Is Auditory Steady-State Response Testing the Key for Diagnosing Non-Organic Hearing Disorders? Implications for Current Audiological Practice

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background and Objectives: To describe all possible facets of non-organic hearing disorders (NOHD) and emphasize the superiority of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) over previously employed hearing assessment tools. Subjects and Methods: A series of seven patients consisting of three males and four females with NOHD were assessed at Attikon University Hospital (age range: 17-59 years). Three patients had Munchausen syndrome, three intentionally feigned hearing loss, and one intentionally feigned normal hearing. The audiological evaluation consisted of tympanometry, pure-tone audiometry, and ASSR testing.Results: The hearing of all patients was accurately determined using ASSR. The results were confirmed by auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and otoacoustic emissions. Conclusions: NOHD is a multi-faceted condition encompassing various etiologies. ASSR testing represents an objective and reliable method of hearing assessment, which can serve as a gold standard method for distinguishing NOHD from actual hearing loss. It can reliably indicate the hearing levels at the four main frequencies (500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz) by obtaining a valid estimated audiogram through statistical measures. Compared to ABR testing, ASSR thresholds are closer to the actual audiometric thresholds in the presence of hearing impairment and are superior when the corresponding pure-tone audiogram is widely ranging between the adjacent frequencies or when the obtained ABR curves are not easily distinguished. A non-confrontational approach should be adopted by ENT doctors towards cases of suspected NOHD as the use of ASSR could reliably assess hearing even when medical or medico-legal implications are involved.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Vlastarakos PV, "The value of ASSR threshold-based bilateral hearing aid fitting in children with difficult or unreliable behavioral audiometry" 96 : 464-468, 2017

2 Rance G, "The auditory steady-state response: generation, recording, and clinical application" Plural Publishing 152-, 2008

3 Kemp DT, "Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system" 64 : 1386-1391, 1978

4 Mehta AK, "Screening tests for nonorganic hearing loss" 56 : 79-81, 2000

5 Musat G, "Hearing assesment of a malingering patient" 21 : 41-46, 2013

6 Gelfand SA, "Functional hearing loss and its relationship to resolved hearing levels" 6 : 151-158, 1985

7 Dimitrijevic A, "Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses" 13 : 205-224, 2002

8 Durmaz A, "Efficiency of Stenger test in confirming profound, unilateral pseudohypacusis" 123 : 840-844, 2009

9 Tiffany WR, "Delayed speech feedback as a test for auditory malingering" 115 : 59-60, 1952

10 Brown K, "Definition of ‘deception’. The Cambridge Dictionary of Linguistics" Cambridge University Press 2019

11 Goetzinger CP, "Deafness; examination techniques for evaluating malingering and psychogenic disabilities" 59 : 95-101, 1958

12 Nober EH, "Communication Disorders" Springer 275-297, 1981

13 Stapells DR, "A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification" Phonak 67-105, 2010