日本 地區計劃의 運用 特性 硏究 = Research on the application characteristic of the Japanese district planning

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

System and enactment of Korean Urban planning have been influenced by Japan and there are many things in common. Therefore, the Korean District Unit Planning(KDUP) is associated with The Japanese District Planning(JDP).
It is significant that the Urban Design and the Detailed District Planning which used to be separatedly run are integrated into the District Unit Planning by an amendment to the Urban Planning Law in 2000. But, there are many points as which still various parts are not enough.
On the other hand, Japan has adapted and run the District Planning since 1980. Japan has improved the system corresponding to development situation.
Therefore, It is strongly suggested that analysis of systemic features and operating conditions of the JDP will help to activate the KDUP and to set up the right direction for desirable operation because district related system of both nations have connections
The purpose of this study is to suggest progressive directions of implementing the KDUP through analyzing characteristics of management condition and application of the JDP targeted on nationwide districts and sample cities.
This study mainly compares the phase, the role and systematical features of the JDP with those of the KDUP, thereby deducing the characteristics. Each systematical feature and management condition including improvement on the law and system relating to the JDP were studied, and characteristics of the JDP's application in cities such as Yokohama and Sendai were analyzed. Using a statistical analysis targeted on the whole district, actual conditions about applications of the JDP's system were defined.
Through the process of the study, the results are as follows.
1. At the time of introduction, the district-related planning systems of Korea and Japan had many similarities, but now have been developing in different aspects. In particular, the JDP has made detailed systems by improving the JDP while maintaining the original system.
2. In addition, the JDP has been applied to local, small and midium-sized cities actively, and the administration organization and public offices have an impact on actual results of application of the JDP system. The JDP's application is decided by each local self-government and the methods of the application are various in different cities.
3. Most of the JDP is composed of a fundamental form and closely related to up-zoning and development. However, the application of the JDP was not effective in urbanized areas and had not enough effects on incentive system as well
4. The JDP can be applied to two stages and contents of the planning basically include a characteristic of inducement. While contents of decision can be enforced by regulations, a scale and a design of buildings are difficult to apply the JDP.
5. Recently, Japan has promoted the improvement of the urbanized areas by improving the urban planning system with the JDP and expanding the application of the incentive system.
Based on these results of the analysis of the JDP, this study suggests that it is necessary to meet conditions such as the organizational stability, and continuity and a variety of application, in order to develop the KDUP in the future. It is also suggested that the KDUP should have supportive capability which can improve the quality of the function of the urban and landscape.
Strategies for specific improvement are as follows.
1. Subdivision of the system based on the first classified District Unit Planning.
2. Maintenance of the system to expand the application of an incentive system, and institutional provision which can secure development of the various application techniques, and fair nature and objectivity
3. The operation of the establishment of the District Unit Planning with two stages
4. The character of the agreement to the contents of a plan and the enforcement of the public relations to residents
5. Strengthening of capability and conversion of recognition by Local self-government and the citizen of the community.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• ABSTRACT
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 방법 및 구성 = 2
• 1. 연구의 방법 및 범위 = 3
• 2. 연구의 구성 = 4
• 제3절 선행연구의 검토 = 6
• 1. 지구단위계획 관련 연구 = 6
• 2. 외국 제도와의 비교 연구 = 8
• 3. 기존 연구의 평가 = 9
• 제2장 일본 지구계획제도의 고찰 = 11
• 제1절 지구계획의 개요 = 11
• 1. 지구계획의 개념 및 역할 = 11
• 2. 지구계획의 제도적 위상 = 13
• 제2절 지구계획의 구성 = 17
• 1. 유형 및 적용대상 = 17
• 2. 계획 내용 및 수립절차 = 18
• 3. 계획의 실현 수단 = 22
• 제3절 주민주도형 제도와의 관계 = 24
• 1. 주민주도형 제도와 지구계획의 관계 = 24
• 2. 주민주도형 제도의 주요 내용 = 24
• 3. 주민주도형 제도와 지구계획의 특성 비교 = 28
• 제4절 지구계획과 한국 지구단위계획의 비교 = 30
• 1. 도시계획 체계와 제도의 위상 = 30
• 2. 지구관련 제도의 주요 내용 비교 = 33
• 제4절 소결 = 41
• 제3장 제도의 도입 및 운용과정 분석 = 43
• 제1절 지구계획의 도입 및 운용 과정 분석 = 43
• 1. 1970년대 ; 도시설계(Urban Design)의 도입 = 43
• 2. 1980년대 ; 지구계획의 창설 = 47
• 3. 1990년대 ; 지구계획의 영역 확장 = 49
• 4. 2000년대 ; 도시재생 전략의 추진 = 50
• 제2절 지구계획의 적용 실적 = 55
• 1. 적용 현황 및 추이 = 55
• 2. 지역별 분포 실태 = 56
• 3. 제도별 적용 = 58
• 제3절 소결 = 60
• 제4장 일반형지구계획의 분석 및 고찰 = 63
• 제1절 일반형지구계획의 개요 = 63
• 1. 일반형지구계획의 개념 = 63
• 2. 구성 및 주요 내용 = 65
• 제2절 일반형지구계획의 운용 실태 분석 = 66
• 1. 운용 추이 및 지역적 분포 = 67
• 2. 제도 운용의 동향 = 68
• 제3절 일반형지구정비계획의 내용 분석 = 86
• 1. 일반형지구정비계획 적용의 개요 = 86
• 2. 항목별 적용 실태 = 89
• 제4절 소결 = 97
• 제5장 특정 목적 지구계획의 분석 및 고찰 = 101
• 제1절 특정지구계획 = 101
• 1. 연도지구계획(沿道地區計劃) = 101
• 2. 집락지구계획(集落地區計劃) = 108
• 3. 방재가구정비지구계획(防災街區整備地區計劃) = 111
• 제2절 재개발등촉진구(再開發等促進區) = 113
• 1. 재개발등촉진구의 개요 = 113
• 2. 재개발등촉진구의 운용 실태 = 115
• 제3절 지구정비계획 특례제도 = 125
• 1. 유도용적형지구계획(誘導容積型地區計劃) = 125
• 2. 용적의적정배분형지구계획(容積適正配分型地區計劃) = 127
• 3. 용도별용적형지구계획(用度別容積型地區計劃) = 130
• 4. 가로경관유도형지구계획(街?み誘導型地區計劃) = 133
• 5. 고도이용형지구계획(高度利用型地區計劃) = 136
• 6. 입체도로제도(立體道路制度) = 138
• 제4절 소결 = 140
• 제6장 사례도시 분석을 통한 지구계획의 활용특성 분석 = 143
• 제1절 사례도시의 선정 배경 및 개요 = 143
• 1. 橫浜市·仙台市의 선정 배경 = 143
• 2. 사례도시의 개요 = 144
• 제2절 지구계획 활용 특성 분석 = 148
• 1. 유형별 적용 실태 = 148
• 2. 개발사업 연계 및 용도지역 변경 = 150
• 3. 지구정비계획의 결정 내용 = 152
• 제3절 주민참여와 행정간의 연계 = 154
• 1. 주민주도형 제도와의 연계 = 154
• 2. 주민 홍보 = 157
• 3. 행정간의 연계 = 158
• 제4절 소결 = 159
• 제7장 결론 = 161
• 제1절 연구의 요약 = 161
• 제2절 정책 제언 및 향후 연구과제 = 163