The aim of this study is to make experimental testing of which art education method is more efficient to develop creativity through art working of six year old children.
In order to meet this aim, one subject is chosen, which is to show the differe...
The aim of this study is to make experimental testing of which art education method is more efficient to develop creativity through art working of six year old children.
In order to meet this aim, one subject is chosen, which is to show the difference between The Open Art Education Method being payed much attention recently by many educators and The Unit Art Education Method being actually used by many educators.
Will there be any significant difference between The Open Art Education Method and The Unit Art Education Method for the developing creativity of early children?
(1) Will there be any significant difference in the measured creativity?
(fluency, adaptability, originality, imagination)
(2) Will there be any significant difference in the domain creativity?
(linguistic creativity, diagrammatic creativity, bodily creativity)
The results of this research is that in general the experimental group led by The Open Art Education Method has more efficient educational effect than the comparison group led by The Unit Art Education Method in developing creative power. The under elements when it is divided into the measured creativity and domain creativity is;
(1) Measured Creativity
It shows that the group led by The Open Art Education Method has the more efficient educational effect than the group led by The Unit Art Education Method.
The under elements, when it comes to the measured creativity, snows that in the fluency and originality, the group led by The Open Art Education Method has the more efficient educational effect than the group led by The Unit Art Education Method, but in the adaptability and the imagination, there is no significant difference.
(2) Domain Creativity
It shows that the group led by The Open Art Education Method has the more efficient educational effect than the group led by The Unit Art Education Method in the creativity. The under elements, when it comes to the domain creativity, shows that in the diagrammatic creativity the group led by The Open Art Education Method has the more efficient educational effect than the group led by The Unit Art Education Method, but in the linguistic, bodily creativity, there is no significant difference.