RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Comparison of Segmental Mobility in Lumbar Extension Radiographs between a New Technique (“Fulcrum Bending Position”) and Conventional Standing Position in Spondylolisthesis Patients

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106477909

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Study Design: Cross-sectional study.
      Purpose: This was carried out to evaluate the benefit of a ‘fulcrum bending position’ compared with the standing position for evaluation of sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis.
      Overview of Literature: In lumbar X-ray, the standing position is the most common position used in determining abnormalities in lumbar movement. Lack of standardized method is one of the pitfalls in this technique. We hypothesized that the new technique, that is, fulcrum bending position, may reveal a higher translation and rotation in spondylolisthesis patients.
      Methods: The extension lumbar radiographs of 36 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis were included in the analysis and measurement. Sagittal translation and sagittal rotation were measured in both the routine standing position and in our new technique, the fulcrum bending position, which involves taking lateral cross-table images in the supine position wherein the patient lies on a cylindrical pipe to achieve maximum passive back extension by the fulcrum principle.
      Results: Results of the measurement of sagittal translation in both positions revealed that compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 1.57 mm in translation of the vertebra position (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–2.61; p=0.004). The measurement of sagittal rotation in both positions revealed that when compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 3.47° in the rotation of the vertebra (95% CI, 1.64–5.30; p<0.001).
      Conclusions: For evaluation of both sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis, compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position can achieve an increased change in magnitude. Our technique, that is, the fulcrum bending position, may offer an alternative method in the detection or exclusion of pathological mobility in patients with spondylolisthesis.
      번역하기

      Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Purpose: This was carried out to evaluate the benefit of a ‘fulcrum bending position’ compared with the standing position for evaluation of sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients wit...

      Study Design: Cross-sectional study.
      Purpose: This was carried out to evaluate the benefit of a ‘fulcrum bending position’ compared with the standing position for evaluation of sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis.
      Overview of Literature: In lumbar X-ray, the standing position is the most common position used in determining abnormalities in lumbar movement. Lack of standardized method is one of the pitfalls in this technique. We hypothesized that the new technique, that is, fulcrum bending position, may reveal a higher translation and rotation in spondylolisthesis patients.
      Methods: The extension lumbar radiographs of 36 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis were included in the analysis and measurement. Sagittal translation and sagittal rotation were measured in both the routine standing position and in our new technique, the fulcrum bending position, which involves taking lateral cross-table images in the supine position wherein the patient lies on a cylindrical pipe to achieve maximum passive back extension by the fulcrum principle.
      Results: Results of the measurement of sagittal translation in both positions revealed that compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 1.57 mm in translation of the vertebra position (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–2.61; p=0.004). The measurement of sagittal rotation in both positions revealed that when compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position achieved a statistically significant increase of 3.47° in the rotation of the vertebra (95% CI, 1.64–5.30; p<0.001).
      Conclusions: For evaluation of both sagittal translation and sagittal rotation in symptomatic patients with spondylolisthesis, compared with the extension standing position, the fulcrum bending position can achieve an increased change in magnitude. Our technique, that is, the fulcrum bending position, may offer an alternative method in the detection or exclusion of pathological mobility in patients with spondylolisthesis.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Kanemura A, "The influence of sagittal instability factors on clinical lumbar spinal symptoms" 22 : 479-485, 2009

      2 Pearcy M, "The effect of lowback pain on lumbar spinal movements measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis" 10 : 150-153, 1985

      3 Cabraja M, "The analysis of segmental mobility with different lumbar radiographs in symptomatic patients with a spondylolisthesis" 21 : 256-261, 2012

      4 Wiltse LL, "Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis" 35 : 116-135, 1964

      5 Lowe RW, "Standing roentgenograms in spondylolisthesis" 117 : 80-84, 1976

      6 Pitkanen MT, "Segmental lumbar spine instability at flexion-extension radiography can be predicted by conventional radiography" 57 : 632-639, 2002

      7 Hayes MA, "Roentgenographic evaluation of lumbar spine flexionextension in asymptomatic individuals" 14 : 327-331, 1989

      8 Dupuis PR, "Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability" 10 : 262-276, 1985

      9 Wood KB, "Radiographic evaluation of instability in spondylolisthesis" 19 : 1697-1703, 1994

      10 Guyer RD, "Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion : five-year followup" 9 : 374-386, 2009

      1 Kanemura A, "The influence of sagittal instability factors on clinical lumbar spinal symptoms" 22 : 479-485, 2009

      2 Pearcy M, "The effect of lowback pain on lumbar spinal movements measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis" 10 : 150-153, 1985

      3 Cabraja M, "The analysis of segmental mobility with different lumbar radiographs in symptomatic patients with a spondylolisthesis" 21 : 256-261, 2012

      4 Wiltse LL, "Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis" 35 : 116-135, 1964

      5 Lowe RW, "Standing roentgenograms in spondylolisthesis" 117 : 80-84, 1976

      6 Pitkanen MT, "Segmental lumbar spine instability at flexion-extension radiography can be predicted by conventional radiography" 57 : 632-639, 2002

      7 Hayes MA, "Roentgenographic evaluation of lumbar spine flexionextension in asymptomatic individuals" 14 : 327-331, 1989

      8 Dupuis PR, "Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability" 10 : 262-276, 1985

      9 Wood KB, "Radiographic evaluation of instability in spondylolisthesis" 19 : 1697-1703, 1994

      10 Guyer RD, "Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion : five-year followup" 9 : 374-386, 2009

      11 Morgan FP, "Primary instability of lumbar vertebrae as a common cause of low back pain" 39-B : 6-22, 1957

      12 Thome C, "Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis : a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy" 3 : 129-141, 2005

      13 Pennal GF, "Motion studies of the lumbar spine : a preliminary report" 54 : 442-452, 1972

      14 Nachemson AL, "Mechanical properties of human lumbar spine motion segments : influence of age, sex, disc level, and degeneration" 4 : 1-8, 1979

      15 Friberg O, "Lumbar instability : a dynamic approach by traction-compression radiography" 12 : 119-129, 1987

      16 Kirkaldy-Willis WH, "Instability of the lumbar spine" 165 : 110-123, 1982

      17 Penning L, "Instability in lumbar spondylolisthesis : a radiologic study of several concepts" 134 : 293-301, 1980

      18 Quinnell RC, "Flexion and extension radiography of the lumbar spine : a comparison with lumbar discography" 34 : 405-411, 1983

      19 Epstein NE, "Decompression in the surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis : advantages of a conservative approach in 290 patients" 11 : 116-122, 1998

      20 Panjabi M, "A mathematical approach for three-dimensional analysis of the mechanics of the spine" 4 : 203-211, 1971

      21 Posner I, "A biomechanical analysis of the clinical stability of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine" 7 : 374-389, 1982

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재 탈락 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼