RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      읽기 이해력 예측 지표로서의 읽기 유창성 평가의 타당도 분석 = The validity of ORF(Oral Reading Fluency) in EFL(English As a Foreign Language) context

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99536043

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of the present study was to analyze the validity of ORF(Oral Reading Fluency) in EFL(English As a Foreign Language) context and its empirical application on elementary grades in Korea. Participants were 194 students in Grades 5 to 6 from an elementary school. DORF(Dibels Oral Reading Fluency) test, including the reading fluency test and retelling fluency test were administered. In order to analyze these data with other criterion tests in Korea, such as TOSEL(Test of the Skills in the English Language) and NEAT(National English Ability Test), correlations and discriminant analyses were conducted. Results were as follows: First, the correlations between the reading fluency test and other criterion measures were high. Especially, the highest correlation coefficient was found between DORF and TOSEL Second, in comparison grade level between Korea and United States, the levels of reading fluency difference were 4-5 years and the gap were getting wide. Results were discussed in the context of educational decision-making process.
      번역하기

      The purpose of the present study was to analyze the validity of ORF(Oral Reading Fluency) in EFL(English As a Foreign Language) context and its empirical application on elementary grades in Korea. Participants were 194 students in Grades 5 to 6 from a...

      The purpose of the present study was to analyze the validity of ORF(Oral Reading Fluency) in EFL(English As a Foreign Language) context and its empirical application on elementary grades in Korea. Participants were 194 students in Grades 5 to 6 from an elementary school. DORF(Dibels Oral Reading Fluency) test, including the reading fluency test and retelling fluency test were administered. In order to analyze these data with other criterion tests in Korea, such as TOSEL(Test of the Skills in the English Language) and NEAT(National English Ability Test), correlations and discriminant analyses were conducted. Results were as follows: First, the correlations between the reading fluency test and other criterion measures were high. Especially, the highest correlation coefficient was found between DORF and TOSEL Second, in comparison grade level between Korea and United States, the levels of reading fluency difference were 4-5 years and the gap were getting wide. Results were discussed in the context of educational decision-making process.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 분석
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 함의
      • Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 분석
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 함의
      • 참고 문헌
      • 〈부록〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이일화, "학령기 초기의 읽기 유창성과 독해력 수준과의 관계" 서울대학교 2002

      2 박영예, "초등학생들의 초기 읽기 능력과 구두읽기 유창성의 관계" 한국초등영어교육학회 16 (16): 29-52, 2010

      3 서흥욱, "초등학교 저학년 학생의 읽기 발달에 대한 연구" 서울대학교 2002

      4 김동일, "읽기 발달과 읽기 능력에 대한 탐색적 연구" 14 (14): 97-101, 1997

      5 임현빈, "영어 듣기와 읽기의 상관관계에 대한 연구" 고려대학교 2004

      6 홍여진, "벤치마크 평가가 초등저학년 읽기발달에 미치는 영향" 중앙대학교 2010

      7 김동일, "기초학습기능 수행평가체제 읽기 검사 검사요강.서울" 학지사 2000

      8 Hintze, J. M, "an investigation of the effect ofpassage difficulty level on outcomes of oral reading fluency progress monitoring" 27 (27): 433-445, 1998

      9 LeBerge, D, "Toward a theory of automatic information processingin reading" 6 : 293-323, 1974

      10 Fuchs, L. S, "The validity of informal measures ofreading comprehension" 9 (9): 20-28, 1988

      1 이일화, "학령기 초기의 읽기 유창성과 독해력 수준과의 관계" 서울대학교 2002

      2 박영예, "초등학생들의 초기 읽기 능력과 구두읽기 유창성의 관계" 한국초등영어교육학회 16 (16): 29-52, 2010

      3 서흥욱, "초등학교 저학년 학생의 읽기 발달에 대한 연구" 서울대학교 2002

      4 김동일, "읽기 발달과 읽기 능력에 대한 탐색적 연구" 14 (14): 97-101, 1997

      5 임현빈, "영어 듣기와 읽기의 상관관계에 대한 연구" 고려대학교 2004

      6 홍여진, "벤치마크 평가가 초등저학년 읽기발달에 미치는 영향" 중앙대학교 2010

      7 김동일, "기초학습기능 수행평가체제 읽기 검사 검사요강.서울" 학지사 2000

      8 Hintze, J. M, "an investigation of the effect ofpassage difficulty level on outcomes of oral reading fluency progress monitoring" 27 (27): 433-445, 1998

      9 LeBerge, D, "Toward a theory of automatic information processingin reading" 6 : 293-323, 1974

      10 Fuchs, L. S, "The validity of informal measures ofreading comprehension" 9 (9): 20-28, 1988

      11 Nathan, R. G., "The causes and consequences of differencesin reading fluency" 30 : 176-184, 1991

      12 Rasinski, T. V, "The Fluent Reader. Jefferson" Scholastic Inc 2003

      13 National Reading Panel, "Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessmentof the scientific search literature on reading an implication for readinginstruction" National Institute of Child Health and HumanDevelopment 2000

      14 Lynn S. Fuchs, "Scientific Studies of Reading" 5 (5): 239-256, 2001

      15 Hintze, J. M., "Oral reading fluency and prediction of reading comprehension in AfricanAmerican and Caucasian elementary school children" 31 (31): 504-553, 2002

      16 Stanovich, K. E, "Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individualdifferences in the acquisition of literacy" 21 (21): 360-406, 1986

      17 Kuhn, M. R, "Fluency: A review of development and remedialpractices" Center for the Improvement of Early ReadingAchievement 2000

      18 Garbe, William, "Fluency in reading: Thirty-five years later" 22 (22): 71-83, 2010

      19 Jenkins, J. R., "Examining the validity of two measures forformative teaching: Reading aloud and maze" 59 : 421-432, 1993

      20 Good, R. H, "Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills" Institute for Development of Educational Achievement 2002

      21 "Dynamic Indicator of Basic Early Literacy Skills"

      22 Hoffman, J. V., "Developing fluency through reconstructing thetask of guided reading" 30 (30): 367-383, 1991

      23 Deno, S. l, "Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative" 52 : 219-232, 1985

      24 Shin, M. R, "Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children" Guilford 1989

      25 Marston, D, "Curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academicperformance: What is it and why do it. In Curriculum-basedmeasurement: Assessing special children" Guilford 18-78, 1989

      26 Gunning, T. G, "Creating Literacy Instruction for All Students" PearsonEducation 2008

      27 Sternberg, R. J, "Beyond IQ: A triarchy theory of the human intelligence" Cambridge University 1985

      28 Brumfit,C, "Accuracy and fluency: A fundamental distinction for communicativeteaching methodology. In Language literature teaching: Frompractice and principle." pergamon 1985

      29 Chard, J. D., "A synthesis of research on effectiveinterventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learningdisabilities" 35 (35): 386-406, 2002

      30 Anderson, R. C, "A microanalysis of thesmall-group guided reading lesson. Effects of an emphasis on global storyreading" 26 (26): 417-441, 1991

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2017-03-10 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korea Association Of Primary English Education -> The Korea Association of Primary English Education KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.81
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.94 0.92 1.442 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼