행민법상의 물적담보와 인적 담보와 손해담보계약에 해당한다고 볼 수 있는 사례가 여러 곳에서 발견된다. 성경에서의 담보는 현행민법과 어떠한 경우는 유사한 반면 어떠한 경우는 그 내용이 다르다. 본 논문은 이러한 점들을 사례별로 고찰하여 현행민법의 시각에서 관련된 부분의 성경을 해석함으로써 법학적인 차원에서의 성경해석의 길을 열어 신학적으로 성경을 해석하는 범위를 확대할 수 있도록 할 뿐만 아니라 민법 형성기에 영향을 미친 성경구절의 해석을 통해 민법해석의 새로운 길을 모색하고자 한다.
      번역하기

      민법상 채권 내지 계약을 담보하는 데에는 물적 담보, 인적 담보, 손해담보계약 등이 있다. 성경에서도 여러 가지 경우에 채권을 담보하는 내용이 존재하고 있는데, 현행민법상의 물적담보...

      민법상 채권 내지 계약을 담보하는 데에는 물적 담보, 인적 담보, 손해담보계약 등이 있다. 성경에서도 여러 가지 경우에 채권을 담보하는 내용이 존재하고 있는데, 현행민법상의 물적담보와 인적 담보와 손해담보계약에 해당한다고 볼 수 있는 사례가 여러 곳에서 발견된다. 성경에서의 담보는 현행민법과 어떠한 경우는 유사한 반면 어떠한 경우는 그 내용이 다르다. 본 논문은 이러한 점들을 사례별로 고찰하여 현행민법의 시각에서 관련된 부분의 성경을 해석함으로써 법학적인 차원에서의 성경해석의 길을 열어 신학적으로 성경을 해석하는 범위를 확대할 수 있도록 할 뿐만 아니라 민법 형성기에 영향을 미친 성경구절의 해석을 통해 민법해석의 새로운 길을 모색하고자 한다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      There is physical security and personal security in the security system under Civil law. The former is to guarantee the debt of a debtor or a third party owns certain things, personal security is to guarantee the bonds to third party property, in addition to the usual general property of the debtor. The status of creditors in the physical security is safe because of preferential payment right to other creditors of secured party, but physical security has the disadvantage that the procedure is complicated and that those who do not have the object of physical collateral can not use. But personal security has the advantage of this spread the risk of liability payable by the increase in property total inability to be, since it has the disadvantage still uncertain that the feasibility of the bond depends on the state of the debtor and third parties general property. In addition to these there are damage collateral agreements under which one party for the purpose of this reparation to the detriment of the future arise from certain requirements with respect to the other. There is a section on mortgage bonds in many cases exist in the Bible, in the case can be seen as the personal and physical collateral damage and the contract of the current Civil law is found in many places.
      This article aims to study to find out what is the same and the differences between in the Bible and the present Civil Law concerning the security system. In the Bible there are several kinds of security. Israelites established the right of pledge in many cases, which A pledgee of movables is entitled to hold possession of the movables which he has received from the debtor or a third person as security for his claim, and to obtain satisfaction of his claim out of the movables in preference to other creditors. This is very similar to Civil law. But in the Bible clock of widow could not be the object of pledge, Civil law regulates “A thing which cannot be assigned shall not be the object of pledge”. And Bible says “If you take your neighbors cloak as a pledge, return it to him by sunset”, but according to Civil law there is no need for pledgee to return the object of pledge to debtor until he obtains satisfaction of his claim. Bible protects destitute orphans and widows, Civil law does not deal especially with them. A surety is liable to perform the obligation upon which the principal obligor has defaulted. On this Two have the same meaning. So Bible says “Do not be a man who strikes hands in pledge or puts up security for debts”, but Civil law has not such a regulation. And Bible says “Ensure your servants well-being; let not the arrogant oppress me”. Damage security contract in mordern times plays the same role.
      번역하기

      There is physical security and personal security in the security system under Civil law. The former is to guarantee the debt of a debtor or a third party owns certain things, personal security is to guarantee the bonds to third party property, in addi...

      There is physical security and personal security in the security system under Civil law. The former is to guarantee the debt of a debtor or a third party owns certain things, personal security is to guarantee the bonds to third party property, in addition to the usual general property of the debtor. The status of creditors in the physical security is safe because of preferential payment right to other creditors of secured party, but physical security has the disadvantage that the procedure is complicated and that those who do not have the object of physical collateral can not use. But personal security has the advantage of this spread the risk of liability payable by the increase in property total inability to be, since it has the disadvantage still uncertain that the feasibility of the bond depends on the state of the debtor and third parties general property. In addition to these there are damage collateral agreements under which one party for the purpose of this reparation to the detriment of the future arise from certain requirements with respect to the other. There is a section on mortgage bonds in many cases exist in the Bible, in the case can be seen as the personal and physical collateral damage and the contract of the current Civil law is found in many places.
      This article aims to study to find out what is the same and the differences between in the Bible and the present Civil Law concerning the security system. In the Bible there are several kinds of security. Israelites established the right of pledge in many cases, which A pledgee of movables is entitled to hold possession of the movables which he has received from the debtor or a third person as security for his claim, and to obtain satisfaction of his claim out of the movables in preference to other creditors. This is very similar to Civil law. But in the Bible clock of widow could not be the object of pledge, Civil law regulates “A thing which cannot be assigned shall not be the object of pledge”. And Bible says “If you take your neighbors cloak as a pledge, return it to him by sunset”, but according to Civil law there is no need for pledgee to return the object of pledge to debtor until he obtains satisfaction of his claim. Bible protects destitute orphans and widows, Civil law does not deal especially with them. A surety is liable to perform the obligation upon which the principal obligor has defaulted. On this Two have the same meaning. So Bible says “Do not be a man who strikes hands in pledge or puts up security for debts”, but Civil law has not such a regulation. And Bible says “Ensure your servants well-being; let not the arrogant oppress me”. Damage security contract in mordern times plays the same role.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 국문요약
      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 물적담보
      • Ⅲ. 인적담보
      • Ⅳ. 기타담보
      • 국문요약
      • Ⅰ. 들어가며
      • Ⅱ. 물적담보
      • Ⅲ. 인적담보
      • Ⅳ. 기타담보
      • Ⅴ. 맺으며
      • 참고문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이영준, "한국민법론, 물권편" 박영사 2004

      2 곽윤직, "채권총론" 박영사 1994

      3 장재옥, "징벌적 손해배상 개념의 수용가능성" 법학연구원 39 (39): 81-115, 2015

      4 김형배, "민법학강의(제15판)" 신조사 2016

      5 김준호, "민법강의" 법문사 2016

      6 지원림, "민법강의" 홍문사 2016

      7 곽윤직, "물권법" 박영사 2002

      1 이영준, "한국민법론, 물권편" 박영사 2004

      2 곽윤직, "채권총론" 박영사 1994

      3 장재옥, "징벌적 손해배상 개념의 수용가능성" 법학연구원 39 (39): 81-115, 2015

      4 김형배, "민법학강의(제15판)" 신조사 2016

      5 김준호, "민법강의" 법문사 2016

      6 지원림, "민법강의" 홍문사 2016

      7 곽윤직, "물권법" 박영사 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-09-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Law Review -> Law Review KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-07-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Law Review -> Korean Law Review KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 法學硏究 -> 법학연구 KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.02 1.02 1.05
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.07 1.02 1.083 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼