RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    바울의 새 관점과 이신칭의 교리: 칭의의 기독론, 인간론, 종말론적 측면에 관하여 = The New Perspective on Paul and the Doctrine of Justification: The Christological, Anthropological and Eschatological Aspect

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82420411

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The doctrine of justification according to the reformers was a church dividing issue, and truly it was the cause of separation between the Roman Catholic and Protestant. In recent years the discussion on the doctrine of justification has been revived, and in fact it has become one of the most controversial issue in modern scholarship. Not only in the field of systematic theology but also in the biblical scholarship there is a renewed interest in this subject. The rise of the new perspective on Paul was a momentum to review the reformation`s doctrine of justification by faith, and in fact the Pauline studies as a whole. This thesis tries to identify, first of all, the central issue of the current discussion on the doctrine of justification, and attempts to suggest a way to understand the issue better. We first carried out a brief survey in order to identify the central argument of the Roman Catholic and Protestant respectively. The theological principle of the Roman Catholic`s development of the doctrine of justification was based on their anthropological interest. Whereas the reformers articulated their doctrine in the christological perspective, and saw justification basically as God`s forensic declaration of not guilty on account of the believers` faith in Christ. In the second half of the thesis, we briefly looked at the main argument of the New Perspective on Paul especially concerning theirdoctrine of justification. The pros and cons of their argument are weighted up, and we concluded that The NPP`s doctrine of justification somehow try to integrate the Catholic`s doctrine of justification with that ofthe reformers. Then after considering the main arguments of Catholic, Protestant and the NPP, we suggest that in order to understanding thedoctrine of justification more comprehensively and biblically we should understand the doctrine in the three perspectives of christology, anthropology and eschatology.
    번역하기

    The doctrine of justification according to the reformers was a church dividing issue, and truly it was the cause of separation between the Roman Catholic and Protestant. In recent years the discussion on the doctrine of justification has been revived,...

    The doctrine of justification according to the reformers was a church dividing issue, and truly it was the cause of separation between the Roman Catholic and Protestant. In recent years the discussion on the doctrine of justification has been revived, and in fact it has become one of the most controversial issue in modern scholarship. Not only in the field of systematic theology but also in the biblical scholarship there is a renewed interest in this subject. The rise of the new perspective on Paul was a momentum to review the reformation`s doctrine of justification by faith, and in fact the Pauline studies as a whole. This thesis tries to identify, first of all, the central issue of the current discussion on the doctrine of justification, and attempts to suggest a way to understand the issue better. We first carried out a brief survey in order to identify the central argument of the Roman Catholic and Protestant respectively. The theological principle of the Roman Catholic`s development of the doctrine of justification was based on their anthropological interest. Whereas the reformers articulated their doctrine in the christological perspective, and saw justification basically as God`s forensic declaration of not guilty on account of the believers` faith in Christ. In the second half of the thesis, we briefly looked at the main argument of the New Perspective on Paul especially concerning theirdoctrine of justification. The pros and cons of their argument are weighted up, and we concluded that The NPP`s doctrine of justification somehow try to integrate the Catholic`s doctrine of justification with that ofthe reformers. Then after considering the main arguments of Catholic, Protestant and the NPP, we suggest that in order to understanding thedoctrine of justification more comprehensively and biblically we should understand the doctrine in the three perspectives of christology, anthropology and eschatology.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼