RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    기업회계기준의 법규성 재고 = Corporate Accounting Standards as a Legal Rule Revisited

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Commercial Act of Korea revised as of 14 April, 2011 (hereinafter referred to ‘2011 Act’) incorporated K-IFRS and K-GAAP into Commercial Code as a kind of legal rule. However foregoing incorporation is not compatible with tranditional Korean legal system. First, the standard setters of both standards are IASB and KASB respectively. Since both the institutions are private ones instead of public ones, the legislative power of Korean Assembly is virtually eroded. Second, compared to the other legal rule, the way of prescription is quite different and the contents of the standards are quite obscure. Third,considering the general rule of Materiality Principle, the binding effect is relatively low and unclear compared to the other legal rule. Fourth,therefore, they can not function properly as a standard of illegality as the other legal rule.
    Then, how can we can improve foregoing problems regarding? Since IFRS has more and more influences in global perspective as years go by, the discard of IFRS is left out of consideration. The possible suggestion within current system of Korean law can be as follows. First, at least we can enhance the legal control over KASB so that we may improve democratic legitimacy. Second, by revising the enforcement ordinance of 2001 Act, we can transform the legal nature of K-IFRS and K-GAAP into quasi-legal rule instead of legal rule. In this case, if a corporation observes K-IFRS/K-GAAP it will be presumed to observe GAAP as in German Commercial Code §342(2). Third, in the long term, we should enhance our participation in IASB so that we may improve the democratic legitimacy.
    번역하기

    Commercial Act of Korea revised as of 14 April, 2011 (hereinafter referred to ‘2011 Act’) incorporated K-IFRS and K-GAAP into Commercial Code as a kind of legal rule. However foregoing incorporation is not compatible with tranditional Korean legal...

    Commercial Act of Korea revised as of 14 April, 2011 (hereinafter referred to ‘2011 Act’) incorporated K-IFRS and K-GAAP into Commercial Code as a kind of legal rule. However foregoing incorporation is not compatible with tranditional Korean legal system. First, the standard setters of both standards are IASB and KASB respectively. Since both the institutions are private ones instead of public ones, the legislative power of Korean Assembly is virtually eroded. Second, compared to the other legal rule, the way of prescription is quite different and the contents of the standards are quite obscure. Third,considering the general rule of Materiality Principle, the binding effect is relatively low and unclear compared to the other legal rule. Fourth,therefore, they can not function properly as a standard of illegality as the other legal rule.
    Then, how can we can improve foregoing problems regarding? Since IFRS has more and more influences in global perspective as years go by, the discard of IFRS is left out of consideration. The possible suggestion within current system of Korean law can be as follows. First, at least we can enhance the legal control over KASB so that we may improve democratic legitimacy. Second, by revising the enforcement ordinance of 2001 Act, we can transform the legal nature of K-IFRS and K-GAAP into quasi-legal rule instead of legal rule. In this case, if a corporation observes K-IFRS/K-GAAP it will be presumed to observe GAAP as in German Commercial Code §342(2). Third, in the long term, we should enhance our participation in IASB so that we may improve the democratic legitimacy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 오수근, "회계에 대한 법적 규율 체계" 18 (18): 2000

    2 오수근, "회계규범 입법론" (53) : 2006

    3 정종섭, "헌법학원론,제4판" 2009

    4 한국헌법학회, "헌법주석서 III, 제2판" 법제처 2010

    5 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법, 제2판" 박영사 2008

    6 허영, "한국헌법론, 제4판" 박영사 2008

    7 한국회계기준원, "한국채택국제회계기준 제정절차 중 번역과정에서 고려한 사항"

    8 김철수, "학설판례 헌법학 (중),전정신판" 박영사 2009

    9 송덕수, "신민법강의, 제4판" 박영사 2011

    10 허완중, "민주적 정당성" 한국법학원 (128) : 132-153, 2012

    1 오수근, "회계에 대한 법적 규율 체계" 18 (18): 2000

    2 오수근, "회계규범 입법론" (53) : 2006

    3 정종섭, "헌법학원론,제4판" 2009

    4 한국헌법학회, "헌법주석서 III, 제2판" 법제처 2010

    5 허영, "헌법이론과 헌법, 제2판" 박영사 2008

    6 허영, "한국헌법론, 제4판" 박영사 2008

    7 한국회계기준원, "한국채택국제회계기준 제정절차 중 번역과정에서 고려한 사항"

    8 김철수, "학설판례 헌법학 (중),전정신판" 박영사 2009

    9 송덕수, "신민법강의, 제4판" 박영사 2011

    10 허완중, "민주적 정당성" 한국법학원 (128) : 132-153, 2012

    11 박영도, "독일의 법령체계와 입법심사기준"

    12 왕순모, "기업회계법의 구축과 전망" 경성대학교 출판부 2004

    13 김노창, "국제회계기준의 판단적 용어에 대한 감사인의 인식에 대한 연구" 한국세무학회 12 (12): 395-420, 2011

    14 권재열, "개정상법 제446조의2의 의의" 한국상사법학회 30 (30): 305-336, 2011

    15 佐藤信彦, "財務会計論 I, 第4版" 中央経済社 2010

    16 弥永真生, "証券取引法と会計基準(2·完)" 174 (174): 2008

    17 安達巧, "会計基準の法的位置づけ" 税務経理協会 2004

    18 海老原諭, "会計基準の拘束力に関する一考察" 18 (18): 2008

    19 Biener, Herbert, "“Fachnormen statt Rechtsnormen – Ein Beitrag zur Deregulierung der Rechnungslegung”, Rechnungslegung – Warun und Wie, FS für Hermann Clemm zum 70"

    20 Chewning Jr., "What Does ‘Materiality’ Really Mean?" 13 : 61-, 2002

    21 Mundstock, George, "The Trouble with FASB" 28 : 813-, 2003

    22 Cunningham, Lawrence A., "The SEC’s Global Accounting Vision: A Realistic Appraisal of a Quixotic Quest" 87 : 1-, 2008

    23 Barrett, Matthew J., "The SEC and Accounting, in Part Through the Eyes of Pacioli" 80 : 837-, 2005

    24 Acevedo, Arthur, "The Fox and the Ostrich: Is GAAP a Game of Winks and Nods?" 12 : 63-, 2010

    25 Sauer, Richard C., "The Erosion of the Materiality Standard in the Enforcement of the Federal Securities Laws" 62 : 317-, 2007

    26 Ku, Julian G., "The Deletaion of Federal Power to International Organizations: New Problems with Old Solutions" 85 : 71-, 2000

    27 Bernstein, "The Concept of Materiality" 42 : 86-, 1967

    28 Claussen, Carsten P, "So mußte es kommen! - Über die Situation des deutschen Rechnungslegunsrechts"

    29 Dettmeier, Michael, "Schwerpunktbereich-Einführung in das„internationale‟ Bilanzrecht-IAS/IFRS: Ein Fall für Juristen?"

    30 Large, Ronald E., "SEC Accounting Series Release No. 150: A Critical Analysis" 54 : 317-, 1979

    31 Creifelds, Carl, "Rechtswörterbuch"

    32 Huber, Peter M., "Rechnungslegung und Demokratie" 133 (133): 2008

    33 Paal, Boris P., "Rechnungslegung und DRSC"

    34 Kieff, F. Scott, "Perspectives on Corporate Governance"

    35 Schmidt, Karsten, "Münchener Kommentar zum Handelsgesetzbuch Band 4, 2.Aufl" 2008

    36 Salky, Steven M., "Is Sarbanes-Oxley Vurnerable to Constitutional Challenge?" 19 (19): 2004

    37 Havermann, "Internationale Entwicklungen in der Rechnunglegung”, in Bilanzrecht und Kapitalmarkt"

    38 Maddona, Jon C., "International Accounting Standards, Freer Trade, and National Soverignity, In Internationale Wirtschaftsprüfung" Festschrift für Hans Havermann 1995

    39 표영인, "IFRS 중급회계(I)(II) 제3판" 명경사 2011

    40 Beisse, Heinrich, "Gedächtnisschrift für Brigitte Knobbe-Keuk, In Gedächtnisschrift für Brigitte Knobbe-Keuk" 1997

    41 Loss, Louis, "Fundamentals of Securities Regulation"

    42 사법연수원, "EU법" 사법연수원 2007

    43 Moxter, Adolf, "Die handelsrechtlichen Grundsätze ordnungsmäßiger Buchführung und das neue Bilanzrecht"

    44 Pearson, Thomas C., "Creating Accountability: Increased Legal Status of Accounting and Auditing Authorities in the Global Capital Markets(U.S. and EU)" 31 : 65-, 2006

    45 Hopt, Klaus J., "Bilanzrecht"

    46 Barney, Jacob L., "Beyond Economics: The U.S. Recognition of International Financial Reporting Standards as an International Subdelegation of the SEC’s Rulemaking Authority" 42 : 579-, 2009

    47 Ellrott, Helmut, "Beck’scher Bilanz-Kommentar" 2012

    48 May, George A, "Authoritative Financial Accounting" 32 : 698-, 1946

    49 Ochoa, Omar, "Accounting for FASB: Why Administrative Law Should Apply to the Financial Accounting Standards Board" 15 : 489-, 2011

    50 Hendriksen, Eldon S., "Accounting Theory, 5.ed." 1992

    51 Riahi-Belkaoui, "Accounting Theory, 5.ed" 2004

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-05-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN COMMERCIAL LAW ASSOCIATION KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-18 학술지등록 한글명 : 상사법연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.96 0.93 0.979 0.58
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼