RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    서양 중세 두 검(Two Swords) 이론의 근대적 형상화

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100157419

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article attempts to understand the meaning of the “Two Swords” idea of the Middle Ages, and its course of transition and integration into the modern political concept. The letter Duo Sunt which was sent to the Byzantine emperor Anasthasius I (491-518) by Pope Gelasius I (492-496) and the Two Swords doctrine which was conceived by the medieval canonists and theologians served to establish the legal authority of the Church over its conflict with sacerdotal and secular powers in the Middle Ages. From the perspective of the Roman Church, the Two Swords represented the sovereignty of the Church over spiritual and secular powers and viewed this order to be completely consistent with the papal Plenitudo Potestatis. As with Saint Augustine’s interpretation of natural law, this hierarchy of power sustained that governments and laws derive their authority from God and all the rulers, therefore were subjects of the supreme Ruler. In the late thirteenth century, the medieval understanding and notion of the “Two Swords” or the “two powers” radically transformed under the influence of Aristotelian philosophy. Thomas Aquinas advocated the existence of a natural harmony between faith and reason through his efforts in uniting the Aristotelian philosophy with the principles of Christian theology – which subsequently lead to the emergence of radical and progressive intellectuals. John of Paris asserted the papal authority only to the spiritual jurisdiction, while insisting that powers on all secular affairs remained with secular rulers. This view greatly emasculated the medieval tradition and the idea of Two Swords that identified spiritual and secular powers with the Pope. Marsilius of Padua who was under the strong influence of Aristotle’s works denied the papal political sovereignty and his coercive jurisdiction. Moreover he held that general council which was consist of people was infallible, but not the Pope and consequently supported “popular sovereignty” – that spiritual powers were to be exercised by a general council. Through the works of these progressive political philosophers the idea of Two Swords evolved from its medieval roots to the shape of modern political conception.
    번역하기

    This article attempts to understand the meaning of the “Two Swords” idea of the Middle Ages, and its course of transition and integration into the modern political concept. The letter Duo Sunt which was sent to the Byzantine emperor Anasthasius ...

    This article attempts to understand the meaning of the “Two Swords” idea of the Middle Ages, and its course of transition and integration into the modern political concept. The letter Duo Sunt which was sent to the Byzantine emperor Anasthasius I (491-518) by Pope Gelasius I (492-496) and the Two Swords doctrine which was conceived by the medieval canonists and theologians served to establish the legal authority of the Church over its conflict with sacerdotal and secular powers in the Middle Ages. From the perspective of the Roman Church, the Two Swords represented the sovereignty of the Church over spiritual and secular powers and viewed this order to be completely consistent with the papal Plenitudo Potestatis. As with Saint Augustine’s interpretation of natural law, this hierarchy of power sustained that governments and laws derive their authority from God and all the rulers, therefore were subjects of the supreme Ruler. In the late thirteenth century, the medieval understanding and notion of the “Two Swords” or the “two powers” radically transformed under the influence of Aristotelian philosophy. Thomas Aquinas advocated the existence of a natural harmony between faith and reason through his efforts in uniting the Aristotelian philosophy with the principles of Christian theology – which subsequently lead to the emergence of radical and progressive intellectuals. John of Paris asserted the papal authority only to the spiritual jurisdiction, while insisting that powers on all secular affairs remained with secular rulers. This view greatly emasculated the medieval tradition and the idea of Two Swords that identified spiritual and secular powers with the Pope. Marsilius of Padua who was under the strong influence of Aristotle’s works denied the papal political sovereignty and his coercive jurisdiction. Moreover he held that general council which was consist of people was infallible, but not the Pope and consequently supported “popular sovereignty” – that spiritual powers were to be exercised by a general council. Through the works of these progressive political philosophers the idea of Two Swords evolved from its medieval roots to the shape of modern political conception.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 머리말
    • II. 두 권력론과 두 검 이론의 가교
    • III. 아리스토텔레스의 영향과 두 검 이론의 변형
    • VI. 두 검 이론의 근대적 형상화
    • V. 맺는말
    • I. 머리말
    • II. 두 권력론과 두 검 이론의 가교
    • III. 아리스토텔레스의 영향과 두 검 이론의 변형
    • VI. 두 검 이론의 근대적 형상화
    • V. 맺는말
    • <참고문헌>
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이희만, "존 솔즈베리의 국가 유기체론-제도화를 중심으로-" 한국서양사학회 (106) : 113-141, 2010

    2 강치원, "마르실리우스의 政治思想에 있어서의 아리스토텔레스的 要素" 14 (14): 1986

    3 박경자, "마르실리우스 파도바의 법 개념과 근대성 ―강제성을 중심으로―" 철학연구소 24 : 205-226, 2011

    4 조지프 R 스트레이어, "국가의탄생: 근대국가의 중세적 기원" 학고방 2012

    5 장준철, "교령 Duo sunt 에 나타난 두 권력 이론" 한국서양중세사학회 10 (10): 1997

    6 박은구, "William of Ockham의 世俗政府論" 3 : 1985

    7 Thomas Aquinas, "William Baumgarth and Richard Regan" Hackett Publishing co. 1988

    8 김병곤, "Thomas Aquinas의 중세 자연법 사상: Aristotle 철학의 스콜라적 변용" 29 (29): 1995

    9 Kennan, Elizabeth, "The ‘De Consideratione’ of St. Bernard of Clairvaus and the papacy in the mid-twelfth century: a review of scholarship" 23 : 1967

    10 Clark, Delane Eugene, "The Two Swords Controversy and the Roots of Modern Political Theory" University of Virginia 1989

    1 이희만, "존 솔즈베리의 국가 유기체론-제도화를 중심으로-" 한국서양사학회 (106) : 113-141, 2010

    2 강치원, "마르실리우스의 政治思想에 있어서의 아리스토텔레스的 要素" 14 (14): 1986

    3 박경자, "마르실리우스 파도바의 법 개념과 근대성 ―강제성을 중심으로―" 철학연구소 24 : 205-226, 2011

    4 조지프 R 스트레이어, "국가의탄생: 근대국가의 중세적 기원" 학고방 2012

    5 장준철, "교령 Duo sunt 에 나타난 두 권력 이론" 한국서양중세사학회 10 (10): 1997

    6 박은구, "William of Ockham의 世俗政府論" 3 : 1985

    7 Thomas Aquinas, "William Baumgarth and Richard Regan" Hackett Publishing co. 1988

    8 김병곤, "Thomas Aquinas의 중세 자연법 사상: Aristotle 철학의 스콜라적 변용" 29 (29): 1995

    9 Kennan, Elizabeth, "The ‘De Consideratione’ of St. Bernard of Clairvaus and the papacy in the mid-twelfth century: a review of scholarship" 23 : 1967

    10 Clark, Delane Eugene, "The Two Swords Controversy and the Roots of Modern Political Theory" University of Virginia 1989

    11 Nelson, Daniel, "The Priority of Prudence: Virtue and Natural Law in Thomas Aquinas and the Implications for Modern Ethics" Pennsylvania State UP 1992

    12 Finnis, John, "The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law" Oxford University Press 2002

    13 Bix, Brian, "The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law" Oxford UP 2002

    14 Baun, Karl, "The Imperial Church from Constantine to the early Middle Ages" The Seabury Press 1980

    15 Ullmann, Walter, "The Growth of Papal Government in the Middle Ages" 1955

    16 Thomson, JAK, "The Ethics of Aristotle. book V" Penguin Classics 1953

    17 Carlyle,A. J, "The Development of the Theory of the Authority of the Spiritual over the Tempral Power from Gregory VII to Innoent III" 5 : 1923

    18 Gregory VII, "The Correspondence of Pope Gregory VII" Columbia UP 1932

    19 Thomas Aquinas, "Summa Theologica. II" Marietti 1948

    20 Grosseteste, Robert, "Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy" 2006

    21 Ziegler, Aloysius K., "Pope Gelasius I and His Teaching on the Relation of Church and State" 27 : 1942

    22 Aristotle, "Politics. I" Oxford UP 1995

    23 Bigongiari, Dino, "Political Ideas of St. Thomas Aquinas" Hafner Pub. Co. 1966

    24 John of Salisbury, "Policraticus 4. 3" Cambridge UP 1990

    25 Ullmann, Walter, "Personality and Territoriality in the Defeonsor Pacis : the Problem of Political Humanism" 6 : 1980

    26 Bernardus, "Patrologiae Latinae Cursus Completus. Vol. 185" Parisiis 1844

    27 Bernardus, "Patrologiae Latinae Cursus Completus. Vol. 182" Parisiis 1844

    28 Bernardus, "Patrologiae Latinae Cursus Completus. Vol. 182" Parisiis 1844

    29 Floriacensis, Hugo, "Patrologiae Latinae Cursus Completus. Vol. 163" Parisiis 1844

    30 Thomas Aquinas, "On the government of rulers : De regimine principum" U of Pennsylvania P 1997

    31 John of Paris, "On Royal and Papal Power" Columbia UP 1974

    32 Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics. vol 10" Clarendon Press 1998

    33 Bernard, Yack, "Natural Right and Aristotle's Understanding of Justice" 18 (18): 1990

    34 Hull, Robert, "Medieval Theories of the Papacy and the other Essays" Burns Oates & Washbourne Ltd. 1932

    35 Lewis, Ewart, "Medieval Political Ideas" Knopf 1954

    36 박은구, "Marsilius of Padua의 人民論 分析" 49 : 2001

    37 박은구, "Marsilius of Padua의 人民州權論: 政府論을 중심으로" 44 : 2002

    38 Walram, bp. of Naumburg, "MGH" impensis bibliopolii Hahniani 1883

    39 Freeman, Michael, "Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence" Sweet & Maxwell 2001

    40 Leiboff, Marett, "Legal Theories in Principle" Lawbook 2004

    41 Leclercq, "Jean de Paris et l'ecclesiologie du Xllle siecle" 1942

    42 JOANNES Parisiensis, "J. A. Watt" Pontificial Institute of Mediaeval Studies 1971

    43 Stickler, A.M, "Iln’gladius’ nel Registro di Gregorio VII" 3 : 1948

    44 Schaff, Philip, "History of the Christian Church. Vol. 6: The Middle Ages A.D. 1294-1517" Wm. B. Eerdmans 1910

    45 Kloisk, George, "History of Political Theory : An Introduction. Vol. I: Ancient and Medieval" Oxford UP 2012

    46 Kilcullen, John, "Handbook of Political Theory" Sage Publication 2004

    47 Küng, Hans, "Great Christian Thinkers" Continuum 1994

    48 Ullmann, Walter, "Gelasius I, (492-496): das Papsttum an der Wende der Satantike" A. Hiersemann 1981

    49 Tierney, Brian, "Foundations of the conciliar theory; the contribution of the medieval canonists from Gratian to the Great Schism" Cambridge UP 1955

    50 Thiel, Andrea, "Epistolae Romanorum Pntificum a S. Hilario usque S. Hormisdam" Brundbergae 1868

    51 Dvornik, Fransis, "Early Christian and Byzantine Political Philosophy: Origins and Background. Vol.2" Dumbarton Oaks 1966

    52 Swanson, R.N, "Doctrine of Two Swords" 12 :

    53 Stickler, A. M, "De ecclesiae potestate coactiva materiali apud Magistrum Gratianum" 4 : 1941

    54 Dvornik, Fransis, "Byzantine and the Roman Primacy" Fordham UP 1979

    55 Fliche, A, "Bernard de Clairvaus" 1953

    56 D'Entrèves, Alessandro Passerin, "Aquinas: Selected Political Writings" Mcmillan Co 1959

    57 Vieru, Simona, "ARISTOTLE’S INFLUENCE ON THE NATURAL LAW THEORY OF ST THOMAS AQUINAS" 1 : 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.4 0.4 0.49
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.45 0.43 1.181 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼