일본에서의 가사비송사건 절차의 규율

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Japan recently enacted a new act to replace the Act for Determination of Domestic Relations regarding the non–litigious domestic case procedures and is scheduled to implement it. The new act calls cases for determination of domestic relations and family mediation and is entitled “Domestic Case Proceedings Act” to indicate it regulates domestic case procedures.
One of the characteristics of the revision is that the new act establishes a so–called self–concluding domestic case proceedings act instead of applying other procedure regulations.
The recent revision of the regulations of the non–litigious domestic case procedures has great implications for the interpretations of Korean acts on domestic case procedures and the revision of the Korean domestic litigation act. Thus this study set out to compare the Domestic Case Proceedings Act with the operative and Korean one in terms of main content.
The most important point of the new Japanese act is the establishment and expansion of the procedural guarantees. It especially has “Special Regulations of Determination of Domestic Relations Procedures on Matters for Family Medication” and is particularly considerate of procedural guarantees.
One of the special regulations of domestic case determination procedures on matters for family mediation is that it is mandatory to issue a notice of case continuance in case of request for domestic case determination of such a kind. The current Korean act has no such regulation on notice of case continuance, which raises a need to establish such a regulation to practically guarantee the concerned party’s right to interrogation request.
In addition, the Korean domestic litigation act has no device to obtain access to the data submitted by the opponent and the data collected by the court,which is a deficiency in procedural guarantees. The new Japanese act has a provision to make one issue a notice of facts investigation to the concerned party in the non–litigious domestic case procedures.
In future, the revision of the Korean domestic litigation act should move toward revision into a self–concluding act that is easy for users to know in addition to procedural guarantees for the concerned party.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김원태, "재판 외 분쟁해결제도의 현상과 과제" 충북대학교 법학연구소 22 (22): 2011

2 김원태, "일본의 부양료 채무 등의 이행확보제도"

3 김원태, "성년후견 등 심판절차에 관한 가사소송법 정비 방안에 대한 관견" 한국재산법학회 28 (28): 265-302, 2011

4 서정우, "새 가사소송법의 개설, In ｢가족법학논총｣, 박병호교수 환갑기념(Ⅰ)" 박영사 1991

5 반흥식, "비송사건절차에 있어서의 직권탐지주의 – 독일 가사 및 비송사건절차법을 중심으로 –" 한국민사소송법학회 15 (15): 55-91, 2011

6 반흥식, "비송사건절차에 있어서의 자유증명의 대상과 적용범위 -독일가사비송사건절차법(FamFG)에 관한 내용을 중심으로-" 법학연구소 25 (25): 9-38, 2009

7 김원태, "미국 뉴욕 주의 성년후견 심판절차" 한국가족법학회 25 (25): 185-214, 2011

8 김상일, "독일의 [가사사건 및 비송사건 절차법(FamFG)] 개관" 한국민사소송법학회 13 (13): 622-651, 2009

9 반흥식, "독일 가사 및 비송사건절차법의 내용과 구조 – 비송사건을 중심으로 –" 한국민사소송법학회 15 (15): 44-81, 2011

10 권오엽, "가사조정제도의 문제점과 과제" 한국비교사법학회 13 (13): 53-84, 2006

11 김원태, "가사조정절차의 특색과 절차보장" 한국가족법학회 (9) : 1995

12 김원태, "가사소송절차에 관한 몇 가지 문제점" 법학연구소 20 (20): 121-158, 2009

13 김원태, "가사소송에서의 처분권주의의 제한에 대한 재검토" 한국민사소송법학회 3 : 2000

14 金元泰, "가사소송에서의 절차보장에 관한 연구" 釜山大學校 大學院 1995

15 佐上善和, "非訟･家事審判事件における不服申立て" 有斐閣 (1407) : 2010

16 本間靖規, "非訟手續･家事審判手續における當事者･關係人の地位" 有斐閣 (1407) : 2010

17 本間靖規, "非訟事件手續･家事事件手續における裁判所の役割" 日本評論社 83 (83): 2011

18 德田和幸, "非訟事件手續･家事事件手續における當事者等の手續保障" 日本評論社 83 (83): 2011

19 長谷部由起子, "非訟事件手續･家事事件手續における實效性確保 – 審判前の保全處分に關する法改正–" 日本評論社 83 (83): 2011

20 三木浩一, "非訟事件手續法･家事審判法改正の課題" 有斐閣 (1407) : 2010

21 山本和彦, "非訟事件手續法･家事事件手續法の制定の理念と課題" 日本評論社 83 (83): 2011

22 山田文, "非訟事件における審理原則" 有斐閣 (1407) : 2010

23 畑瑞橞, "相手方がある非訟･家事審判事件における當事者對立構造と手續規律" 有斐閣 (1407) : 2010

24 山本和彦, "手續保障再考 – 實質的手續保障と迅速訴訟手續–, In 民事紛爭と手續理論の現在" 法律文化社 2008

25 垣內秀介, "家事調停と家事審判との關係" 有斐閣 (1407) : 2010

26 佐上善和, "家事審判･家事調停の改革についての評價と課題 – 手續法の觀點から–" 日本評論社 83 (83): 2011

27 梶村太市, "家事審判･家事調停の改革についての評價と課題 – 實務家の視點から–" 日本評論社 83 (83): 2011

28 梶村太市, "家事審判法改正の論点をめぐって" 日本加除出版株式會社 (651) : 2010

29 竹下守夫, "家事審判法改正の課題" 日本最高裁判所事務總局家庭局 61 (61): 2009

30 佐上善和, "家事審判法" 新山社 2007

31 增田勝久, "家事審判手續における子どもの地位と子どもの代理人" 有斐閣 (1407) : 2010

32 本間靖規, "家事審判と手續保障, In 辯論と證據調べの理論と實踐" 法律文化社 2002

33 梶村太市, "家事事件手續法の意義と今後の展望 –家族法硏究の立場から–" ぎょうせい 2011

34 木內道祥, "家事事件手續法の意義と今後の展望 – 辯護士の立場から– 家事事件手續法による手續保障と家事調停への影響" ぎょうせい 2011

35 淸水硏一, "家事事件手續法の意義と今後の展望 – 裁判官の立場から–" 法律のひろば 2011

36 山本和彦, "家事事件手續法の意義と今後の展望 – 民事訴訟法硏究者の視點から–" ぎょうせい 2011

37 金子修, "家事事件手續法の制定の經緯とその槪要" ぎょうせい 2011

38 本山敦, "家事事件手續法と子どもの代理人" 日本加除出版株式會社 (676) : 2010

39 本辯護士聯合會家事法制委員會, "家事事件における子どもの地位 – 子ども代理人 を考える–" 日本加除出版株式會社 2010

40 金子修, "一問一答 家事事件手續法" 2012

41 板本正幸, "Q&A 家事事件手續法の要點" 新日本法規 2012