신지역주의와 아셈: 세 가지 층위의 지역 = New Regionalism and ASEM: Three different levels of Regionalization

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In order to show that Asia-Europe Summit launched in 1996 did not only favour the Asia-Europe relations but also encouraged the Asian regionalization process as well as the ASEAN-EU relations, this article suggest to see the type of ASEM's inter-regionalism as an hybrid inter-regionalism heading towards a pure inter- regionalism. Unlike the APEC, which followed a transregional path, ASEM which grew out of the explicitly interregional format (EU-ASEAN), developed a region-to-region dialogue which helped influence and shape the very concept of an East Asian region.
Conceptualized under the impact of ‘New Regionalism’, which galvanized the regionalization process in order to adapt to globalization, the ASEM inter- regionalism comprises three different levels of regionalism in itself : the ASEAN-EU interregional relations which consists the corner stone of ASEM ; the extension of ASEAN-EU relations including China, Japan and South Korea (i.e. ASEM triadic interregional relations); and the process of the Asian regionalization with the development of the “ASEAN+3” process at the heart of ASEM. Generating thus three different levels of regionalization, the ASEM inter- regionalism process offers a means of managing relations in a globalising world.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

세계화의 경향과 더불어서 새로이 부상된 신지역주의의 영향 아래서 발족된 아셈(ASEM) 즉 아시아 유럽의 지역간 협력체(inter-regionalism)는 다음과 같은 세 가지 각기 다른 층위의 지역주의를 내포한다. 첫째 아셈의 초석을 이루는 아세안(ASEAN)과 유럽공동체(European Community)의 지역 대 지역(region to region) 관계, 둘째 앞의 첫 번째 층위의 지역보다 한층 더 확장된 지역간 관계인 (enlarged inter-regionalism) ASEAN+ 3개국과 유럽공동체의 관계, 셋째 아셈의 활동이 촉매시킨 동아시아 공동체의 핵을 이루는 ASEAN+3의 부상과 동아시아 지역주의가 그것이다.이처럼 아셈 속에 세 가지 층위의 지역주의가 내포될 수 있는 것은 지역간 협력체인 아셈이 혼종 지역간 주의(hybrid inter-regionalism)에서 순수 지역간 주의(pure inter- regionalism)로 변화되는 과정을 겪기 때문이다. 다시 말하면 아셈의 유럽 파트너가 아시아 국가들을 하나의 지역 파트너로 간주함으로써 아셈 속에서의 아시아 파트너는 하나의 지역처럼 기능하기 시작했음을 말한다. 아세안과 유럽공동체의 지역 대 지역 관계의 확장된 형태로서의 지역간 협력체인 아셈은 동아시아와 유럽의 상호협력을 증진시켰을 뿐 아니라 동아시아에 부족했던 정체성을 제공하면서 동아시아 지역 협력을 촉진시키고 ASEAN+3를 가시화하는데 기여하였다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "제3차 ASEM 정상회의 : 경제협력분야의 성과와 발전 전략" 서울 : 대외경제정책연구소 2000

2 "Towards an Asia Europe Partnership : A perspective from Asia" XXIV (XXIV): 38-58, 1996

3 "Towards East Asian Community? What ASEM and APEC can tell us" University of Warwick (117/03) : June2003

4 "Thinking Strategically about ASEM : The Subsidiarity Question" 10 (10): 124-134, 1997

5 "Theorising the Rise of Regionness" 5 (5): 457-473, November2000

6 "The rise of the Region State" 78-87, spring1992

7 "The US and ASEM : Why the hegemon didn’t bark" 12 (12): 103-128, 1999

8 "The Political Economy of Regionalism" 1997

9 "The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific" Lexington Lexington Books 1991

10 "The European in South-East Asia: continuity and change in turbulent times" 75 (75): 743-758, 1999.10

11 "The EU as a Global Actor and the role fo Interregionalism" 27 (27): 249-262, 2005.09

12 "The Development of Europe’s linkages with East Asia : Hybrid Trans-Regionalism" Institute of European Studies. University of California Berkeley 2002-2003 : December2002

13 "Social Theory of International Politics" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999

14 "Regionalism through interregionalism" Routledge, Curzon 197-219, 2003

15 "Regionalism in World Politics : Regional Organization and International Order" Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995

16 "Regionalism and Asia" 5 (5): 353-368, November2000

17 "Regional Integration in Europe and Asia" 2006

18 "Rapport sur la communication de la Commission sur un cadre stratgique pour renforcer les relations de partenariat Europe-Asie (COM (2001) 469 C5-0255/2002 2002/2120 (COS))" (A5-0270/2002) : 16juillet2002

19 "Pour une nouvelle dynamique dans les relations entre l’Union europenne et l’ASEAN" 1996.01.16

20 "New Interregionalism : The EU and East Asia" 27 (27): 307-326, 2005.09

21 "Multilateralism and U.S. Grand Strategy" Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner 121-140, 2002

22 "Mondialisation et rgionalisation dans les pays en dveloppement - les deux faces de Janus" (2) : 257-264, 1997

23 "L'Asie et l’Europe : une nouvelle alliance pour le XXIe sicle" (4) : 1099-1106, 1995

24 "Introduction : Asian Regionalism in Comparative Perspective" Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press 1-44, 1997

25 "Interregionalism, and the Crisis of Multilateralism : How to keep the Asia-Europe(ASEM) Relevant" II-1 : 45-62, 2006

26 "Interregionalism and World Order" Netherlands Congress Centre, the Hague 2004.9.9-11

27 "Inter and Transregionalism : Remarks on the State of the Art of a New Research Agenda" Australian National University, National Europe Centre (34) : 2002.7.5-6

28 "Globalization and Politics" 3 : 43-62, June2000

29 "Globalism and the new regionalism" UNU/Wider Study, Palgrave 1 : 1999

30 "Evaluating the EU-ASEM relationship : a negotiated order approach" 7 (7): 787-805, 2000

31 "European Union and New Regionalism : Regional actors and global governance in a post-hegemonic era" Aldershot: Ashgate 2001

32 "East Asian Regionalism" 2000.7.15

33 "Doha: un essai transformer. Le Bilan de la quatrime Confrence ministrielle de l’OMC (9-13 novembre 2001)" (3569) : le31janvier2002

34 "De Facto and De Jure Regionalism : The Double Discourse of Regionalism in the Asia Pacific" 11 (11): 165-183, 1997

35 "Commission of the European Communities" 1994

36 "Bulletin Quotidien Europe" (6475) : 1995.5.6

37 "Bulletin EC. June 1992, point. 1.4.26." Bulletin EC June1992

38 "Asia meets Europe, inter-regionalism and the Asia- Europe meeting" Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar 2002

39 "ASEM: Le dialogue Euro-Asie au point mort" 2007

40 "ASEM and the Evolving Global Order" Seoul: KIEP 11-47, August,2000

41 "ASEM and the Construction of the New Triad" 4 (4): 56-80, 1999

42 "AFP. September 26, 2004" AFP 2004.9.26