RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      여성이 행복한 세상: OECD 국가의 성 차별 수준 국제비교 = The World Where Women are Happy: International Comparison of Gender Equality in OECD Arena

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103352772

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper firstly examines the main causes of gender discrimination and overviews the status quo of gender equality in OECD arena and gender equality indices developed by major international fora. It also designs a new index with a reference to the capability approach, and those indices, and identifies the key factors behind gender discrimination within the OECD countries by performing Principal Component Analysis, and derives weights for each of 8 indicators and the rankings of member countries. In the analysis, we confirmed that Korea ranked the 31st, belonging to the lowest ranked group among 34 OECD member countries, seriously imposed to the poor environment for gender equality. Eastern European countries such as Poland and Western Europe countries such as Sweden occupy top, which seems to reflect that idealogically their systems aim at gender equality and the supply of female labor force is urgent for the maintenance of national economic power. Main factors influencing gender equality are `economic power & empowerment`, `sound birth & social capital` and `life expectancy`. The first factor implies that the government`s policy should be focused on women`s longer education period and more to get jobs, and beyond the level of simply employed status, ensuring the sufficient level of income and the environment of an equal opportunity for women to assume high positions making important decision and be equipped with speciality. The remaining factors indicates that the government also keeps in mind the importance of issues of fertility category such as maternal health and adolescent pregnancy, extending the life of the women and the environment of building social relationship.
      번역하기

      This paper firstly examines the main causes of gender discrimination and overviews the status quo of gender equality in OECD arena and gender equality indices developed by major international fora. It also designs a new index with a reference to the c...

      This paper firstly examines the main causes of gender discrimination and overviews the status quo of gender equality in OECD arena and gender equality indices developed by major international fora. It also designs a new index with a reference to the capability approach, and those indices, and identifies the key factors behind gender discrimination within the OECD countries by performing Principal Component Analysis, and derives weights for each of 8 indicators and the rankings of member countries. In the analysis, we confirmed that Korea ranked the 31st, belonging to the lowest ranked group among 34 OECD member countries, seriously imposed to the poor environment for gender equality. Eastern European countries such as Poland and Western Europe countries such as Sweden occupy top, which seems to reflect that idealogically their systems aim at gender equality and the supply of female labor force is urgent for the maintenance of national economic power. Main factors influencing gender equality are `economic power & empowerment`, `sound birth & social capital` and `life expectancy`. The first factor implies that the government`s policy should be focused on women`s longer education period and more to get jobs, and beyond the level of simply employed status, ensuring the sufficient level of income and the environment of an equal opportunity for women to assume high positions making important decision and be equipped with speciality. The remaining factors indicates that the government also keeps in mind the importance of issues of fertility category such as maternal health and adolescent pregnancy, extending the life of the women and the environment of building social relationship.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 기타오카 다카요시, "한국의복지강국 스웨덴 경쟁력의 비밀(베푸는 복지를 넘어 성장의 원동력이 되는 복지국가실현까지)" 위즈덤하우스 2012

      2 김현경, "한국 성평등 최하위…135개국 중 108위"

      3 여성가족부, "우리나라 성불평등지수 11위, 9단계 상승"

      4 박승희, "儒敎的 觀點에서 바라본 스웨덴 社會福祉" 한국유교학회 (29) : 385-410, 2007

      5 Nussbaum, M. C., "Women and human development: The capabilities approach" Cambridge University Press 2000

      6 UNIFEM, "Who Answers to Women? Gender and Accountability, Progress of the World’s Women 2008/2009" United Nations Development Fund for Women 2008

      7 Walby, S., "The Impact of Women’s Position in the Labour Market on Current UK Productivity and Implications for Future Productivity Growth" Department of Trade, Industry, Women and Equality Unit 2002

      8 WEF, "The Global Gender Gap Report 2011" 2012

      9 UN, "The ECOSOC Agreed Conclusions 1997/2"

      10 Becker, G. S., "THE ECONOMIC WAY OF LOOKING AT LIFE, Nobel Lecture"

      1 기타오카 다카요시, "한국의복지강국 스웨덴 경쟁력의 비밀(베푸는 복지를 넘어 성장의 원동력이 되는 복지국가실현까지)" 위즈덤하우스 2012

      2 김현경, "한국 성평등 최하위…135개국 중 108위"

      3 여성가족부, "우리나라 성불평등지수 11위, 9단계 상승"

      4 박승희, "儒敎的 觀點에서 바라본 스웨덴 社會福祉" 한국유교학회 (29) : 385-410, 2007

      5 Nussbaum, M. C., "Women and human development: The capabilities approach" Cambridge University Press 2000

      6 UNIFEM, "Who Answers to Women? Gender and Accountability, Progress of the World’s Women 2008/2009" United Nations Development Fund for Women 2008

      7 Walby, S., "The Impact of Women’s Position in the Labour Market on Current UK Productivity and Implications for Future Productivity Growth" Department of Trade, Industry, Women and Equality Unit 2002

      8 WEF, "The Global Gender Gap Report 2011" 2012

      9 UN, "The ECOSOC Agreed Conclusions 1997/2"

      10 Becker, G. S., "THE ECONOMIC WAY OF LOOKING AT LIFE, Nobel Lecture"

      11 Nicoletti, G., "Summary Indicators of Product Market Regulation with an extension to Employment Protection Legislation" OECD Economics Department 2000

      12 Arnold, J., "Solow or Lucas? Testing the Speed of Convergence on a Panel of OECD Countries" 65 : 110-123, 2011

      13 OECD, "Social Institutions and Gender Index"

      14 이내찬, "OECD 국가의 삶의 질의 구조에 관한 연구" 한국보건사회연구원 32 (32): 5-40, 2012

      15 OECD, "OECD Employment Outlook 2011" 2011

      16 Hair, J. F., "Multivariate Data Analysis: With Raedings" Prentice-Hall International, Inc 1995

      17 Maslow, A. H., "Motivation and Personality" Harper & Row 1987

      18 Olsen, W., "Modelling Gender Pay Gaps" Equal Opportunities Commission 2004

      19 Social Watch, "MEASURING INEQUITY: THE 2012 GENDER EQUITY INDEX"

      20 UNDP, "Human Development Report 2011 Sustainability and Equity: A Better Future for All" 2011

      21 Wikigender, "Gender Equality"

      22 EU, "European Quality of Life Survey"

      23 OECD, "Doing Better for Families" 2012

      24 Bassanini, A., "Does Human Capital Matter for Growth in OECD Countries? A Pooled Mean-group Approach" 74 : 399-405, 2002

      25 Sen, A., "Development as Freedom" Oxford University Press 1999

      26 UN, "Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women" 1979

      27 OECD, "Closing the Gender Gap Act Now" 2012

      28 OECD, "Better Life Index"

      29 Kaiser, H. F., "An index of factorial simplicity" 39 : 31-36, 1974

      30 김태홍, "2011년 한국의 성평등보고서" 여성가족부 2011

      31 김태홍, "2009년 성평등지표 개발과 측정방안 연구" 여성가족부 2009

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-04-25 학술지등록 한글명 : 보건사회연구
      외국어명 : Health and Social Welfare Review
      KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.79 1.79 1.91
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.06 2.16 2.497 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼