RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일 환경치료 병실에서의 보호실 이용에 관한 고찰 = The Use of Seclusion Room in a Milieu Therapeutic Psychiatric Ward

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A1995963

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study was designed to investigate the contemporary use of seclusion in psychiatric inpatients. All of the secluded patients who had been admitted to the department of psychiatry of Wonju Christian Hospital. Yonsei University Wonju Medical Colle...

      This study was designed to investigate the contemporary use of seclusion in psychiatric inpatients. All of the secluded patients who had been admitted to the department of psychiatry of Wonju Christian Hospital. Yonsei University Wonju Medical College, from January 7th until July 7th in 1989, were included in this study. Filling up the check-list and bed side interviews were done at the time of seclusion with regard to some aspects of the use of seclusion.
      Comparison between secluded and non-secluded revealed below;
      1) Seclusion was used at some point during hospitalization once or more in 61 patients(36.6%) among 167 patients.
      2) The number of times that seclusion was used ranged from 1 to 11(mean 3.79 ±7.32. P〈0.05).
      3) By age distribution, more seclusion was used in younger age group(P〈0.05).
      4) By marital status, singles(67.2%) were secluded more frequently than the married(32.8%)(P〈0.05).
      5) With regard to admission mode, patients with compulsory admission(80.3%) were secluded more frequently than the voluntary ones(19.7%) (P〈0.05).
      6) The duration of hospital stay of secluded group were 55±34.14 and was significantly longer in the secluded group than non-secluded group(30±27.8), (P〈0.05).
      7) Both manic(34.4%) and schizophrenic(23.0%) patients were found more in the secluded group than non-secluded group(P〈0.01, P〈0.05 respectively).
      Comparison between psychotics and non-psychotics revealed below;
      1) Other staffs(82.3%) predicted seclusion more readily than doctors did (P〈0.05).
      2) Seclusion was administered more frequently during night time in psychotic groups, compared to non-psychotic groups(P〈0.05).
      3) The most common reason for seclusion was `behavior disruptive to the therapeutic environment(45.2%)'. The rest of the reasons were `uncontrolled symptom(38.4%)' `violent behavior(23, 25.0%)' in psychotics. In non-psychotics, behavior treatment(16.7%) was the most frequent cause(P〈0.05).
      4) In psychotic group, duration of seclusion revealed more than 24 hours 32.3%, and in and 4 - 12 hours in 25.0%.
      5) For other treatment modalities, use of medications(46.4%) and use of physical restraint(22.0%) were frequently done in psychotics, but in non-psychotics, simple isolation(32.4%) and interview(32.4%) were common(P〈0.05).

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼