RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      Mapping the robotic hysterectomy learning curve and re-establishing surgical training metrics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107776112

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objective: Common robotic training curricula in the US entail completion of an online module followed by lab training with standardized exercises, such as manipulating needles with robotic needle drivers. Assessments are generally limited to elapsed t...

      Objective: Common robotic training curricula in the US entail completion of an online module followed by lab training with standardized exercises, such as manipulating needles with robotic needle drivers. Assessments are generally limited to elapsed time and subjective proficiency. We sought to test the feasibility of a simulation-based robotic hysterectomy curriculum to collect objective measurements of trainee progress, map the trainee learning curve and provide a system for trainee-specific evaluation.
      Methods: An observational cohort study of a single institutions' residency members participating in a procedural hysterectomy simulation performed every 4 months. Each simulation episode had one-on-one teaching. The robotic platform was used to measure all movements within cartesian coordinates, the number of clutches, instrument collisions, time to complete the simulated hysterectomy, and unintended injuries during the procedure. Results: Voluntary participation was high. Objective metrics were successfully recorded at each session and improved nearly universally. More senior residents demonstrated superior capabilities compared to junior residents as expected. The majority of residents (29/31) were able to complete an entire simulated hysterectomy in the allotted 30-minute training session period by the end of the year.
      Conclusions: This program establishes learning curves based on objective data points using a risk-free simulation platform. The curves can then be used to evaluate trainee skill level and tailor teaching to specific objective competencies. The pilot curriculum can be tailored to the unique needs of each surgical discipline's residency training.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Liss MA, "Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer™ and the daVinci surgical skills simulator™ using the Mimic™ software for urologic robotic surgical education" 26 : 1629-1634, 2012

      2 Vaughan MH, "Validation of the simulated vaginal hysterectomy trainer" 25 : 1101-1106, 2018

      3 Miyazaki D, "Validation of an educational simulation model for vaginal hysterectomy training: a pilot study" 30 : 1329-1336, 2019

      4 Malik AA, "Validation and reliability of Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills for surgical residents and consultants" 66 : 18-21, 2016

      5 Sperry SM, "The University of Pennsylvania curriculum for training otorhinolaryngology residents in transoral robotic surgery" 76 : 342-352, 2014

      6 Batterton KA, "The Likert scale what it is and how to use it" 50 : 32-39, 2017

      7 LaMarca N, "The Likert Scale: advantages and disadvantages"

      8 Frederick PJ, "Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: development and validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS)" 24 : 55-61, 2017

      9 Rashid HH, "Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy" 68 : 75-79, 2006

      10 Martin JA, "Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents" 84 : 273-278, 1997

      1 Liss MA, "Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer™ and the daVinci surgical skills simulator™ using the Mimic™ software for urologic robotic surgical education" 26 : 1629-1634, 2012

      2 Vaughan MH, "Validation of the simulated vaginal hysterectomy trainer" 25 : 1101-1106, 2018

      3 Miyazaki D, "Validation of an educational simulation model for vaginal hysterectomy training: a pilot study" 30 : 1329-1336, 2019

      4 Malik AA, "Validation and reliability of Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills for surgical residents and consultants" 66 : 18-21, 2016

      5 Sperry SM, "The University of Pennsylvania curriculum for training otorhinolaryngology residents in transoral robotic surgery" 76 : 342-352, 2014

      6 Batterton KA, "The Likert scale what it is and how to use it" 50 : 32-39, 2017

      7 LaMarca N, "The Likert Scale: advantages and disadvantages"

      8 Frederick PJ, "Surgical Competency for Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy: development and validation of a Robotic Hysterectomy Assessment Score (RHAS)" 24 : 55-61, 2017

      9 Rashid HH, "Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy" 68 : 75-79, 2006

      10 Martin JA, "Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents" 84 : 273-278, 1997

      11 Sun AJ, "Novel training methods for robotic surgery" 30 : 333-338, 2014

      12 Jamieson S, "Likert scales: how to (ab)use them" 38 : 1217-1218, 2004

      13 Evans CH, "Evolving educational techniques in surgical training" 96 : 71-88, 2016

      14 Knight S, "Development of an objective assessment tool for total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a Delphi method among experts and evaluation on a virtual reality simulator" 13 : e0190580-, 2018

      15 Tunitsky-Bitton E, "Development and validation of a laparoscopic hysterectomy cuff closure simulation model for surgical training" 214 : 392.e1-392.e6, 2016

      16 Abboudi H, "Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators - a systematic review" 111 : 194-205, 2013

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2012-07-13 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한부인종양콜포스코피학회 -> 대한부인종양학회
      영문명 : Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology and Colposcopy -> Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
      KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-06-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 부인종양 -> Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Gynecologic Oncology -> Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
      KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-09-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한부인종양.콜포스코피학회지 -> 부인종양
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.18 0.12 1.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.13 0.9 0.732 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼