RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    물자원 관련 갈등 해결을 위한 비용부담체계 = Cost Sharing System for Water Resource Conflict Resolution

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82492803

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Allocation of water resources needs to effectively systematize through cost-sharing system. To minimize burden of cost sharing for water resource user, it is a reasonable way for Beneficiary to bear cost for quantitative and qualitative water use. Here is policy recommendations on cost sharing on water resource use. Firstly, water use charges should be adjusted based on its characteristics and objectives of current system which levy tax to stream river users based on the user pays principle. The objective of water use charges in current legal scheme is to finance for water quality improvement and inhabitant support projects to protect water resources quality. It needs to divide tax pay system for upstream water user who have higher benefit compared to downstream water users according to condition that tax payer is one who benefit from water quality improvement. Secondly, water use charges should be adjusted, beyond current water resources quality improvement objectives, to reflect qualitative and quantitative cost as well as resources cost not only for water quality improvement but also for water quantitative improvement. In long term, it means unified water use chargers system including current water use charges, dam water charges, and river use charges. Thirdly, function of water use charges needs to be clear in short term between upstream and downstream water supply source users. Current legal system in water use charges system based on the user pays principle of water supply source. Therefore additional cost for protection of water supply source to improve beyond the level of general water quality needs to levy to user of water resource. Fourthly, the range of tax standard should minimizes its list of subjects as facilities which has obligation for cost sharing for additional water supply source protection. Therefore uses of watershed management fund should provide its financial support only for water quality improvement, but current fund partially uses for total pollution management in Geumgang, Nakdonggang, Younsangang, and Sumjingang. Finally, watershed management fund also originally designed for compensation of farmers who restricted own farming activities because of water protection regulation. However land use restriction for water supply source protection is compensation for opportunity cost and watershed management fund compensate for behaviors restriction. This is duplication of compensation, therefore it needs to eliminate related implementation rules.
    번역하기

    Allocation of water resources needs to effectively systematize through cost-sharing system. To minimize burden of cost sharing for water resource user, it is a reasonable way for Beneficiary to bear cost for quantitative and qualitative water use. Her...

    Allocation of water resources needs to effectively systematize through cost-sharing system. To minimize burden of cost sharing for water resource user, it is a reasonable way for Beneficiary to bear cost for quantitative and qualitative water use. Here is policy recommendations on cost sharing on water resource use. Firstly, water use charges should be adjusted based on its characteristics and objectives of current system which levy tax to stream river users based on the user pays principle. The objective of water use charges in current legal scheme is to finance for water quality improvement and inhabitant support projects to protect water resources quality. It needs to divide tax pay system for upstream water user who have higher benefit compared to downstream water users according to condition that tax payer is one who benefit from water quality improvement. Secondly, water use charges should be adjusted, beyond current water resources quality improvement objectives, to reflect qualitative and quantitative cost as well as resources cost not only for water quality improvement but also for water quantitative improvement. In long term, it means unified water use chargers system including current water use charges, dam water charges, and river use charges. Thirdly, function of water use charges needs to be clear in short term between upstream and downstream water supply source users. Current legal system in water use charges system based on the user pays principle of water supply source. Therefore additional cost for protection of water supply source to improve beyond the level of general water quality needs to levy to user of water resource. Fourthly, the range of tax standard should minimizes its list of subjects as facilities which has obligation for cost sharing for additional water supply source protection. Therefore uses of watershed management fund should provide its financial support only for water quality improvement, but current fund partially uses for total pollution management in Geumgang, Nakdonggang, Younsangang, and Sumjingang. Finally, watershed management fund also originally designed for compensation of farmers who restricted own farming activities because of water protection regulation. However land use restriction for water supply source protection is compensation for opportunity cost and watershed management fund compensate for behaviors restriction. This is duplication of compensation, therefore it needs to eliminate related implementation rules.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김정인, "효율적 수자원 관리와 수리권 거래제도 도입의 전제 조건" 한국환경법학회 25 (25): 3-78, 2003

    2 김정인, "효율적 수자원 관리와 수리권 거래제도 도입의 전제 조건" 한국환경법학회 25 (25): 3-78, 2003

    3 박정우,이현선, "환경친화적 조세개혁방안" 한국세무학회 19 (19): 8-236, 2002

    4 문현주, "합리적인 수리권 및 수자원에의 기여와 보상체계 연구" 한국환경정책ㆍ평가연구원 2009

    5 박정우, "친환경적 기업활동을 위한 규제의 개편방안 - 수질오염방지를 위한 조세와 부담금을 중심으로 -" 한국상사판례학회 23 (23): 359-398, 2010

    6 이정전, "지속가능발전의 이념을 실천하기 위한 원칙들" 1998

    7 윤서성, "우리나라의 수자원 관리정책" 삼성지구환경연구소 1995

    8 이정전, "용부담의 원칙 : 주원칙과 부원칙" 경제정의실천시민연합‧강원개발연구원 1997

    9 박종찬, "수자원의 합리적 배분" 비교법학연구소 24 : 27-50, 2007

    10 한국수자원공사, "수자원개발‧관리에 따른 지역갈등해소 및 협력 방안" 한국수자원공사 1995

    1 김정인, "효율적 수자원 관리와 수리권 거래제도 도입의 전제 조건" 한국환경법학회 25 (25): 3-78, 2003

    2 김정인, "효율적 수자원 관리와 수리권 거래제도 도입의 전제 조건" 한국환경법학회 25 (25): 3-78, 2003

    3 박정우,이현선, "환경친화적 조세개혁방안" 한국세무학회 19 (19): 8-236, 2002

    4 문현주, "합리적인 수리권 및 수자원에의 기여와 보상체계 연구" 한국환경정책ㆍ평가연구원 2009

    5 박정우, "친환경적 기업활동을 위한 규제의 개편방안 - 수질오염방지를 위한 조세와 부담금을 중심으로 -" 한국상사판례학회 23 (23): 359-398, 2010

    6 이정전, "지속가능발전의 이념을 실천하기 위한 원칙들" 1998

    7 윤서성, "우리나라의 수자원 관리정책" 삼성지구환경연구소 1995

    8 이정전, "용부담의 원칙 : 주원칙과 부원칙" 경제정의실천시민연합‧강원개발연구원 1997

    9 박종찬, "수자원의 합리적 배분" 비교법학연구소 24 : 27-50, 2007

    10 한국수자원공사, "수자원개발‧관리에 따른 지역갈등해소 및 협력 방안" 한국수자원공사 1995

    11 김동건, "수리권제도 - 하천의 수리권을 중심으로 -" 한국환경법학회 26 (26): 45-74, 2004

    12 이재형, "미국의 주간 물 분쟁 해결을 위한 조정 제도 미국의 사례" 한국수자원학회 29 (29): 1996

    13 손진상, "물이용부담금의 현황과 개선방안" 안암법학회 통 (통): 297-331, 2007

    14 송미영, "물이용부담금 운영상의 문제점 및 과제" 경기개발연구원 2 (2): 2000

    15 장세훈, "물분쟁의 현황과 향후 과제" 국회도서관 입법전자정보실 (18) : 2001

    16 전재경, "물분쟁 해소방안에 관한 소고" 한국환경법학회 18 : 1996

    17 "http://www.unesco.org/bpi/science/content/news/upress/99-18e.htm"

    18 Baumann, Duane D., "Urban Water Demand Management and Planning" McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1998

    19 OECD, "The World in 2020-Towards a New Global Age" OECD 1997

    20 Jobin, William R., "Sustainable Management for Dams and Waters" Lewis Publishers 1998

    21 Choi, K.S., "Modeling Developed Costal Watershed with the Agricultural Non-Point Source Model" 35 (35): 1999

    22 Cobourn, J., "Integrated Watershed Management on the Truckee River In Nevada" 35 (35): 1999

    23 Ortwin Renn, "Fairness and Competence In Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse" Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.14 1.14 1.15
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.04 0.97 1.226 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼